WASHINGTON, Jan. 23, 2013 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — A group of 20 ex-NASA scientists have concluded that the science used to support the man-made climate change hypothesis is not settled and no convincing physical evidence exists to support catastrophic climate change forecasts.
h/t to Marc Morano
What a pity they are all “ex-Nasa” scientists!
AGW’s (Anthropogenic Global Warming) invalid scientific foundation . . .
Is based on a misrepresentation of Earth’s heat source – the Sun – as a hydrogen fusion reactor after Hiroshima was vaporized and the UN was established in 1945.
In fact, the Sun is the remains of the supernova that birthed the Solar System five billion years (5 Gyr) ago, as P. K. Kuroda suspected in 1945 [1].
Standing in the ashes of Hiroshima in August 1945, the nuclear scientist that would later become my research mentor in 1960 [1] said:
“The sight before my eyes was just like the end of the world, but I also felt that the beginning of the world may have been just like this.” [1] – page 2
1. Professor P. K. Kuroda recognized the power of the Creator, Sustainer and Destroyer of lives and worlds in the ruins of Hiroshima in Aug 1945 [1].
2. Government science became a tool of government propaganda after the UN was formed on 24 Oct 1945, beginning in 1946 with two papers by . . .
3. Sir Fred Hoyle, a British science fiction author misrepresented the internal composition of stars and their source of energy in 1946 [2], exactly as . . .
4. Another British author of science fiction, George Orwell, warned as he was was dying from tuberculosis when he left London in 1946 and moved <i.“to the sodden, remote, windswept Scottish island of Jura” [3], was admitted to Hairmyres Hospital on Christmas Eve 1946 [4], where the hospital staff “confiscated his typewriter” he was using to warn society about a tyrannical government that would appear by “Nineteen-Eighty Four” [5].
http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/
George Orwell knew this crime against science and society was underway in 1946:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2013/01/10/crime-against-science/
Today world leaders and loyal AGW promoters are still trying to hide or ignore unambiguous evidence of the Sun’s variable pulsar core [6,7]:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2013/08jan_sunclimate/
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=nl&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nu.nl%2Fwetenschap%2F3009729%2Fgammaflits-raakte-aarde.html
http://climaterealists.com/index.php?id=11000&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medi um=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:%20ClimaterealistsNewsBlog%20(ClimateRealists%20Ne ws%20Blog)
With deep regrets,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
References:
[1] P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo
Phenomenon (Springer Publishing, 165 pages, Dec 1982): page 2.
http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3540116796
[2] Fred Hoyle, “The chemical composition of the stars,” Monthly Notices Royal Astronomical Society 106, 255-259 (1946); “The synthesis of elements from hydrogen,” ibid., 343-383 (1946)
[3] John J. Ross, “Tuberculosis, bronchiectasis, and infertility: What Ailed George Orwell?” Clinical Infectious Diseases 41, 1599-1603 (2005): http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/11/1599.f…
[4] Hairmyres Hospital, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hairmyres_Hospital
[5] George Owrell (Eric Arthur Blair), “Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)” Secker and Warburg, 1949: http://www.amazon.com/Nineteen-Eighty-Four-Centennial-Edition-George/dp/0452284236
[6] Peter Toth, “Is the Sun a pulsar?” Nature 270, 159-160 (1977):
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v270/n5633/abs/270159a0.html
[7] “Yes, the Sun is a pulsar,” Nature (submitted 12 Dec 2012):
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/10640850/Yes_the_Sun_is_a_pulsar.pdf
Hopefully there will be a whole new crew of ex-NASA scientists soon. Cuffs would be a nice touch.
I don’t think cuffs would be appropriate for any of those involved. Belatedly, I agree with the old advice, “Judge not that you be not judged”
If we ‘follow the money’, co2-producing-energy peddlers stand to earn if we continue burning ‘dirty’ fuels while the so-called green-energy-producing peddlers stand to earn if we adopt national energy policies that accept global warming scenarios and switch to the green industries.
At least one of these ex-NASA figures is also a “retired energy industry executive” (H. Leighton Steward) http://www.therightclimatestuff.com/StudiesReports.html
PR Newswire (the publisher of this story) isn’t an investigative news reporting body but rather a PR/news releasing company. These factors leave me skeptical of these 20 skeptics.
I’m not saying they’re wrong, but I am saying that they might have bia$ed motives.
I have been highly critical of NASA for years.
They might have bia$ed motives, but their actions in “jumping ship” may mean that after Obama’s election they realized scientific deception would lead to world-wide enslavement of the next generation.
Nobody, absolutely nobody, wants their children and grandchildren to be forced to live under a tyrannical, one-world, Orwellian government.
Whether by enlightened awakening to scientific facts, or enlightened awakening to the fact that the AGW bandwagon is going over the cliff, we should be grateful for their conversion to reality.
See: http://omanuel.wordpress.com/about/#comment-2199