[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtAtyssFFNY]
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- Bob G on Gaslighting 1924
- arn on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Gordon Vigurs on Gaslighting 1924
- conrad ziefle on Gaslighting 1924
- Robertvd on Gaslighting 1924

Racist!
Shut up!
Exactly how do you “retrofit” a 1,000 Megawatt coal or NG electricity generation operation?
Raze them and replace them with solar. You might get a megawatt
If you don’t use facts to argue, what do you base your arguments on?
I don’t think Obummer will see your question here….
Having command of the English language is a bummer. Imagine, telling people that they “mustn’t argue with facts” can be taken as “don’t use facts when arguing.”
So what is supposed to be used?
Opinion, hyperbole, untruths, lies, damned lies, statistics that can’t be validated, fudged data, stereotypes, projections, name calling, class warfare, any reference from Marx, any reference from Alinsky… feel free to add to the list.