Game Over For The Climate Scam

The Independent finally gets their headline partially correct.

2016-11-12-21-18-38

Climate change may be escalating so fast it could be ‘game over’, scientists warn | The Independent

What they meant to say was “game over for the climate change scam.”

A few years ago, James Hansen said it was game over for the climate if the Keystone Pipeline was built. Obama should have approved it, because it was already too late to save the climate.

2016-11-12-21-25-28

NASA’s Hansen Explains Decision to Join Keystone Pipeline Protests | InsideClimate News

Sixteen years ago, the Independent announced “Snowfalls are a thing of the past.”

2016-11-12-21-40-41

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – Environment – The Independent

The UN also said it was game over for the climate by 1999.

2016-11-12-21-56-54

Mercury News: Search Results

Progressives are complete morons – who somehow imagine themselves to be intelligent.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Game Over For The Climate Scam

  1. Eric Simpson says:

    Some more of their neverending bullsh|t:
    “Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.” -Noel Brown, ex UNEP Director, 1989
    “A billion people could die from global warming by 2020.” -John Holdren 1986
    “By 1995 somewhere between 75 and 85 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.” -(leftist) Senator Gaylord Nelson, 1970
    “[Inaction will cause]… by the turn of the century [2000], an ecological catastrophe which will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible as any nuclear holocaust.” -Mustafa Tolba, 1982, former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Program

    • wert says:

      For European readers. That is Obama’s advisor John Holdren. Think about it.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Holdren

      • wert says:

        A note on Wikipedia – Holdren is not listed as an alarmist, Ebell is declared as a denier. There is your Connolleyish balance of Wikipedia.

        • T. M says:

          Yes, be very skeptical of Wiki on anything that has a political slant. It is edited largely by leftists. This is a very scary situation since so many people put a lot of faith in Wiki. Fight it at every turn.

          “He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”
          ― George Orwell, 1984

        • wert says:

          Wikiwriters are young. The young are leftists. They’ll get some brain later.

    • gator69 says:

      These oldies but goodies were just a few of the predictions made on the first Earth Day…

      “We have about five more years at the outside to do something.”
      • Kenneth Watt, ecologist

      “Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”
      • George Wald, Harvard Biologist

      “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make. The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”
      • Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist

      “By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”
      • Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist

      “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation.”
      • Denis Hayes, chief organizer for Earth Day

      “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”
      • Peter Gunter, professor, North Texas State University

      “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”
      • Life Magazine, January 1970

      “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”
      • Kenneth Watt, Ecologist

      “Air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.”
      • Paul Ehrlich, Stanford University biologist

      “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.’”
      • Kenneth Watt, Ecologist

      “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”
      • Sen. Gaylord Nelson

      “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”
      • Kenneth Watt, Ecologist

      What’s stupid is new again!

  2. wert says:

    The CAGW type global warming game over is like any usual Game Over. You just insert some money, and you will get a new game over.

    In an Atari, it was a coin. In AGW, it is a billion. And Atari is funnier and more useful.

    The idiots there really don’t get it: the more you shout game over, the less you have credibility. If you want action, you say what the option concretely is and tell how much it helps. The alarmists don’t have a concrete option, nor they can show the ROI. They just claim the losses are infinite, so 1% reduction is also infinite… Big deal.

    It is also worth noting they really thought Princess Hilliary Clinton is their only hope, world-wide. What a thought. No need to do anything in India, China, Europe, Africa, South America. Everything circles around hillarious Clinton.

  3. RAH says:

    Oh Me or My! I’m going to lose sleep over this tonight I’m sure. Things will never be the same. Another batch of “scientists” are predicting disaster may happen in another Rag . Woe is me!

  4. oldbrew says:

    Climate scientists pretending to be fortune tellers – OK for a party but no good in the real world.

  5. T. M says:

    Warmists, like the little boy who cried “Wolf”, have been overplaying their case for almost 40 years. Apocalyptic predictions based on nothing but wild speculation (ie disproven models) have finally made people immune to their fear-mongering. Now Donald Trump and other more skeptical leaders who have seen through the BS will gut their efforts and help restore climate science to respectability. At last!

  6. Pingback: Is it “game over” for the world’s climate? » Lysander Spooner University

  7. Z says:

    And John Kerry just went to the antarctic to “check on sea level rise” … I hear it’s much worse down there!

  8. John B., M.D. says:

    Proof it is all about the money:

    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-climatechange-nations-idUSKBN1370BD
    “But there is widespread unease about finance at the Nov. 7-18 talks on climate change among almost 200 nations being held in Marrakesh, Morocco.

    “My only worry is the money,” said Tosi Mpanu Mpanu of Democratic Republic of Congo, who heads a group of the 48 least developed nations. “It’s worrying when you know that Trump is a climate change skeptic,” he told Reuters.

    “Investments in green growth can be braked … green finance can be braked,” under Trump, French Environment Minister Segolene Royal told Reuters, calling some of Trump’s climate policies “catastrophic”.

    Among the first casualties could be the Green Climate Fund (GCF), meant to help developing countries act. Rich nations promised the GCF $10 billion in a first round of funding in 2014, including $3.0 billion from the United States.

    President Barack Obama’s administration has only made $500 million available so far, and Trump may withhold the rest.”

  9. Dave N says:

    It’s been “game over” so many times one wonders if someone keeps putting more coins in the arcade game, and presses “start”. One also must wonder how many times “game over” has to be proclaimed before everyone is totally bored of it

Leave a Reply to Eric Simpson Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.