Leading Democratic Minds Compare Climate Change To Gay Rights

8 Responses to Leading Democratic Minds Compare Climate Change To Gay Rights

1. Ivan says:

   January 30, 2013 at 7:45 am

   He’s got a point there.
   If they get their way on “climate change” we’ll all be taking it up the arse.

   Reply
2. Eric Simpson says:

   January 30, 2013 at 10:10 am

   U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, one of Congress’s few outspoken environmental advocates, is making a new argument for legislative action on climate change: Lawmakers who oppose future measures to reverse global warming, Whitehouse argues, will pay a price — in votes.

   That’s why we need a well-financed advertising campaign to change public opinion on AGW!
   I’m talking to you, you think about doing what you can do to help organize a PAC. An effective campaign will be largely self-supporting $, as conservatives will donate en masse. Turn the tables on that crazy left wing scare-mongering nutcase Sheldon Whitehouse. http://chosun1.wordpress.com/2009/12/26/sheldon-whitehouse-just-another-statist-buffoon/
   And, oh, manpig again. Hard to deal with seeing that grotesque visage.

   Reply
   • Russell Cook (@questionAGW) says:

     January 30, 2013 at 6:49 pm

     ” … a well-financed advertising campaign to change public opinion on AGW! …

     A.k.a. one that will “reposition global warming as theory rather than fact”. I described how that very phrase, which in a completely generic sense is a very good idea, has been used as a weapon against skeptics for over 20 years in an out-of-context portrayal insinuating a sinister top-down industry directive to ‘manufacture doubt’ about the issue. Please see “Monumental fault in manmade global warming notion hiding in plain sight” http://ow.ly/h9wy4

     For whatever PAC you propose, I suggest a two-prong assault: 1) state the skeptic climate assessments in the clearest possible manner, continually noting how they are supported by peer-reviewed science journal-published papers, and, 2) clearly show how the AGW side runs from debate, resorts to character assassination of its critics, and more egregiously, sees the need to manufacture doubt about the credibility of skeptics by twisting a noble 1991 effort to educate the public into a literally unsupportable, potentially libelous/slanderous accusation.

     BTW, dealing with Al Gore is quite easy. Show how his fingerprints are seen on the efforts of point #2 above: “Pt II: Is Gore’s Accusation of Skeptic Climate Scientists Still a Hoax?” http://ow.ly/heyKj

     Reply
3. Mike Mangan says:

   January 30, 2013 at 12:28 pm

   One of the few faces that would actually look better after flying through a windshield.

   Reply
4. miked1947 says:

   January 30, 2013 at 1:13 pm

   Have pity on those of us that were about to eat this morning! 😉

   Reply
5. gator69 says:

   January 30, 2013 at 1:43 pm

   That’s because they cannot compare it to anything scientific.

   Inside the leftist brain… “inhale, exhale, emote…”

   Reply
6. Andy DC says:

   January 30, 2013 at 1:44 pm

   All we need is another tax with this sick economy, as well as a carbon futures market, where rich insiders can manipulate the cost, while skimming billions off the top. While the average person pays much more for energy.

   Reply
   • tckev says:

     January 30, 2013 at 8:38 pm

     It works in Europe…
     /sarcoff

     Reply