Email Subscribe
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- rah on Virginia Democrat Loses Wyoming Republican Primary
- Gordon Vigurs on Greens Invent Wind Powered Ship
- Stuart Hamish on That Didn’t Take Long
- Robert L Gipson on Journalism Runs Even Drier
- Jack the Insider on That Didn’t Take Long
Archives
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
New Video : Very High Probability Of Fraud By Climate Scientists
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Thank you.
Please keep up the good work!
The best thing that can happen are deminishing extremes as balanced weather is the best for the people and environment.
Than you usually get more vegetation growth and can harvest more crop.
But i guess this does not fit the official agenda
as you need “extremes” to ‘convince’ people to pay a world wide tax
This draft is being savaged on a lot of fronts and for a lot of its ‘conclusions’. I sent a note to Trump and Pruitt yesterday proving that the attribution section is junk science, and posted a shorter version (with a reference to a previous WUWTguest post longer version) as a comment at WUWT under Paul Homewoods guest post attack on the same graph you discredited so ably. His different attack compared additional charts in the 3rd draft summary but disappeared in the 5th draft summary, which directly contradict the mathematically false graph that remained.
Outstanding as usual .. and breathtaking as usual. I am jaw dropped on the floor how blatantly, in your face, fraudulent these people have become. AMAZING!
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/08/170808145933.htm
Is the acceleration in sea level rises in the said model actual data or “estimate” based on a statistical model? Please comment.
BTW. After so far naming two storms that would never have been given a name a few years ago, the National Hurricane Center has come out with it’s usual revision of it’s 2017 hurricane forecast.
As one would expect they have upped the probability of a greater than active season there by bringing their forecast closer to what the guys at Weatherbell.com had in the first place. Currently there is only one feature in the Atlantic that has any possibility of developing and it’s August 10th.
We’re quickly coming up on what is traditionally the height of the season. late August through September being the most active period of development. So far two named storms, neither reaching hurricane strength at any time, have has noticeable effects on the lower 48.
I’m beginning to wonder if I was wrong to believe that this would be the year when our record hiatus of no majors striking our shores would end because there hasn’t been a major anywhere in the Atlantic yet.
Yes, naming storms is a highly subjective matter. It would appear that every time they find the slightest hint of a circulation and they can find a squall with a 35 mph wind, they give it a name.
Since the Hurricane Center is a NOAA agency, they are no doubt going to embellish and overname these storms for attention and propaganda purposes. Thus it is far better to use landfalling storms as the real indicator of storm activity. If there are no land stations with sustained winds over 74 mph at landfall, whatever they claim to be a hurricane is not really a hurricane.
Sorry. Forgot the link.
http://www.noaa.gov/media-release/early-season-storms-one-indicator-of-active-atlantic-hurricane-season-ahead
BTW total ACE for the NH is only 88% of average for this time of year.
http://models.weatherbell.com/tropical.php
Most of you probably know that Pierre Gosselin posted Tony’s video presentation at his NoTricksZone site:
Expert Software Engineer Calls Level Of Fraud In Leaked US Gov Climate Report “Sickening”
None of Pierre’s usual house trolls have reported for duty yet but I find it interesting that even good people are still willing to make excuses for the fraudsters. This example is a comment from Pierre’s site:
Here is a repost of my response: