This video will blow you away. What are we dealing with here? This is possibly the most disturbing video I have ever seen.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCqOMdcutWQ]
Big smile, bright eyes, relaxed, clear voice and cheerful – until the moment he thinks that they started filming.
I have been watching this and several other related videos the past few days. There are many things rotten in Denmark with this entire Sandy Hook thing. For instance, what 6 year old, within 24hrs of a tragedy like this, suddenly finds themselves compelled to pen a letter to Obama asking that all guns be banned? This letter was spontaneously, live on broadcast television, presented to Anderson Cooper, on spur of the moment, live, at the time, spontaneously, and did I mention live? But magically CNN had a SCANNED version of it presentable in an overlay graphic. I guess I never realized the awesome powers of CNN to instantaneously scan and produce a graphic overlay on live television like that. Why are they not operating our instant replay for the NFL?
Again, this is just one of dozens of crazy and miraculous situations surrounding this event.
Another has to do with the little girl that posed with Obama that was supposed to have died. Or another supposed parent and her husband that just happen to not be who they are purported to be, and in fact are actors from Florida, but to further this spooking coincidence, is the supposed cousin of another victim that just so happens to be found in several photographs with the “actor” couple I just mentioned, and yet have been depicted to be completely unrelated.
There are sooooo many very strange and messed up things with this whole thing. I sure hope someone is working up the explanations and, more importantly, the “proofs” of those explanations.
And I thought the twilight zone was just a TV series and a movie…. To be living in that zone truly feels peculiar.
What is it, pod people or something?
I have no idea. But something about this tragedy is very messed (aside from the tragedy itself). It feels like it could be pod people. There are so many things that just don’t seem right.
How about the several websites that posted memorial funds 2-4 days prior to the shooting? Doesn’t that seem a bit odd? I could see that it could have been a posting date/time error by the respective site, but we are talking about several incidences of this on completely different systems, including GOOGLE time stamping. Doesn’t it seem odd that someone would post a memorial fund for an event that has not yet happened?
How about FEMA performing classes and exercises on how to deal with a tragedy, exactly like this one, not more than a 10min drive away from Sandy Hook?
I am not a conspiracy theorist, in fact, I don’t like conspiracy theories and find it difficult to believe in any of them, but man, there are so many very strange things surrounding this event, as Steve illustrates with this particular video. If this video isn’t messed up, I don’t know what is. Seriously, would you act anything like this guy if your daughter was brutally murdered in her 1st grade class just a few hours prior?
seriously?
Oh, expanding on the FEMA thing, not only was it a class and exercises to deal with exactly this sort of scenario, but according the the FEMA website calendar, it was scheduled for exactly the same date and time that the Sandy Hook tragedy took place. Coincidence? Perhaps,.. but it just adds more to the fire that is strange shit surrounding this incident.
@squid2112
You will find cache dates before the actual date if the page was indexed by Google for the first with some other content on it and it can be before the 14th. This is true and it can be easily explained.
The https://newtown.uwwesternct.org/ is a bit scary as the domain name uwwesternct.org is old but the newtown.uwwesternct.org url was indexed by Google on the 11th of Dec.for the first time. Coincident?
However, what was on this url newtown.uwwesternct.org prior to the 14th of Dec. that was in relation to “newtown” and what has triggered Google to index on the 11th for the first time?
The url http://www.uwwesternct.org/volunteer-consultant-program was indexed by Google on the 10th for the first time and the link “CLICK for Newtown/Sandy Hook Volunteer Information” could be added later, but it will not change the original indexed date.
However, I believe that links to unknown urls will be indexed by Google with the next run. That could indicate that the page that existed on the 10th could trigger the indexing on the 11th.
I’m using an addon for the page age in Firefox that displays the first indexed date from Google even if the search result omits it.
I’m puzzled with this one as I can’t disproof it. Anyone?
The problem is Juergen, I have seen the cached pages contents. The actual contents from both Google and Bing, and they both contained information about Sandy Hook shooting. The cached (not live) content. That is, the material that was actually cached at the time. There is evidence of this from Google and Bing cache’s, along with a 3rd party archiving service. I don’t know how to explain those things.
I am a 25 year veteran of software development with more than 12 years of web application software development and one of the leading SEO researchers in the country. I have a pretty good understanding of how Google and Bing work and how their caching is done. I also am familiar with, and have used, 3rd party archiving services.
Thanks though.
@squid2112
If you see this. Google has changed the indexed date of the page.
The Firefox add-on and the search result show now the 14th of December.
Is this now a confirmation that the original indexed date was actually correct?
Someone had to manually change this date! Amazing.
Now they try to make us believe that they set this up on the 14th. Consider that this is actually using an Amazon Cloud service! Quick! Very quick!
You probably don’t want to watch this video before trying to go to sleep for the night. Again, I don’t like conspiracy theories, But I gotta say, if you can honestly watch through all of this, visit the related sites containing the referenced material. I suspect you won’t get a wink. You will be like I was the other night, thinking and thinking all night long ..”what do I believe” .. odd shit .. odd shit.
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/01/sandy-hook-hoax-blown-to-pieces-the-actors-puppets-motives-gun-control-agenda-scam-2538598.html
And a more concise version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gqqjBRfZu2w
Actual emergency scanner radio of the incident (very odd): http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Cxa24q81rFE
As I had mentioned prior, can someone explain how so many systems could have possibly incorrectly recorded the proper date for all of these sites that were created for the Sandy Hook victims prior to the incident? Including BOTH Google and Bing?
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2013/01/08/sandy-hook-ripdonation-webpages-created-before-the-massacre/
That video of Parker is very damning. Some have tried to debunk it by saying it was “nervous” laughter. Seriously? The guy very obviously forces himself from being jovial into a state of being “distraught”.
He is relaxed, happy and cocky.
If you really want to see all of this and more, you should go to sandyhookhoax.com Very disturbing. I think out communist government is…..
WTF That’s weird, disturbing to watch after seeing this guy (un)compose himself.
Yeah. I thought that was pretty bizarre when I saw that. I go “WTF???” when I caught that.
I wonder how good a medical examiner this guy is, because he is absolutely hopeless at PR:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SfJi4ZtKso
Not to mention he says a rifle was used, yet a later report says there were only handguns. No wonder many people have little faith in what was reported; there’s a huge smell coming from it all.
That guy just creeps me out. What a psychopath…
I can’t explain the time stamp thing, but I have a theory on this guy, the janitor, the “nurse” and the other parents seen on the “conspiracy video”.
Your news media might be even more messed up than I thought. If they have an interesting news event and they can’t get anyone interesting to give an interview (who would want to give an interview after some crazy loner has just randomly killed your daughter?) they just hire an actor to make stuff up. Who knows if this guys daughter did even exist?
It might be that it is done by individual reporters who are pressured to make the interview or get fired, or it might be the network itself, but it is pretty clear something like that is happening.
This would explain why there was so much conflicting information about the case. Everybody is just making stuff up to get the most viewers and nobody can really tell which parts are the truth.
I think you’ve probably diagnosed the situation correctly. Still, this is a significant demonstration of the MSM’s laziness and corruption. It suggests that newstainment may have become the norm. It may also have to do with the nature of TV as a news medium.
WOW, I didn’t know there is a huge storm around this Sandy Hook shooting. Strange whatever is going on here!
Of course our USA government would NEVER use newscasts or journalists to lie about current events or to attempt to influence public perception! Never! Well, maybe not “never.” I mean, they have admitted to doing so in the past. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Mockingbird But that was a long time ago, and they promised — not just casually said so, but PROMISED! — that they would not continue to do so. I mean, the head of the CIA said so! Way back in 1976, he said so! Gosh! Is anyone so cynical that they would not trust the CIA to tell them the truth?!
http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2013/s3667764.htm
This is a real tragedy and real grief. Happened only a few weeks ago.
“Singular horrible events like [the Sandy Hook shooting] make us all upset, but if we look at the data, it doesn’t make sense that that’s where we need to beef up security in a very expensive way — not only financially but also at the cost of our children’s feeling of security,” Kenneth Dodge, director of the Center for Child and Family Policy at Duke University told The Huffington Post last month. “Isn’t it more straightforward to just get rid of the guns?”
Librul logications.
the easy way to try and discredit a whistleblower or someone tlling the truth or querying a scam or lie os to immediately cry Conspiracy theorist:..
because the words are preprogrammed to make the average joe go ooooh I dont wanna look think, go there,
it works a treat, on some.
however like 911 having a training excersize runnin at the same day n time,
ditto 711 in uk and now sandyhook too?
the better and more Factual term is False Flag.
your govt already had the antigun agenda lined up in the wings and needed something to tip the sheeple to agree,
just like bush wanted war and the public refused, until? 911 scared em witless.
suuure the guy on the planes passport landed in the treet from ???stories up in an inferno:-)
the building is pulp but they can miraculously find the banksters hard drives to save their asses?
while lanzas pc cant be recovered drive wise? and all he used was a hammer?
Australia copped the same decades ago woth Port Phillip shootings, just like aurora
time place and shooters stunning accuracy there?(ok colo wasnt a good shot)
this from a not so bright reclusive rich kid with NO priors..
immediately we had usa antigun campigners here and a restrictive system inposed against all protest and beyond reason, considerin the amount of guns and low level incidents before.
now we have a pretty well disarmed populace with crazy tough laws on owners while the crims run free with whatever they can get blackmarket, and thats a lot.
Steve, I think your post is seriously misjudged, and I hope you will consider removing it.
There isn’t a single, correct way in which people handle grief, and I find it disturbing that you and several commenters seem to think you know what was going on in Parker’s mind. I don’t know whether it is unusual for someone, forced by circumstances to confront their feelings, to switch suddenly from an apparently light-hearted state of mind to one of obvious distress but I know from personal experience of it that it happens.
Regardless of the miniscule validity of your point, he is acting for the camera. He forced his mood to change when the camera started rolling. I’m interested in finding the truth, not covering up.
Anonymous, I don’t know how I would react in a situation like this. I can’t even imagine, and my deepest sympathies go out to the parents and families of the victims in this tragedy. However, I am most certain that I would in no way be acting anything like this guy. Not even close. I have seen hundreds of videos of people reacting to similar tragedies (911 just one of them), and I have never in my life, ever seen someone act like this. This is simply remarkable.
And the fact of the matter is, I don’t believe anyone here is necessarily judging this guy, but most (if not all) of us are questioning the actions to better understand why someone would act like this. I strongly believe that everyone’s “skepticism” of this matter on this site is completely justified. Just watch the fricken video!
Further, I have watched just about every news broadcast and interview surrounding this event. I have yet to actually see a single solitary tear from anyone. Sure, I see sobs and all sorts of contortions, but I saw absolutely not actual tears from anyone. This seems very odd to me, as I have seen many other interviews of parents in the aftermath of tragedies, and in every case that I can recount, the tears were genuine and flowing. Not in this case, not a single one. To this I am wondering as well. There is just something simply not right about this thing. Again, for anyone that has been impacted by this tragedy, my deepest and warmest condolences go out to you, but if you have been impacted by this yourself, then shouldn’t you also be wondering what the hell is going on here?
Steve, good to see you are questioning the many strange anomalies and contradictions in the official Sandy Hook story and media coverage. The parallels with the many unanswered questions about the official story of 9/11 and how the media effectively set the agenda: the interview with the guy wearing the Harley Davidson T-shirt who not only saw both towers collapse but knew the reason why (“structural failure due to the intense heat of the fires”) who also turned out to be an actor); the fact that FEMA arrived in Manhattan the night before; the hijacker’s passport which survived the jet’s impact and blast, and was found on the street a 1000 feet below unblemished within minutes of the media arriving; the BBC reporter announcing the collapse of WTC7 25 minutes before it actually fell etc.). IMHO the western media is as heavily influenced (and sometimes controlled) as their counterparts were the former Soviet Union. The world is not as it seems, and we are just pawns.
@lapgous: “the BBC reporter announcing the collapse of WTC7 25 minutes before it actually fell …”
Here’s why:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg&index=11
P.S. All the other 9/11 conspiracies debunked on the same channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/RKOwens4?feature=watch
Whoops … wrong link for the BBC and WTC#7; here is the correct one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8&list=UUdNkRyt3S0oTQQdzlKJtXyg&index=11
Seems to be a problem with the youtube channel – just click on the link for the user RKOwens4.
LLAP – I was wrong, the BBC did not report the collapse of WTC7 25 minutes before it actually fell – it was only 23 minutes. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NefExHDu3s – Building 7 is clearly visible behind her left shoulder until the video link conveniently breaks up. The premature collapse was not only reported by BBC News 24 but also by BBC radio station in the UK and also by CNN.
This is the video I meant to post:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZrlNw-31R8
That guy must be a sociopath – he clearly enjoyed being in the spotlight and obviously revelled in his talent and ability to fool everyone watching – good performance if he hadn’t been so cocksure of his talent.
I wouldn’t want to meet a guy like that in a dark alley if he needed some money urgently.
Thank you, Steve, for being alert to these events and for posting them here.
The lives of Sir Fred Hoyle and George Orwell in 1946 suggest that government deception and science merged in the aftermath of WWII: http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2199