Climate change: how hot will it get in my lifetime? – interactive | Environment | theguardian.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- arn on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- arn on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Greg in NZ on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Trevor on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Bob G on Posting On X
Better than the magic 8 ball
Zodiac readers and numerologists will love this one. Sheesh!
I used my year of birth and received the following message:
The last decade was 0.5°C hotter than the decade before you were born
My wife is 6 years younger and got the message:
The last decade was 0.6°C hotter than the decade before you were born.
What? 0,1°C more.
No wonder the models don’t work.
Yet the Guardian wonders why its circulation figures are going down the toilet. I predict that they will soon become a thing of the past.
Jokes aside: I have to wonder whether the Guardian, like the BBC, has invested a lot of its staff pension money into carbon schemes. Does anyone have an idea? This is the only explanation I can thing of for their hysteria and infantile behaviour.