In 2010, our friends got hysterical about a block of ice which calved off the Petermann Glacier in Greenland. Since then, the glacier has grown 3km.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- Bruce of Newcastle on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
This will not do!!! Quick….adjust the data…er image…
So this glacier is doing its normal thing… advancing… breaking off chunks…repeat…I guess anything for “the cause”
Since the 2010 calving was the largest single area loss observed for Greenland it is reasonable to assume it last calved a big chunk before the satellite era; let’s say 1980. In that case may carry on growing for another 20+ years before another big chunk breaks off.
The chunk that broke off in 2010 was 275 km² and about 20km long so that fits with about 14 years of growth at the current rate.
My guess is there won’t be any more big chunks calving for at least 10 more years.
Petermann in 2003:
http://www.panoramio.com/photo_explorer#view=photo&position=7&with_photo_id=2716359&order=date_desc&user=283604
I’ve seen that photo too – on Google Earth. It’s a wrong caption. The glacier shown in that Panoramio photo is relatively small. It has a pronounced bend in it – and there is a bay full of islands just beyond its mouth (Qaanaaq Inlet?). I believe that one is located about 30km due east of Thule Airport.
The real Petermann glacier is much larger . . . http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/01/petermann-glacier-photos_n_945044.html
(Sorry if the link is to the dreaded HuffPo – but it is a good set of photos)
You’re right it’s the one that comes out at Kuinassuk. So much for Claus Halkjaer’s skill at map reading – and mine.
You might want to double check this. There was another large calving event in 2012. It was not not quite as large as the 2010 event. Both chunks broke off at lines of weakness that were clearly visible travelling down the glacier in aerial photographs dating back to 2000 (I haven’t been able to find anything older).
Last time I was able to look at it on the ‘Arctic.io’ site* there was a lot of sea ice disguising the actual terminus of the glacier. The glacier itself has marked longitudinal stripes, the sea ice does not.
*The area has been hidden by cloud for most of the past arctic summer, and then the ‘Arctic.io’ MODIS photo mosaic disappeared for most of August/September – just when things were getting intersting.