Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
Recent Comments
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- Patrick Powers on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- dm on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Charles Higley on Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- stewartpid on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- arn on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Disillusioned on Time Traveling Satellites
- Disillusioned on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
A couple ice cubes are missing. It’s much worse than we thought. We are doomed!
Sea Ice extent looks very close to the 1979-2000 Median, Where’s the problem? Oh, I see, If the Ice continues to grow and accumulate further it will become a hazard for a lot of people during winter. .
Sparks,
Funny last year the sea ice extent was even LARGER. Must have had a pretty high sea ice minimum last September. But maybe there is actually more to it than that.
Gosh, it looks like the Arctic may not be ice free after all! Of course it is getting harder for me to see my monitor through all the ‘blue steam’.
Steve,
you REALLY want to go there with this issue again?
So if sea ice extent is almost normal now, does that mean you are predicting sea ice extent minimum will be around 6 mil Sq KM? I am ready with my bet right now if you are. Hell I will even bet on the Houston Astros again for the World Series. They CAN’T be as bad as last year, right?
of course you might want to ban me now, so you don’t have the embarrasmment of banning me right before you were shown to be so incredibly wrong last year with that silly “lying” accusation.
Who ordered the storm in August that broke up the ice? Why did Shell run from an imaginary 83 mile iceberg that didn’t even show up on the ice maps? Why did Glacier Bay melt 65 miles x 4000 ft thick x 1 mile wide 100 years before the industrial revolution? Stuff happens, its meaningless 2% of the surface drivel when winter arrives.
Do you really want to fix the problem? … Why when a fish population is at risk of crashing, they limit the catch, but when ice extent is at risk of crashing, they don’t limit ice breakers. What used to be one solid piece of ice becomes tens of thousands of jostled, bumping, crashing pieces of rotten ice, more easily destroyed by storms and currents.