Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Gerald Machnee on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Macha on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- JohnFrancis on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Reblogged this on The Arts Mechanical and commented:
“By using hand picked evidence we can prove almost anything in climate.”
That’s unfortunately the way climate science seems to be done.
I’m pretty sure I see a hockey stick on the rightmost 1/128th of an inch of the graph.
http://www.tomrand.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/4768681697_077a6cc116_z.jpg
The climate was trending warmer in 1937, but from 1940 to 1980 it trended colder. But then from 1980 to 1998 it trended warmer and it has been flat ever since.
So what does that prove? Absolutely nothing. What does it portend? Your guess is as good as mine. But at least I am not siphoning $28 billion a year from the treasury, to make a wild assed claim, based on lies and fabricated data, that something catastrophic is about to happen.
The key Question, is whether people today, are more or less honest in relation to climate reporting & predictions.? Today, the financial incentives along with better tools have made
Climate Fraud attractive to the point of it being the status quo ; obviously they failed ethics.!