Very High Confidence Of Extreme Fraud By Government Climate Scientists

A large group of government scientists are attempting to influence policy by leaking this report to the New York Times. The report is chock full of fraud, lies and data tampering.

Read the Draft of the Climate Change Report – The New York Times

Let’s look at a few of the innumerable attempts to deceive the public in this report.

The first one I am discussing is an attempt to hide the extreme heat in the US prior to 1960 “the frequency of heatwaves has increased since the mid-1960s

The report has one sentence saying “the Dust Bowl remains the peak period for extreme heat.” But immediately below that they have a graph which fails to show the extreme heat of the 1930’s.

This graph above is a classic divide by zero error.  The frequency of both record lows and record highs has decreased. When you divide by a small number, you get a large number approaching infinity – as seen on the right side of the graph above. No serious scientist or mathematician would make that mistake.

Actual data using the most stable set of stations, shows a sharp decline in the number of both record maximums and record minimums in the US. Note that my graph below shows the Dust Bowl, while their fake graph doesn’t.

Extreme heat and cold peaked in the US in the 1930s, and has been declining ever since.

Next let’s look at their claim the number (of days) above 90°F will rise (very high confidence)”

The NOAA actual data shows the exact opposite. The frequency of 90 degree days has plummeted in the US over the past century. You can also see why they are trying to hide the heat prior to the 1960’s – the US was much hotter prior to the 1960s.  Also note that this data is not subject to any adjustments, as NOAA does not adjust daily temperatures. I have very high confidence that these people are not scientists. No scientist would commit fraud like these people are doing.

Final claim I am going to look at right now is this one saying that US temperatures have risen 1.8 degrees since 1901.

Actual NOAA data shows there is no trend in US temperatures, and that the hottest weather occurred eighty years ago.

Note that my graph agrees with this 1989 report from NOAA, reported in the New York Times.

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend

NOAA also reported in 1989 that Earth cooled from 1921 to 1979, and that most global warming occurred before 1919.

07 Dec 1989, Page 14 – Santa Cruz Sentinel

The 1995 IPCC report showed no evidence of troposphere warming since 1958.

ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf

My graph also agrees with this 1999 report from NASA.

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought…. in the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

All of the claimed warming is due to data tampering by these same government agencies since 1999.

 1999 Version   2017 Version

The fact that so many signatories from so many government agencies signed off on this fake report, shows the depths of corruption at government agencies. This is racketeering and fraud – not science.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Very High Confidence Of Extreme Fraud By Government Climate Scientists

  1. sunsettommy says:

    Notice how we don’t get the equivalent of a Griff or Jim Hunt trolling on Tony’s presentations of Government based fraudulent temperature trends, blog postings?

    They are completely silent here.

  2. Kris Johanson says:

    If I hired an Environmental Law Firm to research and produce what you just published above, I would receive a bill for at least $10,000… maybe $20k. Someday I hope you get remunerated for your work

  3. ktyson says:

    Solid work. Unfortunately the battle does not appear to be merely my graph vs. your graph. The battle is over the general acceptance of a preeminent scientific mindset since at least the 1800’s. If bad data and analysis wins, science loses. If outside money sources consistently trump unfettered research, science loses. If technology, the practical arm of science, consistently enables and reinforces these trends with psyche-molding popular memetics designed to obscure findings, science loses. If science loses, we’re back to a modern equivalent of witch doctors and temple priests. This strange rebellion of words and numbers is about the entire stack of civilization, not just some data sets badly handled. Can we hold?

  4. -B- says:

    The divide by zero error is only an error if the audience is smart enough to see it. When called on it, it’s just an error.

    • Kris Johanson says:

      Agreed. People don’t know what a ‘ratio’ even is. They just see the big red bars and that’s enough to make them open their wallets

  5. rw says:

    It’s interesting that they’re still not just making it all up (instead they either omit data or (as in this case) finagle it). They’re probably edging toward that threshold as they get more and more desperate – but now they know that enough people are watching – and that can provide the necessary restraint.

  6. This new hydroelectric scientific formula (E>P+1at) is the near future of renewable energy in the world and it can solve climate change difficulties soon!
    (Ee>Ep+E1at) = (E>P+1at)
    What is the most difficult scientific question of global hydroelectric that no one scientists could the answer to it?
    Now the hard global question!
    How can we produce clean energy in a best way by the potential of water Static head in dams & seas that this water pressure can push to the center of planet?
    Answer:
    This is by getting benefit of joint scientific formula (E>P+1at) with immersion turbines method inside the water of dams & seas (Immersion turbines of series and parallel in zero point of opposite forces).
    Ee= High pressure clean energy that is produced by the water power plants in the depth of water via released fixed potential energy of water natural pressure (More than ten meters of water) with new method (Immersion turbines of series and parallel in zero point of opposite forces).
    Ep= Released fixed potential energy of water natural pressure in water depth (More than ten meters of water).
    E1at= Amount of energy that is consumed at a small pump of one atmosphere power is the ability (In the same place of the water power plant in water depth).
    Many scientists believe that the discovery of the formula is unparalleled. Although many still in shock! How this formula has not be discovered by scientists in the world. Answer to a hard question that scientists are searching for hundreds of years and they can control of climate change and stop global warming soon.
    My new formula and new method can change the world and start a new industrial revolution soon. Note: This new solution and this new formula invention in Iraq and Turkey to formally accepted.
    This invention is patented in Department of Justice in Kurdistan of Iraq No. 952/6 on 12/6/2013.
    http://rudaw.net/NewsDetails.aspx?pageid=110844

    • AndyG55 says:

      When you have something that actually works rather than a little formula, get back to us.

      Formulas DO NOT produce energy. !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.