Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- No One Is Above The Law!
- Securing Reproductive Rights
- Endless Summer At The New York Times
- “baseless claim”
- “Scientists Tell Us”
- Assessing Climate Risk
- Thanksgiving Greeting From Dr. Fauci
- Follow Liz To Canada
- Climate Deal Reached
- “Siberia will become the greatest farming country in the world”
- New York To Flee The US For Canada
- 50% EV Sales By 2030
- Ivy League Clown Show
- Biden’s Existential Threat
- Massachusetts Saving The Planet
- France And England To Defeat Russia
- COP29 Update
- Bicycles Can End Bad Weather
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on No One Is Above The Law!
- Gamecock on No One Is Above The Law!
- Gamecock on No One Is Above The Law!
- arn on No One Is Above The Law!
- William on No One Is Above The Law!
- oeman50 on No One Is Above The Law!
- William on No One Is Above The Law!
- Reid on No One Is Above The Law!
- arn on No One Is Above The Law!
- Gamecock on No One Is Above The Law!
Reblogged this on The Arts Mechanical and commented:
“By using hand picked evidence we can prove almost anything in climate.”
That’s unfortunately the way climate science seems to be done.
I’m pretty sure I see a hockey stick on the rightmost 1/128th of an inch of the graph.
http://www.tomrand.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/4768681697_077a6cc116_z.jpg
The climate was trending warmer in 1937, but from 1940 to 1980 it trended colder. But then from 1980 to 1998 it trended warmer and it has been flat ever since.
So what does that prove? Absolutely nothing. What does it portend? Your guess is as good as mine. But at least I am not siphoning $28 billion a year from the treasury, to make a wild assed claim, based on lies and fabricated data, that something catastrophic is about to happen.
The key Question, is whether people today, are more or less honest in relation to climate reporting & predictions.? Today, the financial incentives along with better tools have made
Climate Fraud attractive to the point of it being the status quo ; obviously they failed ethics.!