Shock News : Commander In Chief Using Soviet Tactics To Consolidate His Hold On Power

A West Point think tank has issued a paper warning America about “far right” groups such as the “anti-federalist” movement, which supports “civil activism, individual freedoms and self-government.”

The report issued this week by the Combating Terrorism Center at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y., is titled “Challengers from the Sidelines: Understanding America’s Violent Far-Right.”

The center — part of the institution where men and women are molded into Army officers — posted the report Tuesday. It lumps limited government activists with three movements it identifies as “a racist/white supremacy movement, an anti-federalist movement and a fundamentalist movement.”

The West Point center typically focuses reports on al Qaeda and other Islamic extremists attempting to gain power in Asia, the Middle East and Africa through violence.

West Point center cites dangers of ‘far right’ in U.S. – Washington Times

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Shock News : Commander In Chief Using Soviet Tactics To Consolidate His Hold On Power

  1. Sundance says:

    “That government is best which governs least”
    – Henry David Thoreau

    Yep Thoreau was a terrorist. So was Thomas Jefferson.

  2. Pathway says:

    The question often arises as to whether or not the military will side with illegal orders from the President and fire on civilians or will they stand for freedom and liberty.

    • gator69 says:

      Our military pledges an oath to defend the constitution, NOT the president.

      “The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned officers are as follows:

      “I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).

      “I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)”

      http://www.history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html

  3. Streetcred says:

    The west point think tank might be better advise to look more closely at the cause … domiciled in Washington.

  4. Andy DC says:

    It will be surprising if there isn’t some significant civil disorder over the next four years. They will be branded by the media as kooks, racists and malcontents. More Wacos in the making.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *