Forty years ago, Steven Schneider of NCAR explained why climate scientists can’t be trusted to forecast climate or handle climate data.
“As a result of the uncertainty, scientists with a belief usually take the data that supports their belief”
30 Jan 1977, Page 20C – Poughkeepsie Journal
This explains the corruption of the temperature record by climate scientists. They are altering data to match their theory.
And when asked about their extreme data tampering, NOAA simply claims they aren’t doing it.
The American public can be confident in NOAA’s long-standing surface temperature record, one of the world’s most comprehensive, accurate and trusted data sets. This record has been constructed through many innovative methods to test the robustness of the climate data record developed and made openly available for all to inspect by NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center. Numerous peer-reviewed studies conclusively show that US and global temperatures have risen and continue to rise. There is no doubt that NOAA’s temperature record is scientifically sound and reliable
- Brady Phillips NOAA January 10, 2017
To ensure accuracy of the record, scientists use peer-reviewed methods to account for all potential inaccuracies in the temperature readings such as changes in station location, instrumentation and replacement and urban heat effects.
By some amazing feat of magic, all of their “peer-reviewed” adjustments (which they say they aren’t doing) exactly match the rise of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And when someone actually inspects their adjustments and shows how corrupt they are, they deny the observations.
It is essential that control of the temperature record be taken away from climate scientists. They simply can’t be trusted with it.
