Using Fraudulent Data To Influence Congress

Joe D’Aleo sent this over. A web site endorsed by the Nebraska state climatologist is being used to influence Congress about US temperature trends. In the case of Colorado, it shows  a strong warming trend.

ScreenHunter_47 Nov. 06 06.45

Temperature Trends

The raw data shows that Colorado has been cooling over the same interval.

ScreenHunter_46 Nov. 06 06.45

Index of /pub/data/ghcn/daily/hcn/

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Using Fraudulent Data To Influence Congress

  1. gator69 says:

    From their “About” page…

    “The temperature data are from thermometers located at meteorological stations around the world. For US stations we show the NOAA/NCDC (USHCN v2.5) bias-adjusted annual average values. They are taken from the file ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.v2.5.0.20130423

    Confirmation bias-adjusted.

  2. Showing a trend by using part of a cyclical function is fraudulent. Here is an old post of mine on Colorado:
    http://naturalclimate.wordpress.com/2012/06/30/colorado-annual-temps/

    The trend is nowhere near their claim, even if you use adjusted data.

  3. Real scientists (yes, like me) need to tell them the data is noisy junk. Period.

  4. The Iconoclast says:

    Kind of weird how temperature stations on asphalt near runways and such require upward adjustments.

  5. R. de Haan says:

    Send the info to CNN, you never know what they do with it.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXJ_wg307CM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *