In the November 1976 issue of National Geographic, they showed a Little Ice Age followed by a sharp warming spike to 1940, and then cooling back to 1880 levels.
The National Geographic Archive | November 1976 | page 1
This cooling back to 1880 levels was also shown by NCAR, and the National Academy of Sciences.
21 Jul 1974, 13 – The Des Moines Register at Newspapers.com
1975 National Academy Of Sciences Report
The warmth of the 1930s/40s and subsequent cooling was well documented.
2 Nov 1922, Page 1 – Great Bend Tribune at Newspapers.com
29 Sep 1939 – What is The World Coming To? – Trove
17 Dec 1939, Page 15 – Harrisburg Sunday Courier
18 Feb 1952 – POLAR ICE THAW INCREASING
This warmth of the 1930s and 1940s, turned rapidly into cooling and fears of a new ice age.
U.S. and Soviet Press Studies of a Colder Arctic – The New York Times
12 Jun 1975, Page 10 – The Ogden Standard-Examiner at Newspapers.com
TIME Magazine Archive Article — Another Ice Age? — Jun. 24, 1974
March 2, 1975 – B-r-r-r-r: New Ice Age on way soon? | Chicago Tribune Archive
The post-1940 cooling ruined the global warming story, so NASA and other climate scientists erased it.
This strategy of hiding the warm past was openly discussed in Climategate E-mails.
But that was just the beginning. The removal of the post 1940’s cooling, paved the way for “Mikes nature trick” to “hide the decline“ in the proxy data – and erasure of the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.
Prior to erasure of the Medieval Warm Period by Michael Mann, NASA’s James Hansen in 1981 showed a Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.
Global temperature trend is based on temperatures in central England, the tree limit in the White Mountains of California, and oxygen isotope measurements in the Greenland ice (W. Dansgaard of the Geophysical Isotope Laboratory, University of Copenhagen, pers. comm.), with the temperature scale set by the variations in the last 100 years
The 1990 IPCC Report showed a Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age.
But climate scientists plotted to erase the Medieval Warm Period, and that is exactly what they did.
U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works
By 2001, the Medieval Warm Period, Little Ice Age, and post-1940 cooling had been officially erased. Just as the climate scientists planned to do.
The Medieval Warm Period was well documented history. Greenland was much warmer a thousand years ago.
The pattern of climate scientists plotting to erase past warm (and cold periods) is well established, and completely fraudulent. NASA has doubled pre-2000 warming over the past 19 years.
And NOAA has turned a long-term US cooling trend into warming.
NOAA US Data Tampering Update | The Deplorable Climate Science Blog
This fraud is being committed blatantly, right in front of everyone’s eyes.
Leftist scumbags were revising history long before they started tampering with weather/climate data. They are past masters at BS revisionism. As far as I’m concerned, if your an academic in history or in any field in which you publish on climate, your low life liar until proven otherwise.
Without the internet, it would be almost impossible to expose and refute any of this stuff. Hence the tsunami of censorship and de-platforming.
It relies on “errors” being made and hopefully going unnoticed:
https://www.scribd.com/document/397394288/The-Big-Mistake
Ha! Ha! What a waste of energy! Let’s add the largest TRAIN WRECK in California history to their failed science. Most of this is coming from California’s massive democracy (socialism). It’s about time to make it a country of its own. I doubt that all of the millionaires/billionaires will continue to finance their stupidity and ignorance for very much longer.
Evil is not dumb, but goodness can be very gullible, believing that others are just as rational and fairminded as they are. The left knows this, and will never back down.
And the gullible must learn the hard way:
https://pjmedia.com/trending/panera-breads-socialist-pay-what-you-want-experiment-fails-miserably/
I thank our host again for this fine work, it’s sufficient proof of fraud for me and has been since I started visiting this site. And you didn’t even need to include a Seth Borenstein article!