Twitter / AGW_Prof: 10-15 yrs of T data to claim …
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Hank Phillips on Climate Attribution Model
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on “Why Do You Resist?”
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
Maybe your post should read
“Lying.to accomplish your goals in life is the new American way to sucess”
Simply amazing the BS that @agw_proff tweets.
This devastating little factoid is killing alarmists. They hate it. Run with it for all it’s worth.
(btw Steve I notice your comment didn’t last long on the Guardian’s polar bear thread. Ho ho, what a surprise.)
A more telling fact is that the AGW crowd based their hysteria on about a 20 year warming trend. So they can argue for destroying the modern world on a 20 year trend, but a 17 year trend is childish to use as a rebuttal? I really am coming to dislike these guys.
…or only a 14 year warming trend, in the US, before fraudulent adjustments:
Goddard: Roots of US data tampering go back 25 years
OMG! Mandia has reproduced. Think of the CO2.
Well I think if his 6 years old would stop growing for some 4-5 years he has a real problem.
This is in perspective the time when we got a warming (about 20 years) and not (17 years).
In addition the 17 years have seen more CO2 anthropogenic emissions then the 20 years before….
(2011 33 mil kt CO2 versus 22 mil kt CO2 in 1990)
http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=CO2ts1990-2011&sort=des9
Exactly, but notice the CO2 drops radically every season. Something more powerful at work there – probably called winter at Mauna Loa..