[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtAtyssFFNY]
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
Recent Comments
- arn on “what the science shows”
- Bob G on Causes Of Earthquakes
- Bob G on “what the science shows”
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Tel on “what the science shows”
- Solar Mutant Ninjaneer on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- conrad ziefle on Precision Taxation
- conrad ziefle on Causes Of Earthquakes
- conrad ziefle on “what the science shows”
Racist!
Shut up!
Exactly how do you “retrofit” a 1,000 Megawatt coal or NG electricity generation operation?
Raze them and replace them with solar. You might get a megawatt
If you don’t use facts to argue, what do you base your arguments on?
I don’t think Obummer will see your question here….
Having command of the English language is a bummer. Imagine, telling people that they “mustn’t argue with facts” can be taken as “don’t use facts when arguing.”
So what is supposed to be used?
Opinion, hyperbole, untruths, lies, damned lies, statistics that can’t be validated, fudged data, stereotypes, projections, name calling, class warfare, any reference from Marx, any reference from Alinsky… feel free to add to the list.