Global temperatures have declined since 1997, while CO2 has increased exponentially -proving that the Kyoto protocol worked.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- GW on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
The evidence is in. If increasing CO2 emissions stops global warming, then speeding up CO2 emissions even more should bend the curve towards global cooling. We need a new Kyoto style agreement that limits how fast CO2 emissions are allowed to slow.
🙂
off topic but you might want to add this one to your catalog of “oops”:
http://deepclimate.org/2012/10/04/2012-arctic-sea-ice-minimum-part-3-arctic-sea-ice-death-spiral-continues/#comments