Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Dayna on Seventeen Years Of Fun
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
One of these should be handed to every law abiding US Citizen as they exit their polling booth.
Printed down the side it should say ” I VOTED “.
You know that is just a piece of hardware only used in the Army’s landforce combat simulator, right?
I noticed that it’s not a “standard issue” weapon.
I present the concept of going to vote and being rewarded with a gun in the spirit of the second amendment. It beats an “I VOTED” paper sticker.
Simulator or not, everybody can improve with target practice.
I like the concept.
It feels just like a real weapon with the kick but no bang, so no ear defenders required. If you ever get the chance to try it out do it.
Slightly more than half of the voters in 2012 voted for Obama. I don’t want them to feel THAT empowered, they already think they “own” the country (as the present “surge”–note the military term–in climate and gun control alarmisms well demonstrate). The Insane Left, I call them, and they have been reinvigorated by Obama’s re-election.
H M The Queen shows excellent gun control as well – http://www.anenglishmanscastle.com/Her%20Majesty%20Shooting.jpg
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100162037/queen-with-a-gun-try-abolishing-this-republicans/ – an even better picture of our leader at work, the URL says it all
You know, a nice ad would be a picture of a woman with a real assault rifle (not just a semi-auto) and a caption that says, ” Why do liberals fear a woman with power?”
Sarah know how to shoot and pull a gill net. What more could a man want.
Why the hell did she not run?
Because the left media machine destroyed her in the eyes of the voting public. Once McCain announced her as his running mate there was a day or so of the media fawning over her hunting and fishing ways and her rise up the political ladder but that rapidly devolved into one of the greatest smears ever accomplished against a candidate. Armies of left wing reporters descended on Wasilla with orders to search and destroy. They feared her immensly and realized they had to take her down ASAP.
If only they had dug into the Kenyans past as their job description demands…
In retrospect, it’s easy for me to say on afterthought that Sarah Palin would have been a lot better choice then the Mr. Mushhead that was nominated. We all knew that Romney was big trouble for us, but with his nomination things unfolded almost like some horrible Twilight Zone. Sarah Palin? At least we would have someone with obvious conviction, and someone that is perhaps the best plain talking spokesmen, in a Reaganesque way, for the conservative cause. Should we have nominated her? Yes, we couldn’t have done any worse that with the Romney disaster. Of course, she didn’t run, but whatever.