Climate change: how hot will it get in my lifetime? – interactive | Environment | theguardian.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- “most secure in American history”
- “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- April 11, 1965 Tornado Outbreak
- The CO2 Endangerment Finding
- Climate Correlation
- What Me Worry?
- Heatwaves Of 1980
- More Proof Of Global Warming
- Shutting Down The Climate
- ChatGPT Research Proposal
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
Recent Comments
- Billyjack on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Desperate State Of The Cryosphere
- Bob G on “most secure in American history”
- arn on Climate Correlation
- arn on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- arn on “most secure in American history”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- conrad ziefle on “most secure in American history”
- oeman50 on “Trump moves to hobble major US climate change study”
- dm on “most secure in American history”
Better than the magic 8 ball
Zodiac readers and numerologists will love this one. Sheesh!
I used my year of birth and received the following message:
The last decade was 0.5°C hotter than the decade before you were born
My wife is 6 years younger and got the message:
The last decade was 0.6°C hotter than the decade before you were born.
What? 0,1°C more.
No wonder the models don’t work.
Yet the Guardian wonders why its circulation figures are going down the toilet. I predict that they will soon become a thing of the past.
Jokes aside: I have to wonder whether the Guardian, like the BBC, has invested a lot of its staff pension money into carbon schemes. Does anyone have an idea? This is the only explanation I can thing of for their hysteria and infantile behaviour.