Will Superstition Continue To Drive Science After The Election?

Joe Romm and NOAA are pushing all the usual BS about warm weather being climate.

screen-shot-2016-11-01-at-9-30-39-pm screen-shot-2016-11-01-at-9-31-33-pm

Will global warming help drive record election turnout?

The percent of the country above 80F on November 8 has declined over the past century.

screen-shot-2016-11-01-at-9-41-02-pm

The number of daily maximum temperature records has plummeted.

screen-shot-2016-11-01-at-9-24-07-pm

The number of daily minimum temperature records has also plummeted.

screen-shot-2016-11-01-at-9-32-42-pm

Weather in the US is getting milder, with fewer extremes of heat or cold. The NOAA conclusions about the data are complete nonsense. Warmer night time temperatures are due to Urban Heat Island effects and humidity due to increased agricultural production.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Will Superstition Continue To Drive Science After The Election?

  1. Mark Luhman says:

    The problem with these so called records it what we are getting out of NOAA is it record for the last thirty years, not the all-time record. I figured that out when they kept telling me the all time high for Phoenix in June July and August was in the 109 range, anyone one whit a half of a brain should know any day in Phoenix during those months the all- time high will be in the teens. if not the high teens. Of course either our media in on it or the are just useful idiot, I personal going with useful idiots.

  2. AndyG55 says:

    Joe Romm asks, “Will global warming drive record help drive record election turnout?”

    Yes Joe, and they will be voting for Trump, who will crush the whole scam !!

    People are waking up to the truth.. finally .. to totalitarian socialism masquerading as climate whatever.

  3. D. Self says:

    The gravy train will hopefully end soon for liars like Romm.

  4. Steve Case says:

    Weather in the US is getting milder, with fewer extremes of heat or cold. The NOAA conclusions about the data are complete nonsense. Warmer night time temperatures are due to Urban Heat Island effects and humidity due to increased agricultural production.

    B I N G O !

  5. CheshireRed says:

    During the years immediately following the ’98 el Nino when temps were busy going nowhere, every cold weather joke about ‘whatever happened to global warming’ received a furious response that ‘weather is short term, climate is 30 years – schoolboy error!’.

    Now we have exactly the opposite, where previously accepted laws of meteorology / climatology have been turned on their heads to accommodate a now totally failed theory. If climate really IS a minimum of 30 years then none of the recent claimed issues – eg polar ice, polar vortex’s, 2 year droughts and the odd hurricane here or there, must still be merely weather and therefore cannot be classed as ‘climate’. Strange times.

  6. Winnipeg Boy says:

    Generally milder with fewer extremes. If humans do influence weather/climate, we are doing a great job at it.
    I’ll take more of that please.

  7. RickS says:

    “The NOAA conclusions about the data are “complete nonsense”” ?

    Umm, no… !

    [ The NOAA conclusions about the data are complete LIES, FALSEHOODS, DECEIT, DECEPTION, DISINFORMATION, DISTORTION, etc, etc, etc… ! ]

    They “KNOW” (NO?) they are lying out their @$$ too, but the best thing about it is that “They” (NOAA, NASA) get paid ($$$,$$$.00) handsomely while doing it on the “Stupid” American Taxpayers dime !!!

    Americans are stupid you know…

    And they (Americans) weren’t born with it but still it seems as if it does come naturally ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.