Temperatures have been flat to down since 360 PPM CO2, but through the entire satellite record, the worst case that could be made is 0.3ºC warming per 100 PPM CO2 .
ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends/co2_mm_mlo.txt
rss_monthly_msu_amsu_channel_tlt_anomalies_land_and_ocean_v03_3.txt
Antarctic temperatures show no correlation with CO2, and Arctic temperatures show less than 1ºC per 100 PPM CO2.
What!
We drove all those SUVs for decades, and nothing.
Future generations are going to think us so dumb-ass stupid for not continuing to drive them.
There is an obvious biais in temperature records. There cannot be both a positive trend in one hemisphere, and a zero trend in the other, with the same CO2 measurement.
Rather than looking at CO2, which these graphs show has no impact whatsoever, temperature data collection and post-processing methods should be scrutinized. At best there are flaws to be fixed, but more probably, in view of the political biais of the issue by “climatologists”, there is fraud involved.
Of course there can be a temperature increase in the north and nothing in the south. Because temperature delta has nothing to do with CO2 and everything to do with the amount of industrial activity and urbanisation – minimal in the south and just enough in the north to push up a smidgen. As technology makes industrial activity more energy efficient, much less is lost to heat and thus temperatures will revert to equilibrium with UHI the only significant human induced factor on local temperatures.
And we have more ocean in the south than the north that acts as a buffer to the stupid runaway heat scenarios. CAGW is a myth created to change tax law and direct more and more wealth away from free people and to the elite few. It’s no secret. The rest of the noise is PR.
As was once said, an average global temperature is as useful as an average phone number.
Running with data is as dangerous as running with scissors.
Also the north has more land, and the south more ocean.
All the heat is trapped in the Oceans!! 400,000 Hiroshima bombs per minute… LOL!!
Interesting data. Arctic temperatures have no correlation with CO2 levels. It’s a compelling argument, but I guess I find it hard to believe based on just the data alone. Say a little bit more about it so we can understand more!