Always The Same Strategy For Socialists And The Press

When socialists plan to commit atrocities against a particular group of people, they have the press make up fake stories about their target, censor them and boycott them.

That is what the German National Socialist Worker’s Party did in 1934.

13 Jul 1934, Page 1 – The Wisconsin Jewish Chronicle at

Same strategy the leftists who control the US press now are doing to target conservatives, climate skeptics, and any other dissidents who won’t comply with their agenda.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to Always The Same Strategy For Socialists And The Press

  1. Norilsk says:

    The leftists here in Canada want to remove a statue of our first Prime Minister John A. MacDonald from in front of Victoria, BC city hall. Next they’ll be after Mount Rushmore.

  2. RAH says:

    Yep, and Jews remain a perpetual target with only the political opposition having priority.
    It should be remembered that when Dachau, the first of the Nazi concentration camps was established in 1933, it was for the “reeducation” of the political opposition. It evolved into a concentration camp for Jews with the first big influx coming from Kristallnacht arrests in 1938.

  3. Nationalsocialists were really into inherited traits, and the entire culture around Germany and Austria held as self-evident that selfishness or egoism was a “Jewish” inherited trait. Small wonder then that they took their cue from eugenics. “Culling” the selfish was their Christian way of making the world safe for altruism. Consensus based on “revealed faith” backed by initiation of force does not have a good safety record.

    • Gator says:

      “Culling” the selfish was their Christian way of making the world safe for altruism.

      When did Christ command us to “kill thy neighbor”?

      Those that lead this effort were atheists, Hank.

      • Johansen says:

        Big, healthy strong people killing little helpless people is not a Christian virtue and isn’t even part of ‘natural law’. But that is opening up a whole nuther can of worms

      • GCsquared says:

        Gator: “When did Christ command us to “kill thy neighbor”?”
        Quranic passages that enjoin violent jihad on believers are claimed to be “misunderstood” by some Muslim apologists, when they make the claim that fear of Islam is a phobia. The counterpoint, that concerns over violent Islam are rational, is that the theological correctness of the extreme belief is irrelevant, if many in Islam hold that belief.
        Likewise, whether Christ actually condoned murder isn’t the question; it’s whether Christians ever thought it appropriate to kill in his religion’s name. The history of heresy and witch burnings, the Inquisition, and the Religious Wars, including the Crusades, give evidence that there were times when quite a few Christians thought that killing was religiously condoned.
        It’s the responsibility of moderates in any religion to prevent violence in the religion’s name; otherwise it has to be accepted that there’s a sect who believe it does. This is a doctrinal battle within the religion, which we hope will be won by parties with a stronger sense of fairness than the fanatics. (At least I hope we do!).
        To get back to Hank, I haven’t seen many arguments that Nazis were doing what they did because Christianity called for it. I have the IMPRESSION that preservation of German culture was their over-riding goal, and that Christianity was just carried over as a component. Maybe someone else here can comment; I haven’t studied enough to know for sure.

        • Gator says:

          GC, to be “Christian”, you must follow Christ, who never attacked a soul and never told us to attack a soul. Christ was the Prince of Peace.

          To be a Muslim you must follow the example of Muhammad, who personally cut the heads off of Jews. Muhammad was a warlord.

          The inquisitions were orchestrated by men who did not follow the example or words of Christ, and therefore their actions were not Christian. Inquisitions were meant to keep political power for their organizers, and that would be the royal families who ruled at that time.

          The Crusades were an answer to centuries of Muslim aggression.

          There is no comparison between Islam and Christianity, and the actions of men do not define Christianity, only Christ can do that.

          • GCsquared says:

            “GC, to be “Christian”, you must follow Christ, who never attacked a soul and never told us to attack a soul. Christ was the Prince of Peace.”

            These are commendable sentiments, but just because you hold them, doesn’t mean that they’ll be shared universally by other Christians, nor that they won’t be interpreted in a way that condones or even suggests violence. I mentioned the historical examples to show that “opinions vary” (more correctly, have varied.)

            “…the actions of men do not define Christianity, only Christ can do that,” is something an Inquisitor might have said. Heretics got into trouble in the first place for saying that the Christianity du jour wasn’t the true Christianity, so I doubt that adding that what an Inquisitor was doing wasn’t truly Christian either, would have carried much weight. Thankfully, using violence to impose religious conformity has been pretty much excised from Christian doctrine and behavior.

            I broadly agree with your other points.

          • Gator says:

            GC, only Christ can decide who is, and who is not, a Christian. Just as men are allowed to claim to be women in today’s world, anyone can claim to be a Christian.

            I can claim to be the great flying spaghetti monster, but am I? Hansen claims to be a scientist, but his actions show otherwise.

            This is not a difficult concept or distinction. I would love to claim to be a Christian, but that is not for me to claim, only Christ can make that call.

            People who act in un-Christian ways are not following Christ’s example, and are not Christians, no matter what they say.


          • Johansen says:

            Followers of Christ *rescued* Jews in WWII, much to their own family’s risk. There were countless examples; one of the best known is Corrie ten Boom.
            Another classic example of a Christian ‘spoke in the wheel’ during WWII would be Dietrich Bonhoeffer

          • Gator says:


            Bonhoeffer is one of my heroes.

          • RAH says:

            The best Pope of my life time and possibly the best ever, John Paul II, did the same.

        • Bill589 says:

          While people of all faiths and backgrounds commit acts of violence, Islam is unique among world religions in having a developed doctrine, theology and legal system mandating warfare against unbelievers.

          Unless and until that is confronted, Muslims will continue to commit acts of violence against non Muslims, including Christians.

    • Johansen says:

      Eugenics flows directly from Darwin – and his ‘bulldog’, Huxley. There are ‘civilized’ races, and there are ‘savage’ races

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Hank, taking off your Christianity-hating blinders every now and then would open a whole new world to you.

      One would think that a self-proclaimed libertarian understands Progressivism and National Socialism enough to avoid the above drivel.

      I reckon in your warped world the Nazis also killed the disabled, gypsies, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Slavs and anybody else who opposed them because of their victims’ selfishness and to make the world safe for Christian altruism. Did they kill, imprison or drive away Catholic Polish farmers and took over their properties to express Christian consensus?

      Can you spell “ignorance and idiocy”, old sport?

      Your hero Petr Beckmann intensely disliked Catholicism but he was pragmatic enough to work with Christians as natural allies in his fight against Progressivism.

      You may want to take a clue from him.

    • arn says:

      Nazis have not been so much into christianity
      (more into some vril cult stuff and the swastika is not christiaj symbol)
      though the churches tried to appease them.

      Hitler was a huge admirer of islam
      and muslims have been their biggest allies –
      be it arabs,turks,black muslims(hitlers worldwide army was in fact the most multicultural)
      and even in europe in the few places the had a significant population(Krim=Tartars,Yugoslav muslims=Handschar)
      they (re)started the killing of the (guess what) christian population.
      And muslims considered Hitler as a second coming of the prophet
      and whenever Hitlers book Mein Kampf is released in muslim countries it becomes a bestseller.

      And Hitlers Eugenics?
      They were financed by the Rockefellers.
      Hitlers Eugenic Swiss Master Rudin worked hand in hand with the Rockefeller Foundation .
      And his warplanes could not fly without the additives delievered by Rockefellers Standard Oil.
      (it is very similar to eugenics fan margaret sanger.
      Close to the KKK and founder of planned parenthood(which in fact is an orwellian name
      for avoiding parenthood)

      • Gator says:

        … the churches tried to appease them.

        No, Hitler coopted the churches.

        I lived in Stuttgart for three years, and our MWR invited local speakers from various backgrounds to give us a better understanding of the community in which we lived. One in particular was a woman who was in her late teens when Hitler assumed power. She described how on the Sunday after Hitler became chancellor, the Nazis has removed photos of Christ and replaced them with pictures of the Fuhrer, and cosses were replaced with swastikas.

        In July 1933, Hitler unconstitutionally imposed new church elections.

        It wasn’t the church, it was Hitler’s henchmen.

  4. frederik wisse says:

    Muller , the darling of leftist usa , missed his career 75 years ago . He is the prototype of a gestapo officer , except the poor guy was born too late and in the wrong place . his views are outdated and he is following also the rules of the communist secret service by applying the proverb : Give me the suspect and i will find the crime ! This is the rule of law nowadays modernized by the Clintons , Obamas and sorry-to-say also the Bushes .

  5. GW Smith says:

    All that’s needed is the accusation, next comes the self-righteous banishment, and your’e toast, pigeonholed. Not worth bothering with. Any factual truth is now worthless.

  6. Kent Clizbe says:

    What is it with the Hitler, Hitler, Hitler–Nazi, Nazi, Nazi analogies when examining the PC-Progressive attack on Normal America–like shutting down climate heretics’ access to social media?

    While the Hitler/Nazi analogy is slightly apt, the actual analogy that applies here is to the Bolsheviks and Communism.

    You’re bending the meaning of words and ignoring history when you yell “Socialist” and then analogize to Hitler.

    If you’re looking for a historical analogy to today’s PC-Progressive globalist flavor of “Socialism” cloaked as building of an international utopia, then you need look no farther than the Communist International led by the Bolsheviks.

    It’s an exact, 100% parallel.

    Shutting down and demonizing opponents/enemies, thought-crime, concentration camps, re-education camps, wholesale slaughter of political enemies, racial and religious demonizing, and much, much worse–all tactics of the Bolsheviks, the USSR, Communist China, Khmer Rouge, Vietnam, North Korea, Cuba, every single COMMUNIST government.

    The belief systems of our PC-Progs’ are directly descended from communist influence operations: “America is a racist, sexist, hegemonic, xenophobic, imperialist, capitalist hellhole. And it must be changed.”

    They are moving strongly into the Action Corollary: They are changing America, as demanded by their belief system.

    Nothing to do with Hitler, Jews, Muslims, or Christians. Everything to do with Politically Correct Progressivism and its belief system requiring them to destroy Normals and Normal culture/society/economy.

    If you want to know what’s coming next, explore Petrograd 1918. NOT Berlin 1932.

    • Johansen says:

      Kent: “explore Petrograd 1918″… Expand that a little, please

      • Kent Clizbe says:


        Petrograd 1918 was where and when the Soviet Union began–along with its barbaric slaughter, demonization of opponents, and their operations to destroy America and the American way of life, government, economy and culture.

        The first manifestation of the anti-human, anti-humanity, anti-reality cult that provided so much power to the cult members jelled in Petrograd (previously St. Petersburg, later Leningrad), Russia, in 1918. They moved to Moscow later in Feb 1918, but the plans, organization, people, and motivations were all in place in Petrograd, 1918.

        The Bolsheviks were nasty, vicious, amoral, hating killers, to whom human life was nothing. Their belief system was all about a fevered utopian dream for “humanity” but a spitting disdain and hatred for individual humans.

        Petrograd 1918 set in motion the massive hate campaign, control of media, control of information, slaughter of dissidents, suppression of opposition, police state that murdered, starved, tortured, abused, repressed hundreds of millions of innocents. The Soviet regime–and its spawn in China, N. Korea, Cambodia, killed outright hundreds of millions, some in mass murders, many millions with a single bullet to the back of the head. But they also starved dozens of millions. Their total control of those within their borders also created prison camps, concentration camps, the Gulag, work camps, death camps where millions were imprisoned, tortured, starved and died.

        That started in 1918 in Petrograd. Nazi Germany’s actions against its chosen victims were meager and tiny, compared to the vast horror of the Communist crimes.

        The belief system of the totalitarian haters who promulgate the AGW cult is straight out of the Comintern’s influence campaigns directed against the USA since about 1920.

        Their beliefs have nothing to do with Hitler, or Berlin, or Germany. They are pure, 100%, unadulterated Comintern haters.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      There is very little light between the various totalitarian cults but I agree with you that today’s American “progressivism” is a grandchild of the Comintern.

      Then again, the Chinese “Communists” simply didn’t rename themselves when they discovered that that Soviet model of public ownership didn’t work and they transitioned to the National Socialist way of controlling the State and the national economy.

      • RAH says:

        What counts the most is the effect on the people. In that respect their is virtually zero daylight between the two.

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          That. What’s left are some sectarian quarrels, like between Sunni and Shia, or Crips and Bloods, of no importance to the victims.

          But I understand some theoreticians build whole careers on arguing that they are fundamentally different.

  7. RAH says:

    A great one from

    Democrats then and now:

Leave a Reply to arn Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.