An overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop one hundred degrees below the freezing point.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- Jimmy Haigh on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- Gamecock on The Anti-Greta
- William Capron on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on “a persistent concern”
- conrad ziefle on The Anti-Greta
- arn on “a persistent concern”
- Margaret Smith on “a persistent concern”
- arn on Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
So if we had 20 degrees of global warming added to that, the resulting 80 degrees below freezing would seem like Miami weather ? No amount of any kind of global warming will ever make that environment comfortably suitable for humans.
Merry Christmas everyone.
And a Happy Hanukkah = Khanukkah Same’akh” (????? ???).
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
It always amazes me how global warming can make the temperatures drop.
If if wasn’t for global warming, they would be -73 instead of -71.
Please, “Real Science,” explain how an “overheated rapidly melting Arctic is causing Greenland temperatures to drop”.
How does heat in a neighboring region cause local temperatures to drop? This assertion defies the laws of physics. Without some external force at work, concentrated energy dissipates.
A warmer Arctic would imply a warmer Greenland. Temperatures decrease as latitude increases, not vice versa.
Science? Or sensationalism?
I’m not sure. That has me a bit confused too. I’m hoping that James Hansen can explain it from his flooded Manhattan office.
Some research to help you understand:
Sarcasm: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm
Humor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humour
Satire: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satire