The New York Times swooned over Obama demeaning and degrading the presidency.
But they are hysterical about Trump cleaning up the mess which has been made over the last 30 years.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- arn on Abiogenic Oil?
- arn on “It Is Possible”
- Jimmy Haigh on “It Is Possible”
- John B on The Safe Climate Of 1931
- Gordon Vigurs on Abiogenic Oil?
Archives
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
“Oh, no! Trump snubbed the communists who slaughtered 60 million of their own people in favor of one of our openly stated allies WITH WHOM WE HAVE A DEFENSE TREATY! Whatever shall we do!”
This is how mentally ill liberals actually are. This is how they actually behave. Hopefully this is a sign that Trump will undo Nixon’s garbage.
Make Communist China Unrecognized Again!
60 million? That’s it?
Bet the 60 million still vote, not that it would matter.
Carter’s garbage.
Nixon went to play ping pong.
Carter recognized Red China at the expense of Nationalist China (Taiwan), under his one-China policy.
Off topic …
Found this joke on Twitter and thought of you. Sorry, don’t know how to copy the actual picture into comments.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cypv8OjXEAAgPe9.jpg
Save the image to your desktop (or a folder wherever), then browse for the image..
Easy peasy.
like this
One of my favorites:
One of mine:
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7BTnRqeqVxo/Usw2ugazZ8I/AAAAAAAA2Vw/Up68eQgj6Aw/s320/mother_nature_denies_global_warming.jpg
I have a feeling that President Trump will be the first to do a whole lot of things for the first time. And every one of them will cause the NYT consternation and apoplexy.
I can’t wait.
Trump even breathing causes discomfort at the NYT. His speaking caused them to have acid stomach. When he makes cabinet picks it causes them to get really ill. And he’s not even the POTUS yet! I’m sure there are many Grand Mall Seizures in the future for the NYT, complete with foaming at the mouth.
Is this the same NYT that wrote apologies for Stalin’s gulags and mass murders? Now THAT’s diplomacy!
Yes, the NYT of Walter Duranty, apologizing and covering for the Communists ever since.
And Duranty got a Pulitzer for his coverage. Even after being exposed as a lie, the NYTs still hangs his Pulitzer proudly.
BTW – Snow in MA tonight/tomorrow Gail.
The NYT is morally bankrupt. Let us hope that financial bankruptcy is not far behind.
I know another President who upset the diplomatic apple cart a bit in his day. #AshHeapofHistory
Taiwan was one thing, but when Trump called Monaco and asked if they had Prince Albert in a can, that was the last straw!
Tony, I was listening to Mark Levin the other night and he said Trump’s daughter Ivanka is a big believer in Man Made global warming propaganda. I trust you will be meeting with the dear girl soon to show her the truth before she talks her Dad, our Prez elect, to do something stupid. I’m happy with the Donald so far, but he seems to think his Democrat daughter is a genius. Your the right guy to nip it in the bud!! Just in case!!
Give him the Nobel peace prize !
Trump was simply being diplomatic, and wanted to give our friends acorss the water time to adapt to the new paradigm.
This constant attack on Trump is pretty much standard procedure for the Left. They always attack Republicans at every opportunity, especially when Repubicans hold power. Look at the constant smear campaign they waged for eight years against George W. Bush. And they did the same for all previous Republican presidents.
Their attacks on Trump may be a little more vigorous than in the past because today there are many more Leftwing Media outlets than in the past, and because Trump is making them look really bad, so they are fighting back even harder.
The good news is Trump will not be deterred by these attacks, unlike most Republicans. Most Republicans would be crawling off into the bushes to hide, if they had been attacked the way Trump has been attacked. But instead, Trump has the Leftwing Media looking for places to hide. And I love it.
Expect a constant drumbeat of negativity from the Leftwing Media for a time. I do expect that eventually Trump will beat them into submission. Man, this is fun! Go Trump, Go! I’m loving every minute of it.
Just don’t get discouraged when you hear the negative Media. Keep in mind that they represent only a small percentage of Amerian thinking. They DON’T speak for everyone, although they want you to think they do. They only speak for themselves. The rest of us are moving on.
There will be no slack. Everything Trump does will be criticized and we know it. The media could not turn the election and they will not turn us against Trump. Only Trump by his actions or lack there of can do that.
Really we are watching a precipitous decline in the influence of the old media be it the NYT and other papers or the TV “news” like the “major” networks and cable “News” networks.
Trump going straight to the people and using alternate media is just killing them. They have lost their ability to be “the gate keepers” and thus lost their ability to define what the “news” is and what will and will not be reported or emphasized.
Personally I would pull the WH press credentials from CNN for their collusion during the election. I would also rotate on a systematic basis the seats where the different media outlets sit in the WH press room. There is no good reason for the old media to always have their “traditional” seats in the front two or three rows.
I would also make the press responsible for cleaning that damned pig sty up! The WH press briefing forum is and has been a total mess. There is no reason why the people should have to pay for the clean up of that forum and there is no reason why the press should not be made responsible for keeping that space clean. Make the press pay for it as a cost for being allowed in. I would not supply any of the press with anything on the tax payers dime. Not even coffee.
This may all seem like small potatoes but it is powerful symbolism that would be popular with the public. It is the way it should be.
Actually I would use twitter, then GreatAgain.gov for official announcements followed by ‘fireside chats’ broadcast on Rightside Broadcasting, OANN, Breitbart and Alex Jones with an occasional interview with Lou Dobbs, Tucker, Judge Jeannine and Hannity and who ever else treated Trump fairly.
At official press conferences handout paper notices hand written in cursive. And have a press sec answer questions. With ZERO access to the president.
Vindictive? Who me? The MSM deserves NO Courtesy for all their lying.
OT. Gail, do you have a list of links of rabid alarmists saying things that show the climate change scam is far-left anti-human, socialist one-world, anti capitalist, agenda?
Thanks.
What I have is this:
46 statements by IPCC experts against the IPCC
Posted by grumpydenier ⋅ October 8, 2013 link
And a LONG list by Jimbo.
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.”
– Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation.
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony… climate change provides the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
– Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment.
“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.”
– Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research.
“The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.”
– Dr. David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University.
“I believe it is appropriate to have an ‘over-representation’ of the facts on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience.”
– Al Gore, climate Change activist.
“It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.”
– Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace.
“The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.”
– Daniel Botkin, emeritus professor.
There is most certainly a pattern to climate change…
…but it’s not what you may think:
For at least 114 years, climate “scientists” have been claiming that the climate was going to kill us…but they have kept switching whether it was a coming ice age, or global warming.
1895 – Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again – New York Times, February 1895
1902 – “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – Los Angeles Times
1912 – Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age – New York Times, October 1912
1923 – “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – Chicago Tribune
1923 – “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – Washington Post
1924 – MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age – New York Times, Sept 18, 1924
1929 – “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – Los Angeles Times, in Is another ice age coming?
1932 – “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – The Atlantic magazine, This Cold, Cold World
1933 – America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise – New York Times, March 27th, 1933
1933 – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – Federal Weather Bureau “Monthly Weather Review.”
1938 – Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
1938 – “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – Chicago Tribune
1939 – “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – Washington Post
1952 – “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – New York Times, August 10th, 1962
1954 – “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – U.S. News and World Report
1954 – Climate – the Heat May Be Off – Fortune Magazine
1959 – “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – New York Times
1969 – “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – New York Times, February 20th, 1969
1969 – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000” — Paul Ehrlich (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation)
1970 – “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – Washington Post
1974 – Global cooling for the past forty years – Time Magazine
1974 – “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” – Washington Post
1974 – “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – Fortune magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger
1974 – “…the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – New York Times
Cassandras are becoming
increasingly apprehensive,
for the weather
aberrations they are
studying may be the
harbinger of another
ice age
1975 – Scientists Ponder Why World’s Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable – New York Times, May 21st, 1975
1975 – “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind” Nigel Calder, editor, New Scientist magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine
1976 – “Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend” – U.S. News and World Report
1981 – Global Warming – “of an almost unprecedented magnitude” – New York Times
1988 – I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – Jim Hansen, June 1988 testimony before Congress, see His later quote and His superior’s objection for context
1989 -“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” – Stephen Schneider, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Discover magazine, October 1989
1990 – “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy” – Senator Timothy Wirth
1993 – “Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture.” – U.S. News and World Report
1998 – No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, Calgary Herald, 1998
2001 – “Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible.” – Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001
2003 – Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as “synfuels,” shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration” – Jim Hansen, NASA Global Warming activist, Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?, 2003
2006 – “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” — Al Gore, Grist magazine, May 2006
Thanks, A good list for sure. :-)
But what I’m looking for is Club or Rome, Namoi Klein, Orekses quotes on collapsing capitalism etc
ie comments that specifically link to the one world government agenda (lie the 1998 one from Christine Stewart)
The NYT had a conniption fit over Trump talking to the President of Taiwan:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/02/world/trump-calls-to-world-leaders.html
And the PRC has filed a complaint over that phone call.
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/china-lodges-complaint-with-us-over-trumps-taiwan-phone-call/ar-AAl6cid?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
It is quit revealing just how limp wristed our foreign policy has become when it is a big deal that a president elect of the United States talks to the leader of another nation and it pisses off the PRC so the press starts wetting their pants. The press constantly says the POTUS is the most powerful man in the world and yet he shouldn’t talk to the President of Taiwan because it will piss off the PRC? This is what good foreign policy looks like:
No better way to quietly serve notice on China that the game has fundamentally changed than one simple phone call. South China sea, currency manipulation, asymmetric foreign investment policies, dumping, North Korea, … all coming as part of that change. They protest; Trump ignores the protest. Mission accomplished. Obama never learned what TR knew: actions speak louder than words.
Absolutely spot-on with this one. Whose business is it who the president of the United States (be it Trump, Obama or anyone else) speaks to? Nobody else’s business and Trump is being well advised to re-open old contacts. And poor lickle put-upon China can stick their ‘diplomatic offence’ where the sun doesn’t rise as well.
To the press and leftists appeasement = diplomacy.
I suspect Trump understands diplomacy just fine. The Teddy Roosevelt kind: speak softly but carry a big stick. Obama got both parts backwards, as the Syrian chemical weapns fiasco showed. And Kerry didn’t know was a stick is.
And as one would expect the lily livered leftist press is doing their usual hatchet job as if they know better than anyone else what a President should and should not do.
“Donald Trump keeps confirming fears about his diplomatic skills”
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/opinion/donald-trump-keeps-confirming-fears-about-his-diplomatic-skills/ar-AAl5VCp?li=BBmkt5R&ocid=spartanntp
RIGHTTTttt
They guy is a multi-billionaire who closed deals all over the world. Of Course he knows how to negotiate and deal with people from other countries. He also knows their LAWS.
The facts are that the Taiwanese called Donald Trump to congratulate him ( NOT the other way around).
What do these precious diplomats expect him to do ? No take the call and display the bad manners the Diplomats seemed to be suggesting as a course of action.If a few of them don’t keep out of the media they might find themselves needing to update their CVs.
Though she called him the call was prearranged. Trump was not forced into this. He agreed to it before hand and I totally agree with it.
I love it. A person who goes around treating everybody as what they are and not as what the former bozo considered them from his idiotic point of view. A true business man knows how to deal with everybody and still be able to come to a deal which is positive to both sides. One could say that the Donald is more like a true/honest politician than we have seen since Reagan.
We have had politicians running things for way too long. Trump either is a statesman, or is becoming a statesman. That is just what the US needs as its CEO.
With one little phone call PE Trump sends a signal to the PRP that he is not intimidated by them. Genius.
Mad Dog Mattis on Leadership: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EYU3VTI3IU
No wonder the Progressives hate him. He is another great leader.
ALRIGHT! (fist pump)
Jill Stein Fails To Provide $1M Surety Bond For Pennsylvania Recount – Election Challenge Collapses…
This is completely OT but I came across this resource and thought I should post it before I forgot.
This is from a non profit called: Professor Watchlist, a project of Turning Point USA.
It maintains a list of sick professors that have publically professed radical views and teach them.
http://www.professorwatchlist.org/