In January, the New York Times said California was at risk from huge fires, because of forest mismanagement.
“California Today: 100 Million Dead Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires”
Mark A. Finney, an expert in fire behavior for the U.S. Forest Service and an author of the study, says California forests are much more vulnerable now because, paradoxically, they have been better protected. In their natural state, forests were regularly thinned by fire but the billions of dollars that the state spends aggressively fighting wildfires and restrictions on logging have allowed forests to accumulate an overload of vegetation.
How might the dead-tree forests affect California? One of the most striking concerns is the damage the fires might do to watersheds. Intense, hot-burning fires could disrupt forests’ ability to channel water into the Sierra reservoirs that provide cities like San Francisco with drinking water. That’s a scenario that could nudge the state into rethinking its forest management.
California Today: 100 Million Dead Trees Prompt Fears of Giant Wildfires – The New York Times
President Trump agreed with them.
The New York Times then fact checked the claim, and said that it isn’t true. Apparently facts change as needed to suit the latest fake news cycle.
Trump’s Misleading Claims About California’s Fire ‘Mismanagement’ – The New York Times
h/t Cole Matthews
