An overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop one hundred degrees below the freezing point.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
- The Origins Of Modern Climate Science
- If An Academic Said It, It Must Be True
- Record Snow Cover
- Stopping Climate Misinformation
- Arctic Ice Free In Two Years
- “Decades Of Scientific Research”
- The Atlantic : Tesla Bombings Not Politics Or Terrorism
Recent Comments
- william on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- arn on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- arn on Precision Taxation
- william on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- william on Precision Taxation
- william on Precision Taxation
- arn on Causes Of Earthquakes
- william on Precision Taxation
- Robertvd on Precision Taxation
- arn on On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
So if we had 20 degrees of global warming added to that, the resulting 80 degrees below freezing would seem like Miami weather ? No amount of any kind of global warming will ever make that environment comfortably suitable for humans.
Merry Christmas everyone.
And a Happy Hanukkah = Khanukkah Same’akh” (????? ???).
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
It always amazes me how global warming can make the temperatures drop.
If if wasn’t for global warming, they would be -73 instead of -71.
Please, “Real Science,” explain how an “overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop”.
How does heat in a neighboring region cause local temperatures to drop? This assertion defies the laws of physics. Without some external force at work, concentrated energy dissipates.
A warmer Arctic would imply a warmer Greenland. Temperatures decrease as latitude increases, not vice versa.
Science? Or sensationalism?
I’m not sure. That has me a bit confused too. I’m hoping that James Hansen can explain it from his flooded Manhattan office.
Some research to help you understand:
Sarcasm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
Humor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour
Satire: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire