An overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop one hundred degrees below the freezing point.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
Recent Comments
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Peter Carroll on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
So if we had 20 degrees of global warming added to that, the resulting 80 degrees below freezing would seem like Miami weather ? No amount of any kind of global warming will ever make that environment comfortably suitable for humans.
Merry Christmas everyone.
And a Happy Hanukkah = Khanukkah Same’akh” (????? ???).
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
It always amazes me how global warming can make the temperatures drop.
If if wasn’t for global warming, they would be -73 instead of -71.
Please, “Real Science,” explain how an “overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop”.
How does heat in a neighboring region cause local temperatures to drop? This assertion defies the laws of physics. Without some external force at work, concentrated energy dissipates.
A warmer Arctic would imply a warmer Greenland. Temperatures decrease as latitude increases, not vice versa.
Science? Or sensationalism?
I’m not sure. That has me a bit confused too. I’m hoping that James Hansen can explain it from his flooded Manhattan office.
Some research to help you understand:
Sarcasm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
Humor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour
Satire: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire