New Video : As Funding Gets Cut Off, Climate Scientists Ramp Up Their Desperate Lies

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to New Video : As Funding Gets Cut Off, Climate Scientists Ramp Up Their Desperate Lies

  1. RAH says:

    Tony
    Is funding actually being cut to some of these sheisters or are they just reacting to the fear that it will be under the Trump administration?

  2. Kris J says:

    Convincing video

  3. arn says:

    Seems to me that the peak sea level(around) 1930 is higher
    than the low of this decade.
    That’s such a scary sea level rise of 60% and even 600% in the past few years-
    most people may get an heart attack by just looking at the graph.

    What is more amazing to me is
    that according to scientist the oceans “soaked up” most of the man made global warming heat
    (another lame excus…oops fact they needed decades to discover) and caused the the hiatus(which no longer exists after massiv data ‘adjustments’).
    Though the oceans got(officially) so much much warmer there was no increase in sea level rise(according to the danish data in this video).

    And that’s a real interesting fact,as water,just like all other stuff
    in this universe increases in volume when getting warmer.
    This rise in ocean temperatures should have caused a very significant rise in sea level as the averagd depth of the atlantic ocean is 3332 meters(ca 3600 yards) and 4020 meters for the pacific.
    Even if you consider the water-anomalie the sea level rise should have exploded,but somehow nothing significant happens.

    • menicholas says:

      “Seems to me that the peak sea level(around) 1930 is higher
      than the low of this decade.”
      A close look at any of the tide gages time series’ shows a similar pattern: Short term variability swamps long term trends.
      It takes a very long time for the lows of one decade to no longer be exceeded by the highs of decades long past.
      There are lots of places where individual months from nearly a century ago are still higher than many very recent months.

      Besides for that, when it comes to actual coastal flooding, the only thing anyone really has to worry about are large coastal storms and hurricanes.
      These are so dangerous, and the flooding and other damage they cause so extensive and unavoidable, that all people would have to do to avoid ever having to relocate due to sea level rise is simply not rebuild destroyed cities and communities in place.
      In Florida, for example, even if the worst predictions of the alarmists should prove correct (they won’t), odds are that every inch of the coastline will be impacted by at least one devastating hurricane requiring complete a rebuild, long before the gradual encroachment of the ocean threatens anyone.
      And besides, there are methods for protecting development from the sea that were being successfully employed back in the days that wooden wind powered pumps and hand shovels were the only methods available for doing so.

      • arn says:

        You are 100% right –

        i’m just using this example to show how low
        sea level rise in fact is.
        If sea rise would be only half as dramatic as the alarmists are pretending
        it would simply be impossible that sea levels of 1930 and this decade would be on the same level,as there should be such a huge difference in sea level that the peak of 1930 should be much below the low of this decade.

        As there is no difference we can say that absolutely nothing of significance has changed.

        btw-the sea level is the best way to prove the scam.
        If sea level rise would have increased as they claim
        the shape and size of our continents would have changed dramatically
        and we would have lost thousands of islands and beaches world wide.
        As the shape of our continents still are almost the same((even if we ignore change due to seismic and other geological activities and the eroding damage on our coastline caused by wind,waves and rain))
        sea level rise is just the same little nothing as it was in the decades and centuries before the AGW Mafia appeared.
        And it will stay that way until the sun changes her energy output.

        • RAH says:

          They fabricate sea level rise by scabbing satellite data onto the tide gauge data. Just like Mann scabbed the instrument record onto his tree cores when his proxy data did not yield the results he wanted.

          Then to make matters worse according to Paul Homewood, they adjust the satellite data by factoring in glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), which accounts for the fact that the ocean basins are getting slightly larger since the end of the last glacial cycle.

          So the records based on satellite data starting in 1993 are adjusted numbers. It is bad enough that they splice together data from two different sources but even worse that the second source is an adjusted one. This is one reason why the satellite record does not agree with the tide gauge record. There are all kinds of “tricks” that they are using to scare people.

          • AndyG55 says:

            They started “adjustments” some time between 2000 and 2003

            You can see it clearing in this comparison.

          • arn says:

            And one can not teach most of the uneducated how to decode their tricks,
            but by simply looking at a world map from 50 or 100 years ago an comparing them to nowadays world map they will instantly realise that nothing has changed,
            that all is a hoax.
            As our planet is like a puddle.Water volume increase=more earth will be covered by water.
            ((but i guess(as soon as common people start to ask frequently why the shape of our continents hasn’t change and why flat areas,islands and beaches at sea level still haven’t been flooded) our modern priest-scientist will come up with another pathetic excuse like :”the oceans absorbed the sea level rise like they did absorb global warming to create hiatus”.
            Or “evil superskilled man made co2 molecules are surpressing sea level rise.They have increased the weight of our atmosphere so much that seas simply can not rise.”

            But i’m pretty sure sea level rise in 2050…delayed to 2080….delayed to 2110…delayed to 2140…
            will kill us all((delayed to 2070)).
            The good thing is: even in the year 3875
            scientists will find out that we still have 5 years left before AGW ,co2 and sea level rise will kill us all ,but we can avoid it by paying taxes.

  4. Cam says:

    Even NSIDC is acknowledging a much lower melt in Greenland this year. This is only up to the end of June and I’m sure it will be the same to the end of July: Total cumulative melt extent for 2017 is the lowest in the satellite record since 2009. Only 2009, 2006, and 2000 had less melt at this point since 2000. Daily melt extent through June 30 of this year has yet to surpass 20 percent of the ice sheet in any single day, and melting has been confined to lower elevations.

    http://nsidc.org/greenland-today/

    • Kris J says:

      I’m just learning all these charts. This one has to be the dumbest, lamest, website I have ever seen (Greenland Ice Sheet Today)

      Greenland Melt Extent 15%? What the heck does that even mean? 15 percent of stations reported melt on a given day? What kind of lame-brain information is that? Then if you scroll way down, they admit there’s a huge build-up of ice sheet mass, only to obfuscate/minimize it

      The average person is going to look at this graphic and conclude “oh no, the ice is 15% lower” and that’s totally not right

      All these different Greenland websites are beyond a joke. They are 100’s of Gigatons apart from each other

  5. Psalmon says:

    Add to the list that Polar Bears are going to develop a taste for humans…we’re what’s Dinner!

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2017/07/14/wapo-polar-bears-hurt-by-climate-change-could-develop-taste-for-humans/

  6. MikeW says:

    In addition, satellites reveal that coastal areas worldwide have actually added more land area than they have lost over the last 30 years. That’s because local sea levels are dominated by land movements, not climate change.
    https://www.deltares.nl/en/news/how-the-earth-has-changed-over-the-past-30-years/
    http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v6/n9/full/nclimate3111.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *