Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- spren on “filled with racist remarks”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Bob G on “falsely labeling”
- Bill on Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- William on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Mac on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- arn on Protesting Too Much Snow
Mother Nature is a climate skeptic!! LOL!
She sure must hate the alarmists.
Gaia what have you done?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k80nW6AOhTs
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/07/31/the-death-spiral-of-mark-serreze-arctic-propaganda-continues/#comment-398039
Mother nature is behind that vast right wing conspiracy
Mr. Heller you get at A for your work. You have properly documented and sourced your data. I repeated your results with the GISS data. –Confirmed.
GISS gets an F for losing data, failing to show their work, and providing no specific justification for their modifications to the data for this station. However, I welcome the chance to review their detailed, data point by data point reasoning for GISS modifications going from this data:
GHCN V2 : http://data.giss.nasa.gov/tmp/gistemp/STATIONS/tmp_620040300000_1_0/station.txt
to this:
GHCN V3: http://data.giss.nasa.gov/tmp/gistemp/STATIONS/tmp_620040300000_14_0/station.txt
So, GISS: Please explain each and every change made to this data base. The broad application of your “standard” adjustments is not a satisfactory answer. Also, explain why and how so much data in v3 is now missing.
Both of these links return a “not found” page.
Neilszoo, here it is again. It worked intermittently for me just now, but it’s 3-for-3 over the last three attempts. I also checked…they didn’t change it from this morning.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/tmp/gistemp/STATIONS/tmp_620040300000_14_0/station.txt
The above link was for V3. V2 was working fine. Here’s V2 again:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/tmp/gistemp/STATIONS/tmp_620040300000_1_0/station.txt
I had the same problem yesterday – today they’re OK.
GISS servers having problems?
These people have no shame.
Atlantic slows warming, temperature rises seen resuming from 2030: study
Reuters By Alister Doyle
5 minutes ago
By Alister Doyle
OSLO,(Reuters) – The Atlantic Ocean has masked global warming this century by soaking up vast amounts of heat from the atmosphere in a shift likely to reverse from around 2030 and spur fast temperature rises, scientists said.
The theory is the latest explanation for a slowdown in the pace of warming at the Earth’s surface since about 1998 that has puzzled experts because it conflicts with rising greenhouse gas emissions, especially from emerging economies led by China.
What’s this excuse number 38?
Or is it just a refinement for one of the earlier ones?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Le_Chatelier's_principle
This really needs to be applied to climate science. if i push you, you do not fly into space, there is a counterforce and new equilibrium. (hopefully the counter is not a left hook to my jaw)
Plus can we please emphasize that none of us will ever experience climate change. That is anthropological time scale. Our puny 80 year lifespan only sees weather.
+1
Here’s a link to Iceland’s meteorological institute, they have their own numbers:
http://en.vedur.is/climatology/data/#a
Too late, too tired to feed in the numbers to Excel…
Graphed GHCN V2, V3, and the Iceland Met Office. V2 and the Iceland Met data synch very well. V3 is way out.
Link here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/yt5lptngxoey500/Reykjavik%20GHCN%20v2%20and%20v3%20and%20Iceland%20Met%20graph.tiff?dl=0
Better to keep the negative consequences in the out years.
2030? 15 years from now, using my intricate modeling methods I can ascertain from that data that the average age of climate scientists is 47 years old.
Based projections of purely observational data I’ve ascertained that 97% of those 47 year old climate scientists earned or will earn grades in their university Statistics classes which place them in the lowest quintile between the football players and gender studies majors.
http://news.yahoo.com/earths-missing-heat-found-182808474.html
Read the comments. The comments on Yahoo articles are running about 97% against AGW these days. Nobody believes it anymore.
97% is the key number alright. 🙂
Yes, and they are up to 97 excuses for the pause. Way past “my dog ate it”
Meanwhile in Canada, mounds of last winter’s snow have yet to melt.
http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2014/08/20140821-114513.html
y however has confusing tweets from march. So I found this one to make sure it is around in august:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/08/13/winnipeg-hopes-18-metre-high-dirt-covered-snowpile-will-melt-before-winter-strikes-again/
Look how ridiculously different the following two graphs are:
NORSEX: death spiral is doing great thanks,
http://arctic-roos.org/observations/satellite-data/sea-ice/observation_images/ssmi1_ice_ext.png
DMI, showing the estimate for Aug. 21 (one day after NORSEX) and still above 2013,
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/plots/icecover/icecover_current_new.png
Having in sight the absurd graph NORSEX did for 2008- with all those absurd oscillations in April/May- I guess they’re just screwing things up again.
Their graph makes no sense.