The New York Times is going off-chart with their climate lies, egged on by top climate fraudster Gavin Schmidt of NASA. They say the Arctic is hot and global warming is making people starve in Africa.
Exact opposite of Gavin’s Arctic claims, Alaska is seeing near record cold, as is Greenland and much of Russia.
Alaska Climate Research Center
Africa is not burning up, rather they are seeing record snow.
Forty years ago, the New York Times blamed African drought and famine on global cooling. Now they blame global warming.
TimesMachine: December 29, 1974 – NYTimes.com
Gavin’s temperatures are fake. They don’t even vaguely match much more accurate satellite temperatures.
Gavin has massively tampered with his own data, to produce meaningless propaganda.
The New York Times blames 124 degree weather on global warming. In 1913, it was 134 degrees during one of NASA’s coldest years on record.
California 1913
Sane policy will never occur while Gavin Schmidt continues to lie to the New York Times, and the New York Times continues to lie to their readers. President Trump should send these fraudsters packing.
Two BIG thumbs up from this aisle seat and the environmental geoscientist sitting in it.
Obummer has left the building…
Dear Tony Heller — how far did you look into the your first reference???
From your first reference, Alaska Climate Research Center:
“The temperature of Alaska for 2016 was a year for the record books. Based on the 19 First Order stations, and the time period since 1949, the five highest temperatures were observed in the following years:
2016 37.2°F
2014 35.7°F
2015 35.3°F
1993 35.0°F
1981 34.8°F”
http://akclimate.org/Summary/2016/Annual
Geeeez!
Obviously a warm year in Alaska proves global warming.
Poor Chris doesn’t understand the effect of the jet stream.
Meanwhile people in Northern Russia FROZE TO DEATH.
https://www.rt.com/news/russia-freeze-cold-temperature-379/
Tell us Chris, which is worse in in your books,
A minor slight warm anomaly in Alaska in winter, or people freezing to death in Northern Russia ?
And yes, we can all see why you might choose to only go back to 1949.
But will he ? Lots of huge protests today, along with statements that his approval rating has dropped precipitously since Election Day to 32%. The lowest of any incoming president. If accurate, and protest energy remains high, it won’t be long before the republican congress turns against him and makes him a lame duck in the first year. It was protests that ultimately cemented LBJ’s unpopularity and drove him from office.
Is that you drewsli? It sounds like you?
Oops I mean DrewsLie! So yer not going by your 190 somethang to no one gives a shit anymore??? LOL!
DID You feel that Bern? LOL!
No. You have no idea who I am.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q5HK9HsBSU
Giggity! LOL!
” his approval rating has dropped precipitously since Election Day to 32%.”
And you BELIEVE the Yellow Stream Media??? The SAME media that donated to Hillary Clinton?
Pat Caddell on ‘Cooked’ Reuters Poll: ‘Never in My Life Have I Seen a News Organization Do Something So Dishonest’
Pat Caddell: Pro-Clinton Media Bias Is a ‘Terrifying Crisis in Democracy’; ‘Clinton Foundation Is Literally a RICO Case Waiting’
Pat Caddell, a DEMOCRAT, is an American public opinion pollster and a political film consultant who served in the Carter White House.
The Yellow Stream Media has lost all credibility:
Only 6% of Americans trust the media – survey
Ratings burn! Turns out folks prefer Home & Garden programing over CNN
Exactly!
Since Brexit and Trump, I’m beginning to wonder whether these “market research” groups do anything other than make up the data.
Actually Mike, they carefully craft their survey and poll questions to get the answers they want. They also carefully adjust the demographics of those polled.
If they will not tell you WHAT questions were asked and WHO was asked, you can write off the poll as Psy-ops.
A classic example of lying by skewing the questions is the survey conducted just after the Tea Party made itself felt during the 2010 election. Findings from the Blair-Rockefeller poll: Tea Party Distinguished by Racial Views and Fear of the Future
1/2 down the page, checkout the wording on the questions in TABLE 2. DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TEA PARTY WHITES & NON-TEA PARTY WHITES NATIONWIDE knowing the Tea party is for shrinking the federal government and returning governing to the states as the Constitution requires.
Questions starting
“Do you think it is the responsibility of the federal government to make sure that minorities have…” are going to get an automatic NO!
This survey was then quoted by every news service with cries of the TEA PARTY ARE RACISTS SURVEY SHOWS!
Trump Leads Clinton In ABC/Washington Post Poll, Even With D+8 Poll Sample… ” The poll sample size of 1005 includes a mix of 33% Democrat, 27% Republican and 35% Independent. Democrats over sampled by eight points, (D+8).” Most of the time they over sample Democrats and under sample Independents.
Reuter was even worse they did a Gavin and erased and rewote old data!
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/08/01/pat-caddell-on-cooked-reuters-poll-never-in-my-life-have-i-seen-a-news-organization-do-something-so-dishonest/
Tom Sowell asks the correct question about what is happening in the USA.
This is like a poll that asks “Do you favor a sales tax increase to increase teacher pension funding?” and then claiming that all who disapproved are against education.
That’s why I said, “if accurate”.
It has me worried, but thanks for the pictures you posted in Tony’s thread above on fake news. I was hoping Tony would post something about it. I haven’t watched much news the past 10 years; it’s made me quite ill. I’ve pretty much only looked at Tony’s site and WUWT, although I don’t even look at Anthony’s site much any more since they don’t seem to acknowledge Tony’s blatant evidence of data fraud. I see little point in all the articles they post when the entire mother-subject is an outright lie.
Ive always enjoyed your posts, Gail., and have for years. Some of the most informative stuff I’ve ever read.
Thanks GW
Using the name of ‘science’ to promote a major fraud offends me.
In the Fake News article, Tony shows Rasmussen has 56% of likely voters approving of Trump. (Rasmussen was bought out by leftists BTW.)
Ugh. When ? It seemed the only one with any accuracy prior to the election, if I recall correctly ?
Why did the republican congress never turn against Obambi and make him a lame duck ?
same dog…..different collar
Same jackboot, different foot…
I like your collar version. May I steal that?
Actually they did on a lot of things and that is why Obama had to try and so much using executive orders which Trump is now going to reverse or alter.
Afraid of being called racist. That was Obama’s get out of jail free card.
That 32% that you cite, yeah, that’s a bold faced lie. Just go look at Rasmussen’s website. That 32% claim is very easily debunked as just as credible as the story about how “Trump removed the MLK bust from the oval office”
Try again GW …
Regarding Phalodi in India recording the hottest Indian temperature ever of 51 degrees C (123.8 F) in 2016, breaking the record of 50.6 set in 1956. A newspaper report from 1919 states that it reached 127 F in Hyderabad. Hmmmm.
http://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/212650353?searchTerm=hottest%20day%20in%20india&searchLimits=
Why do you call him “Gavin?”
We refuse to add Dr and we do not want to insult the other 174,932 people in the U.S. with the last name Schmidt.
How about Gavin Schmidt then?
California’s “permanent” drought ends. Heavy rain prevents Obama from landing in Palm Springs or another golf outing. Need I say more. Mother nature has a way of revealing the truth or exposing fake expertise.
Prince Charles hopes Ladybird book will win over sceptics
Prince Charles hopes the new Ladybird book, which will be available from Thursday, will act as a simple guide to the topic and win over climate change sceptics.
“It does rather seem to me that many people are still unsure about climate change in terms of what is really causing it, how urgent it is that we take action, why we must do that and what might be the consequences if we don’t act right away.”
The 48-page book is in the same style as the iconic children’s Ladybird series from the 1960s and ’70s. The front cover shows an illustrated picture of flooding in the town of Uckfield in East Sussex, replicating a photo of flooding there in October 2000.
The publishers point out that the book was peer reviewed by a group of academics, coordinated by the Royal Meteorological Society, to make sure it was scientifically robust.
It was written in conjunction with Tony Juniper, an environmental campaigner and advisor to Prince Charles, and Dr Emily Shuckburgh, a climate scientist from the British Antarctic Survey.
Mr Juniper told Sky News that the inauguration of President Trump, who has been labelled a climate change denier, has increased the need to make the public aware of the issues.
He said: “I do wonder whether President Trump when he gets the proper briefing, the security briefing, he will see that actually the United States is as vulnerable as everywhere else, in terms of the effects of storms, forest fires, the impact on agriculture and will see that it’s in the national interest of the United States, irrespective of his particular views, to take action on this and I do hope that’s what he’ll be saying come February.”
http://news.sky.com/story/prince-charles-hopes-ladybird-book-will-win-over-sceptics-10738506
First let those ClimAstrologists explain THIS:
I’ll have a pound the BBC give it a ‘review’….like they do for no other books, ever.
Prince Charles is a cretin who doesn’t realize that when compared to his own cognitive ability the average person is an Einstein.
All that inbreeding lowers intelligence…
It may lower intelligence, but it certainly consolidates power and selectively increases sociopathy.
I am proud of my American heritage and I have not forgotten that the British “royal” family is our oldest enemy. At the root of every royal family is a gang which simply accumulated so much power that two successive generations became accustomed to the yoke.
If the NYT’s is really concerned over starving kids, they should demand that the Trillion Dollar Climate Change Industry be scrapped in favor of feeding those at risk. It really is that simple.
The sea ice levels for both hemispheres are noticeably lower than they have been in the past at this same time of the year, based on the satellite record. Does not prove anything, but is a relevant data point.
There have been postings indicating lower levels were reached during the early 1970s, when satellite coverage began to be adequate. It could be useful to try to extend the record backward using this data, if it is still archived.
Tony has posted it several times.
It shouldn’t take much effort to show that his postings occur on government time using government equipment.
If skeptics are ever allowed the ability to actually challenge CAGW it is all over and well they know it. Unpaid skeptics have been accumulating the evidence for two decades.
The latest:
“I’ve done a first pass through the GCM (Global Circulation Model) Model E code.
If “With four parameters I can fit an elephant, and with five I can make him wiggle his trunk” then Model E is structured so that the Elephant can play Mozart while on parade… “ — E. M. Smith
GCM ModelE – Elephants Playing Mozart
Even someone like me, who is ‘computer challenged,’ could follow what E.M. was saying.
Consider CAGW now about to be “Killed”!
Mann-Made Climate Change = bogus computer models and data-tampering. Know-it-alls – charlatans actually, playing with words, sinister sophists, destroying science, liars.
Actual Climate Change is generally too slow to measure; is related to extra-terrestrial causes (solar – and whatever influences the suns dynamics…) and oceanic causes; and earth’s magnetic field; and other causes we call “natural” because we have no idea; and these enormous physical systems interact with one another stirring up the atmosphere – it being gaseous it just follows along for the ride.
That a minute trace gas, CO2, controls the climate is pure, unadulterated nonsense. The tail wagging the dog.
Best way is to reorganize and consolidate all these entities under a different agency…then “Your position has been eliminated.” Solved.
Promote all the losers to the Turkey Farm and then close the Turkey Farm. A time honored method since the government stuck its nose into hiring and firing.
“Heat” over Arctic is a result of greenhouse gases.
Humidity makes it warmer than it would bee if the outgoing radiance was unlimited.
H2O makes a difference!
Atmospheric water has DECREASED over time….
Variations in the total column water vapour in the atmosphere since July 1983. The upper graph (blue) shows the total amount of water in the atmosphere.
It is ozone, controlled by solar UV, that controls the jets that control the swings in temperature over the polls.
The Russians have had an index for jet stream loopiness called the ACI for decades. http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y2787e/y2787e03c.htm#FiguraC
Zonal Atmospheric Circulation Index
Changes in the amount of the sun’s energy radiated in the UV/EUV bands during solar maxima and minima changes ozone formation and destruction in the atmosphere and this changes the position of the jet streams. The more Ozone there is the more the jet streams move to the poles and the less depth to the Rossby waves (loopiness of the jet stream). What we are seeing at present is a long term reduction of about 40% in the EUV and FUV emissions and a reduction in Ozone.
The extra ozone absorbs more UV energy which heats the stratosphere around the equator more during solar maxima than during minima. See
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/04/990412075538.htm (but forget the climate model babble).
That is thought to cause the shift of the jet streams poleward and reverse during solar minima. With the current low maximum in solar activity, the jet streams didn’t shift that far poleward as in previous maxima, thus giving different weather patterns.
The jet stream position is extremely important, as it gives huge differences in clouds and rain patterns and river flows: From the Nile, Po (Italy – Venice) and Portuguese rivers around the Mediterranean to the Mississippi in the US and similar in South Africa. See for the stratosphere-troposphere connection:
onlinelibrary(DOT)wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2005GL024393/abstract
The same solar/ atmospheric circulation shifts connections are seen throughout the Holocene
Nature Geoscience | Letter Regional atmospheric circulation shifts induced by a grand solar minimum
Atmospheric ionization and clouds as links between solar activity and climate, in Solar Variability and Its Effects on Climate
Atmospheric Ionization and Clouds as Links Between Solar Activity and Climate
By Brian A. Tinsley and Fangqun Yu
Stratospheric polar vortex as a possible reason for temporal variations of solar activity and galactic cosmic ray effects on the lower atmosphere circulation
Oh Tony, we passed that signpost a very long time ago!