NOAA Attempting To Rewrite US History

Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past.

George Orwell  “1984”

NOAA claims the past summer in the US was fourth hottest on record, and tied with 1934.

Summer 2018 ranked 4th hottest on record for U.S. | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

The NOAA claims are not even remotely credible. The animation below shows the spectacular data tampering being committed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to create this fake news. They turn a long term summer cooling trend into a warming trend, by altering the data. NOAA massively cooled 1934, while warming 2018 to bring them to parity.

The average maximum temperature this summer at all 1,218 NOAA USHCN stations was 56th warmest since 1895.

The percent of days over 100 degrees this summer was 78th highest since 1895.

The percent of stations to reach 100 degrees sometime during the summer was close to the lowest on record.

The percent of days over 95 degrees this summer was 85th highest since 1895.

The percent of days over 90 degrees this summer was 66th highest since 1895.

The average minimum temperature was fourth highest, at a blistering 61 degrees.  Most people don’t consider 61 degrees to be hot.

The average mean temperature wasn’t in the top ten.

NOAA created the imaginary heat by tampering with the data. The measured average (minimum and maximum temperature) was much cooler than 1934.

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz

But NOAA tampered with the data to make 2018 just as warm.

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz

This graph shows the magnitude of the tampering.  Older years are made progressively cooler, and recent years are made progressively warmer.

Most of this data tampering is accomplished by simply making data up.  NOAA marks monthly station data which is “estimated” rather than measured with an “E.”  NOAA fabricates 50% of their current data, compared to about 10% of 1970 data.  This allows them to produce whatever result is politically required.

According to NOAA, the Northeast “broiled under record heat”  Actual temperature data for the northeast shows that this summer wasn’t hot at all by historical standards.

To get a feel how much hotter 1934 was, it is best to look at individual stations. Afternoon temperatures at Martinsburg, West Virginia averaged six degrees hotter in 1934 than this summer, with peak temperatures and frequency of hot days much hotter.

Mount Vernon, Illinois afternoon temperatures averaged eight degrees warmer in 1934 than 2018, with peak temperatures and the frequency of hot days in 1934 much higher.

The summer of 1934 was the worst drought in US history, with 80% of the US in severe or extreme drought.

psi-193407.gif (690×488)

The heat was so extreme that hundreds of people were dropping dead in the streets.

21 Jul 1934, Page 1 – Corsicana Daily Sun at Newspapers.com

The 1930’s was by far the hottest and driest decade in the US, and millions of people fled the Great Plains and moved to California.

Steinbeck documented this in “The Grapes of Wrath.”

Even the EPA recognizes that the summer of 1934 was extremely hot.

Climate Change Indicators: High and Low Temperatures | Climate Change Indicators in the United States | US EPA

NOAA is no longer making any attempt to appear credible.  They recognize that newspapers and politicians won’t call them out, and that they can get away with any level of fraud they consider necessary to keep their global warming narrative alive.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to NOAA Attempting To Rewrite US History

  1. Jan-Åke says:

    Hello Steve ,have you spoke to NOAA on the phone or emailed them ?
    If so ,what are their excuses, if any ?

    • tonyheller says:

      NOAA won’t talk to me. Judith Curry sent them some of my work, and they told her their algorithms were “working as designed”

      • Weylan McAnally says:

        Algorithms used to determine temperature? 50% of temps estimated? What could go wrong?

        Look, just trust us. We are the experts. We can give you accurate temperature data down to the 1/100th of a degree.

      • Nutation_discombobulation says:

        An excellent damning post Tony, “working as designed” yeah, to deceive, and defleece, they’ve been caught with their pants down round their ankles.

        Maybe this man will flush the maggots out of the carcass? He’s got the hoodwinked greenies worried https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-climate-denier-happer-2602295674.html

        But then again, when a shadow regime can cause the truth to be withheld from a nation in exchange for disinformation, such as JFK – Demona, USS Maddox – Vietnam, 9/11 – war on terror, etc. etc. etc. to drive NOAA, and NASA with an agenda is simply childs’ play to these narcissistic sociopaths.

        What we need is a sociopath meter to ensure none enter any bureaucratic agencies. The sad fact is they are all attracted to politics and positions of power, and they are inborn liars and self serving cheats, it just comes natural to them, and all the humble can do is sigh ad infinitum.

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          Like father, like son. When power-hungry sociopaths can get elected by the people again and again it’s only logical that they will also enter the bureaucracy.

          The U.S. Constitution assumed that some people are power-hungry sociopaths and it severely limited the government’s power to discourage them from seeking office.

          Unfortunately, intelligent sociopaths realized long ago that they can find “progressive” electoral majorities to first sidestep and then completely undermine the Constitution.

          The American people were supposed to be the sociopath meter but for the most part they failed just as many Founders feared they would.

          This year’s election is crucial.

      • sunsettommy says:

        They LIED about it, that is what I see.

  2. AndyDC says:

    Excellent post! How can anyone possibly argue with pure, unadulterated data? Obviously with minimum temperatures, increasing urban heat island effect is very important, thus any adjustments should cool the present and warm the past. They are doing just the opposite of what common sense should tell you!

    • Nutation_discombobulation says:

      x 2 exactly. The same antithetical algorithm was used by NIWA in New Zealand, and the Australian BoM, so it must be the same cheat sheet standard being used earthwide.

  3. frederik wisse says:

    The nice thing here is history repeats itself . In Russia the czars are back , in the USA the settlers are regaining control of their nation . Have faith and the manipulation of facts by some bureaucrats is despicable , but will only last as long as we are allowing them .

  4. Johansen says:

    Incredible… This is the raw material for at least 10 PhD dissertations in sociology, psychology, economics, and political science
    Any Writers out there? Journalists? You’ve got half your research done for you already. Law Firms?…. you’ve got about half a $million of discovery already done

    • Nutation_discombobulation says:

      My hope as well, what kudos awaits the investigative reporter who exposes this traitorous deceit.

    • gregole says:

      Johansen,

      You’re onto something. I’ve thought to myself that once this particular public fetish about CO2 passes, as it will; time will simply bury it – it’s been well enough documented that it will provide fodder for study for decades. Psychology. Comparative religion. Sociology. Comedy. Oh. It’s already comedy.

  5. Cam says:

    Interesting sea level data from NOAA. After the last super El Nino, they had the rise at 3.4 mm +/- 0.4 mm per year. Because there has been a flat-lining since then, the trend is down to 2.9 mm +/- 0.4 mm. I’m sure they’ll blame satellite error soon enough and adjust it.

    https://www.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/sod/lsa/SeaLevelRise/LSA_SLR_timeseries_global.php

  6. Josh says:

    Why doesnt friendly websites like Fox News highlight Tony’s great effort?

    • Johansen says:

      It’s too much for people to swallow, even many conservatives. It’s like telling people, “everything the government tells you is a lie, all the major news media bigwigs are molesters and cheats, half of the U.S. Congress is actively involved in espionage conspiring against the U.S., the Clintons still trade in secret documents putting lives at risk, and so on and so on. People just can’t handle it. It’s like saying everything in your safe little world is upside down

      • Josh says:

        I think us conservatives realize our nation has dems obstructinng , FBI attempting to impeach Trump, AGW is hype, temp records are bs, and rinos are foes

      • Disillusioned says:

        Johansen,

        You’re talking about people who can’t risk becoming disillusioned. It was very hard on my psyche. I had a knot in the pit of my stomach. I was physically ill when my little world turned upside down.

        But I got through it. They can too. Disillusionment is a good thing.

        • Colorado Wellington says:

          Yes, it is.

          It’s healthy for a man’s spirit to feel embarrassed about beliefs he accepted—and repeated, sometimes loudly—without questioning them.

          I know.

  7. spike55 says:

    OT, DMI Arctic sea ice volume has it second negative loss in a row.

    ie, looks like its turned the corner.

    • Cam says:

      And NSIDC had extent increase yesterday. Of course, two days earlier they dropped the extent by 73,000 sq km so this year would fall below last year by 10,000 sq km. It will end as the 8th lowest in the satellite record.

  8. Typical Leftist says:

    So what?!?

  9. GW Smith says:

    Great effort, Tony! Keep it up! More people have got to see your stuff.

  10. Buck Turgidson says:

    Well done! The quality and quantity of your work are remarkable. Too bad the govt cant be trusted to provide honest results.

  11. oldscout says:

    Tony, perhaps you’ve explained this in previous posts, but how can half of present data be interpolations rather than direct measurements? I thought essentially all stations were automated and use electronic thermometers and remote data collection. Weather Underground has thousands of hobbyist stations broadcasting these data continuously, usually updated at least every few minutes. Is the US government using equipment below the standards of the weather kits sold at Walmart?

    Sometimes when you use Occam’s razor to pare away the convoluted explanations, what remains does resemble a conspiracy.

  12. CheshireRed says:

    Deafening silence tells us all we need to know about NOAA’s position here. No protests, letters pleading innocence, no calling out Tony, no court cases, nothing. Just golden silence. I wonder why that could be so?
    Really wish Trump would show some imagination on these guys. Call a debate, demand an explanation or maybe even just summon them to a hearing under oath. ‘Climate change’ fraud needs to be nailed while Trump is in the drivers seat as once he’s gone the next guy may not be so interested in debunking this garbage.

  13. Randy B says:

    If Floyd Landis, under Whistleblower, can claim a cool mil by exposing Lance Armstrong as defrauding the USPS (Armstrong recently settled for $5mil fine Landis gets 10% (I think) then why can’t someone on the inside (@NOAA) do similar? This fraud hurts way more people than Armstrong, etc. Where is the guy who pursued Armstrong? He’s got a new target for defrauding the govt.

    • Gator says:

      If Floyd Landis, under Whistleblower, can claim a cool mil by exposing Lance Armstrong as defrauding the USPS (Armstrong recently settled for $5mil fine Landis gets 10% (I think) then why can’t someone on the inside (@NOAA) do similar?

      The Deep State. Lance Armstrong was not a leftist politician, and he tarnished one of the Deep State’s pet projects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.