An overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop one hundred degrees below the freezing point.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- El Nino To The Rescue
- Bullseye!
- It’s Getting Closer
- Greenland Meltdown Scam
- Greenland Ice Update
- Wyoming Gold
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
Recent Comments
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Stuart Hamish on Bullseye!
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Terry Shipman on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- Jack the Insider on El Nino To The Rescue
- Bob G on El Nino To The Rescue
- conrad ziefle on El Nino To The Rescue
So if we had 20 degrees of global warming added to that, the resulting 80 degrees below freezing would seem like Miami weather ? No amount of any kind of global warming will ever make that environment comfortably suitable for humans.
Merry Christmas everyone.
And a Happy Hanukkah = Khanukkah Same’akh” (????? ???).
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
It always amazes me how global warming can make the temperatures drop.
If if wasn’t for global warming, they would be -73 instead of -71.
Please, “Real Science,” explain how an “overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop”.
How does heat in a neighboring region cause local temperatures to drop? This assertion defies the laws of physics. Without some external force at work, concentrated energy dissipates.
A warmer Arctic would imply a warmer Greenland. Temperatures decrease as latitude increases, not vice versa.
Science? Or sensationalism?
I’m not sure. That has me a bit confused too. I’m hoping that James Hansen can explain it from his flooded Manhattan office.
Some research to help you understand:
Sarcasm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
Humor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour
Satire: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire