Proof That Putin Doesn’t Want America Destroyed

If Putin wanted the eight year long destruction of America to continue, he would have worked to get Hillary elected. Like the election hacking Obama did in Israel.

a US Senate inquiry published in June, 2016 actually found that the US government supported a group that had tried to unseat Netanyahu in the 2015 Israeli elections, to the tune of nearly $350,000.

Russian hacking claims vs. Obama’s meddling in Israeli elections | World Israel News

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Proof That Putin Doesn’t Want America Destroyed

  1. gator69 says:

    The eighties are calling now to ask for their foreign policy back.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS2a44F5TgM

    The Deplorables are calling now to ask for their country back.

  2. wert says:

    There is no difference between Russia 2017 and Soviet Union 1939. Both are ready to attack their neighbors, and will do that given chance. That the US is not a neighbor is just luck from your side.

    • Eric Simpson says:

      Instead of using 1939 as the example year why not use the more relevant “post war (WWII) Soviet Union.” Then it’s pretty clear that the Soviet Union had ambitions of global communist expansion. That was a threat. I don’t see that now. At worst they just want to bully their neighbors a bit. At best, they may be in the right with regard to their neighbors, and be a valuable partner with the US in many areas. Including in the fight against the leftist climate loons: Russia’s Putin Says Global Warming Is ‘A Fraud’ http://dailycaller.com/2015/10/29/russias-putin-says-global-warming-is-a-fraud/

      Plus, we in the USA should seek to gain wisdom from Putin’s attitude to potential out of control immigration into Russia:

      On February 4th, 2013 Putin addressed the Duma:

      In Russia live Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, then we advise them to go to those places where that’s the state law. Russia does not need minorities. Minorities need Russia. We better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation.”

      The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a standing ovation for five minutes.

      We need Putin to give his speeches over here!!

  3. Jimmy Haigh says:

    If he’d really wanted to destroy The US it would be President Elect Sanders.

  4. Jeff L. says:

    I applaud Trump for trying to improve Russian relations, but relations are a bit frosty for good reasons. Crimea is still under siege, our goals in Syria are not aligned, and we seem to be killing each others ambassadors.

    • Many of my best friends escaped soviet communism. Clearly nobody there misses altruistic totalitarianism. So it is perhaps natural that if China uses the Dems to parrot and apply its exported its Cyanide-Climate-Kool-Ade policy, the former starvelings of paradisical totalitarianism might be cheering for the some other alternative.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Jeff says “…Crimea is still under siege, our goals in Syria are not aligned….”

      Soros directed the USA to over throw the ELECTED government in both countries.

      The EU is the model for a global government. Soros wanted the EU to annex the Ukraine. The elected president said HE!! NO! so he was ousted and a pro-EU puppet was put in his place.

      Russia tossed Soros out and put out a warrant for him. Russia makes much of their money selling gas to Europe. It also gives them leverage to keep the EU from expanding into their sphere of influence. Soros wants to remove Russia’s leverage by putting in a pipeline from the middle east to Europe. ALL the countries that were opposed have been overthrown EXCEPT for Syria.

      If you want a World Government similar to the European Union then you are on Soros side. If you want sovereign nations you are on the side of Russia.
      *******

      BREXIT THE MOVIE will give you the details on how the EU is actually Run. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTMxfAkxfQ0

      Former World Trade Organization Director-General Pascal Lamy tells you point blank that the EU is the template for the desired World Government and it has been in the plans since the 1930s.

      All had lived through the chaos of the 1930s — when turning inwards led to economic depression, nationalism and war. All, including the defeated powers, agreed that the road to peace lay with building a new international order — and an approach to international relations that questioned the Westphalian, sacrosanct principle of sovereignty… (wwwDOT)theglobalist.com/pascal-lamy-whither-globalization/”

      Lamy is quite blunt in stating national sovereignty is passe.

      …more than half a century ago that the Frenchman Jean Monnet, one of the shapers of post-war Europe, said, “The sovereign nations of the past can no longer provide a framework for the resolution of our present problems. And the European Community itself is no more than a step towards the organizational forms of tomorrow’s world.” His assessment was as valid then as it is now….
      (wwwDOT)theglobalist.com/storyid.aspx?StoryId=8216

      Lamy indicates that an European Union like super state is the goal.

      This is what CAGW — Global warming is really all about. We have all seen the political message morph from Global Warming to Climate Change to Weather Weirding.
      As H.L. Mencken said:
      “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed — and hence clamorous to be led to safety — by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”

      In other words create a crisis to order to implement Diocletian’s Problem-Reaction-Solution

      Mencken also warns “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.”

      The Club of Rome put this concept in another form:
      “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention….and thus the “real enemy, then, is humanity itself….
      humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government. It does not matter if this common enemy is “a real one or….one invented for the purpose.”

      The UN put the concept into practice. The IPCC mandate states:

      The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by the United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) in 1988 to assess the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant for the understanding of human induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for mitigation and adaptation.
      (wwwDOT).ipcc-wg2.gov/

      Pascal Lamy takes ‘Practical Politics’ the next step, by telling us the “new enemy to unite us” is needed to create Legitimacy, one of the three legs needed to implement a global government…

      It gives me great pleasure to be here today to participate in this thematic debate on the United Nations in global governance, an issue of the utmost importance given the urgency of the global challenges we are facing… As for legitimacy, I see two avenues to strengthen it. First, domestically, by increasing the visibility of international issues and giving citizens a greater say….
      (wwwDOT)globalpolicy.org/globalization/globalization-of-politics/global-governance-and-the-three-sisters-2-17/50398-lamy-urges-raising-un-ecosoc-profile.html?itemid=id#951

      There sure as heck is no greater threat for uniting citizens together then the threat of ‘catastrophic climate change’. is there?

      And if that doesn’t work you can always over throw the government and install your chosen puppet.

  5. Don B says:

    Hi Tony,

    This is obviously OT, but I am compelled to communicate the following to you, since you have access to the Trump transition team.

    The presentations you and Dr. Bell made in Australia and to the Trump team ought to be information sufficient to start closed minds in the national press opening a bit, but it probably won’t. The True Believers will no doubt have a knee-jerk thought something like “If those honorable folks at NOAA and GISS adjusted the temperature data, it must have needed adjusting.”

    I believe, based on reactions I have encountered, that a truly simple approach is initially best, and I have leaned on your blog articles for some of these examples:

    The tidal gauge at the end of Manhattan, The Battery, shows that the sea level was rising as fast before the Civil War as it is now. In other words, mankind’s actions could not have started the sea from rising, and we have not changed the rate of rise.
    https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8518750

    This recent sea level rise has been caused by the melting of ice and glaciers since the depth of the Little Ice Age. For example, when Captain Vancouver sailed up the northern Pacific coast in the H.M.S Discovery, there was no Glacier Bay, where cruise ships now cruise.

    “Glacier Bay was first surveyed in detail in 1794 by a team from the H.M.S. Discovery, captained by George Vancouver. At the time the survey produced showed a mere indentation in the shoreline. That massive glacier was more than 4,000 feet thick in places, up to 20 miles wide, and extended more than 100 miles to the St. Elias mountain range.

    “By 1879, however, naturalist John Muir discovered that the ice had retreated more than 30 miles forming an actual bay. By 1916, the Grand Pacific Glacier – the main glacier credited with carving the bay – had melted back 60 miles to the head of what is now Tarr Inlet.”
    http://www.glacierbay.org/geography.html

    Your map:
    https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/03/19/glacier-bay-ice-retreated-50-miles-between-1780-and-1892/

    Glacier Bay glaciers had retreated 30 miles when John Muir visited in 1879, which was 3 years before the first tiny commercial coal burning power plant was built in London.

    “In 1882 a public power station, the Edison Electric Light Station, was built in London, was a project of Thomas Edison organized by Edward Johnson. A Babcock & Wilcox boiler powered a 125-horsepower steam engine that drove a 27-ton generator. This supplied electricity to premises in the area that could be reached through the culverts of the viaduct without digging up the road, which was the monopoly of the gas companies”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_station

    Further,

    Of the 50 USA state maximum temperature records, 36 were set prior to 1940.

    http://ggweather.com/climate/extremes_us.htm

    And,

    Year of Highest recorded temperatures by continent:

    Europe 1977
    Antarctica 1974
    Australia 1960
    Asia 1942
    Africa 1931
    N. America 1913
    S. America 1905

    http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0001375.html

    You get my gist. Thanks for listening.
    Don B

    • Eric Simpson says:

      “This recent sea level rise …”

      I don’t see it. I go down to a beach that I knew 40 years ago and see that it’s just the same as it was. No sea level rise at all. Not even a half inch.

    • Eric Simpson says:

      Also, on 6 out of the 7 continents the record for the coldest day was set AFTER the record for the coldest day: http://www.space.com/17816-earth-temperature.html

      The world record for the hottest day: 1913. Coldest day: 1983.

      The data manipulating / peer-review rigging Chicken Littles would have you believe the planet has just gone through a century of runaway hockey stick warming. Nope! Because if that had actually happened the hottest day records would be very recent, and the coldest days deep in the past. Not so. It’s the opposite in fact. This belies their fear-mongering bullshit.

  6. Eric Simpson says:

    China is our enemy not Russia.

    • Andy says:

      I think both are, but in difference sphere’s politically / monetarily !!!!!!

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        Yes they are but there is an interesting financial link between the spheres. Europe’s Islamophilic elites are redirecting to the Russians the money we’ve sent the Chinese. :)

        Tourists Flee ‘Nightmare’ Paris Amidst Rising Theft, Assaults, Terror

        Tourists from China are avoiding France amid surging violence and crime, a Chinese tourism expert has said, reporting that customers are turning to Russia as a safer destination.

        President of the Chinese Association of Travel Agencies in France, Jean-François Zhou, said “increasingly violent” thefts and assaults are turning France into “one of the worst destinations for foreign tourists”.

        Mr. Zhou, a representative for major Chinese travel agency Utour in France, reported a steep decline in visitor numbers from Asia, and said many tourists are now looking to Russia as a less dangerous holiday destination.

        “In 2016, there were 1.6 million Chinese tourists compared to 2.2 million in 2015. The  number of Japanese tourists dropped 39 per cent, and Koreans 27 per cent. Our tourists have turned to Russia, which is less attractive but at least it is a safe country. For Putin, it is an economic windfall”, he told Le Parisien.

        http://www.breitbart.com/london/2017/01/18/chinese-tourists-flee-nightmare-paris

  7. I have a question about Global Warming and Greenhouse gases. A website that calls itself Rational Wiki airs a graph “explaining” global warming without mentioning water vapor: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/File:Radiative-forcings.svg
    In a section attacking scientists who dare to question the provenance of the Stone Tablets blaming industrial society for alleged warming, there was no pillorying of Rudy. This struck me as most unfair–like setting fire to Urbain Grandier and not Joan of Arc. Can anyone here comment on their graph?

  8. Andy says:

    Putin v Trump is two people who hate to be wrong. I assume both think at this present time both think they are stronger and wanting the showdown.

    I’m not that great a Trump supporter, but think he has Putin here. Putin backs down more than Trump. Slightly.

    Let us see. I think Trump will make it pally and then it will be gloves off. And Trump is more likely to win ever than Obama, once Putin goes to far for Donald. Just hope no nukes landing in my back garden to settle it !!!! #winbutdeadAndy :)

    • Andy says:

      apologies for the bad gramar. Too many windows opened….

    • neal s says:

      I seriously doubt that Trump would actually desire war. He is a builder and not a destroyer. Hillary would be far more likely to actually start a war with Russia.

      War with Russia does not actually do much to MAGA.

      • Andy says:

        War nowadays is more than tanks. It’s computers etc etc.

        And those are like a cold war magnified rather than a hot war.

        We will have cyber cold wars and hot “proxy” wars in foreign countries if Putin has anything to do with it. China on the otherhand has to be careful due to trade, Putin is already under sanctions, has less to lose.

        China will peck away at the south china seas etc without doing all the Russian style moves.

        Andy

        • AndyG55 says:

          Soros etc have been fighting an ideology war against the USA for many years.

          People are only just waking up to the fact that the USA is already in a war to prevent its very destruction.

        • Gail Combs says:

          China worries me much more than Russia because they really hate our guts.

          Lessons of history: China’s century of humiliation: The repercussions of British opportunism in China during the Opium Wars can be felt in geopolitics even today
          and
          China Picks at the Scab to Keep the Wound Fresh
          Don’t forget The Chinese Red Army has been hacking hundreds of companies, universities and even the US government and Oak Ridge Labs.
          ……………..

          Start with the Elites desire for a global government and work from that theory.

          It is China, George Soros, Maurice Strong, now dead, and the bought and paid for Clintons want the USA REPLACED by China as world leader. When you think about it, the easiest way to do that is a hot war between the USA and Russia where China can step in and take over both when the dust settles.

          Remember the Transnationals have already moved out of the USA so they really don’t care if the USA, Russia and the EU get bombed into the dark ages. They are well aware they made lots of money rebuilding Europe the last time so what’s not to like?

          The Sugar Daddy of Al Gore (Jr and Sr) was Armand Hammer, chairman of Occidental Petroleum. In in 1921 he cut a deal with Lenin of the Soviet Union. In 1980, Deng Xiaoping of China said to Hammer, “You were a friend of Lenin. You must come to China and help us, too!” So in 1982 Hammer went to Peking and cut deals with China.

          Maurice Strong, also a good friend of China and Mikhail S. Gorbachev, former President of the Soviet Union created the Earth Charter aka the Declaration of Independence ===> Agenda 21. Al Gore and George Soros have multiple connections with both.

          Christiana Figueres, disciple of Al Gore, and Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention stated:
          “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution… democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China is the best model.

          Between Figueres and Pascal Lamy’s articles it is pretty darn clear the Globalist Elite are NOT in favor of a strong, capitalistic nationalistic USA.

          Putin, unlike Gorbachev, is a nationalist and more of a capitalist than a communist. That is why he is the target of those who salivate over the idea of a world government. Also Russia has China on one side and the EU on the other so Putin REALLY REALLY does not want war. If Putin wanted war he would have backed Hillary.

          The Kremlin Really Believes That Hillary Wants to Start a War With Russia

          Just in case you wondered, the Clintons already are OWNED by China.
          Chasing the Dragon: Clinton’s China Policy

          ….Bill Clinton took contributions he knew came from China, and played another angle as well. US companies wanted to sell China military technology, but the sales were prohibited by law. Economic sanctions for the Tiananmen square massacre and restrictions on technology exports prevented these companies from selling China the armaments they wanted.

          In return for campaign contributions, the President shifted regulation of technology exports from the State Department to the free-wheeling Commerce department. The administration also relaxed export controls and allowed corporations to decide if their technology transfers were legal or not. When easing restrictions wasn’t enough, Clinton signed waivers that simply circumvented the law. The President’s waivers allowed the export of machine tools, defense electronics, and even a communications system for the Chinese Air Force.

          Bernard Schwartz and Michael Armstrong, the CEOs of Loral and Hughes, each donated over one million dollars to Clinton’s re-election campaign. These companies had an interest in seeing China develop reliable missiles to loft their satellites into orbit. Clinton arranged direct talks between Bernard Schwartz and a Chinese general to improve China’s rocket technology. Michael Armstrong was made head of the Export Advisory Council. Both companies were allowed to upgrade the launching and guidance of China’s missiles.

          Clinton even involved the Department of Energy, caretaker of our nuclear weapons, in his fundraising schemes. In 1994 and ’95 then Energy Secretary Hazel O’Leary accompanied Johnny Chung, John Huang, Charlie Trie, and Bernard Schwartz on trade missions to China. Shortly afterward the DOE relaxed security at US weapons labs. Wen Ho Lee, an ethnic Chinese physicist assigned to Los Alamos, illegally transferred data on nuclear warheads to his private computer files….

          And Congress is tossing hissy fits over Trump and RUSSIA??? I would laugh if it wasn’t so serious.

      • Gail Combs says:

        Trump does NOT want war. His son said the reason he finally ran for president is because of the G–d Awful mess Hillary and Obummer made of the Middle East.

        • Gail Combs says:

          The builder in him would cringe at the sight of that.

          He could not stand the sight of NYC deteriorating so, despite his father’s objections, he set out to rebuild NYC.
          (I think that was from one of his partners at the RNC or a rally.)

  9. Andy says:

    All this pro Russia talk.

    What happened to Reds under the beds? I could understand that when President Mikhail Gorbachev was in power but now you are spouting pro russia stance when we have an ex KGB head in charge taking over other countries. Why?

    Is it just that you dislike other people more so and you have got distracted? Don’t get distracted, or else you are doing what Russia wants you to do.

    Andy

  10. Gail Combs says:

    Zerohedge pulled this story.
    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-01-18/russia-snaps-accuses-uk-germany-and-france-grossly-interfering-us-election:

    Investment Watch and others still have it up.
    https://investmentwatchblog.com/russia-snaps-merkel-hollande-grossly-interfered-in-us-election/

    Whether or not Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, actually lost it or not, who ever said/wrote it was correct. France, the UK and the EU did ‘interfere’ in the US election as did Australia.

    I kind of doubt that Lavrov lost it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *