Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- arn on “Siberia might stay livable”
Reblogged this on The Arts Mechanical and commented:
“By using hand picked evidence we can prove almost anything in climate.”
That’s unfortunately the way climate science seems to be done.
I’m pretty sure I see a hockey stick on the rightmost 1/128th of an inch of the graph.
http://www.tomrand.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/4768681697_077a6cc116_z.jpg
The climate was trending warmer in 1937, but from 1940 to 1980 it trended colder. But then from 1980 to 1998 it trended warmer and it has been flat ever since.
So what does that prove? Absolutely nothing. What does it portend? Your guess is as good as mine. But at least I am not siphoning $28 billion a year from the treasury, to make a wild assed claim, based on lies and fabricated data, that something catastrophic is about to happen.
The key Question, is whether people today, are more or less honest in relation to climate reporting & predictions.? Today, the financial incentives along with better tools have made
Climate Fraud attractive to the point of it being the status quo ; obviously they failed ethics.!