Climate Nuremburg

Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities

  • Voltaire

2016-11-01131715

Sir David Attenborough proposes shooting Donald Trump to save climate

Difficult to imagine anyone being stupid enough to believe the climate either needs saving, or that they have the power to influence the climate. But believing you can stop hurricanes by shooting people takes stupidity and evil to an entirely new level.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Climate Nuremburg

  1. rw says:

    This may be something of a Freudian slip – demonstrating again what AGW is really all about.

  2. Yaakov Haimovich says:

    Sir David has been well over his “best before” date for a long time.
    But the BBC+The Guardian gang believe they rule the world.

  3. Jack Striker says:

    If someone hasn’t reported his death threat to the Secret Service, I will. That’s a crime.

  4. RAH says:

    Doesn’t surprise me a bit.
    YouTube Censors Video on … Left-Wing Censorship
    http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/culture/matt-philbin/2016/11/01/youtube-censors-video-%E2%80%A6-left-wing-censorship

    The modern Liberal is exactly the opposite of what they claim to be.

    • Gail Combs says:

      The modern Liberal is a power hungry totalitarian. Communism/socialism is the fairy tale they use to lull the sheeple before the slaughter and I do mean slaughter — Democide – Death By Government for anyone not willing to be a serf/slave.

      Straight from Fabian co-founder George Bernard Shaw

      KILLING THOSE “UNFIT TO LIVE”
      “The moment we face it frankly we are driven to the conclusion that the community has a right to put a price on the right to live in it … If people are fit to live, let them live under decent human conditions. If they are not fit to live, kill them in a decent human way. Is it any wonder that some of us are driven to prescribe the lethal chamber as the solution for the hard cases which are at present made the excuse for dragging all the other cases down to their level, and the only solution that will create a sense of full social responsibility in modern populations?”

      Source: George Bernard Shaw, Prefaces (London: Constable and Co., 1934), p. 296.

      “Under Socialism, you would not be allowed to be poor. You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you liked it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner; but whilst you were permitted to live, you would have to live well.”

      George Bernard Shaw: The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism, 1928, pg. 470

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        Yep, that’s Shaw summing up his superior insights and patting himself on the back for being so intelligent and writing it down:

        “As far as I know I was the first Socialist writer to whom it occurred to state this explicitly as a necessary postulate of permanent civilization; but as nothing that is true is ever new I daresay it had been said again and again before I was born.”

        Here’s a link to the 1928 edition:

        https://ia801302.us.archive.org/27/items/TheIntelligentWomensGuideToSocialismAndCapitalism/TheIntelligentWomensGuideToSocialismAndCapitalism.pdf

        God save us from the “intelligent” and their “permanent civilization”.

        • gator69 says:

          Amazon has 4reviews, and they are all 5 stars.

          Absolute genius. Shaw gives a understandable and accurate explantion of socialism and capitalism. It seems particularly revelvant in today’s societal struggles with class, race, and politics. A book everyone who is interested in social justice should read.

          I’m guessing that all 4 reviewers consider themselves to have character and industry that precludes them from being snuffed out in a kindly manner.

          • Colorado Wellington says:

            I’ve had the same thought reading those reviews. I have never met a Progressive who didn’t think himself much smarter than the rest of us.

            I “appeal to the chemists to discover a humane gas that will kill instantly and painlessly. Deadly by all means, but humane, not cruel …”

            George Bernard Shaw, BBC’s The Listener, Feb 7, 1934

            Shaw was a regular in the weekly …

      • wert says:

        So Shaw was left wing and pro death penalty. Interesting detail.

  5. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    Thanks for this post. Events over the past seven years – since Climategate emails surfaced in Nov 2009 – show that government scientists only lie when their lips are moving or their printers printing.

    Unintentionally, they helped us get the paper on solar cosmic rays published: http://www.journalijar.com/ar ticle/12657/solar–cosmic–ray s–and–climate./

    The preprint is easier to read and perhaps more poignant:
    https://dl. dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/HUMAN_DESTINY.pdf

    Efforts to hide reality from the public, as first revealed by Climategate emails in Nov 2009, may come to an abrupt end on Nov 8 2016.

    I still hope to write a short note on cosmology before retiring from science.

  6. Jim Steele says:

    I loved Attenborough’s nature videos and used them extensively for my students. But it recently became clear he would use video to falsely bias people towards global warming fear as he did regards polar bears.

    http://landscapesandcycles.net/attenborough-s-polar-bears–believe-only-half-.html

    That he would advocate shooting a skeptic is just another example of his descent from honest science into the bowels of dishonest politics

    • Olaf Koenders says:

      It appears to be the BBC and National Geographic “requiring” some form of “AGW acceptance” in nature documentaries. Much like DeGrasse-Tyson, Cox and Attenborough now all appear to be singing the same tune that Michio Kaku and David Suzuki have been wailing for some time.

      If they wish to continue their careers, they’d better toe the AGW line, regardless how appalling and embarrassing they look now and after the final bell tolls for them and AGW.

  7. DK Rhideat says:

    Attenborough is a disgrace.

    Senility is not an excuse.

    This man is not an expert, but is one of those who would condone genocide in the name of ‘saving the planet’.

    Time to go David

  8. The ol' Sea dog says:

    He is so arrogant he is beyond belief…….

    We shouldn’t have had a vote on the EU because voters aren’t wise enough, says Attenborough: Naturalist risks enraging millions with his comments
    Sir David Attenborough said the Brexit vote has created a ‘mess’ in Britain
    His comments could enrage millions as he said the UK is not ‘wise’ enough
    Critics have accused the 90-year-old TV naturalist of being ‘elitist’
    By TIM LAMDEN FOR THE DAILY MAIL

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3891974/We-shouldn-t-vote-EU-voters-aren-t-wise-says-Attenborough-Naturalist-risks-enraging-millions-comments.html#ixzz4OnehaIPr
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

  9. annieoakley says:

    I really believe Pablo Escobar had more ethics than these people.

  10. Druach says:

    He also stated that the people of the uk should not have been given a vote on the EU (Brexit) as they were too stupid to understand the question!

  11. Tom Harley says:

    He is a Clinton ‘Accomplice’, as are all those that are on the Clinton teat or feeding at the Clinton trough. Lots of climate NGOs and Green blobs, too, are accomplices.

Leave a Reply to John Silver Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.