Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- 100% Wind By 2030
- It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- Climate Grifting Shutting Down
- Fundamental Pillars Of Democracy
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
Recent Comments
- DABA13 on 100% Wind By 2030
- Gamecock on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on 100% Wind By 2030
- gordon vigurs on 100% Wind By 2030
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- arn on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
- dm on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on 100% Wind By 2030
- conrad ziefle on It Is A Nice Idea, But ….
1995 IPCC Report Showed That Hurricanes Are Getting Weaker
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Also less frequent, like no major hurricane US landfalls going on 9 years!
NOAA admits the weak Hurricane Season… 6th weakest since 1950…
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2013/20131125_endofhurricaneseason.html
Nov 18: Breaking: Astonishing new element in climate fraud uncovered?
“Has a critical new element in the climate fraud been uncovered? Independent British researcher, Derek Alker, attending the UK lecture tour of Australian climatologist, Dr Murry Salby, stumbles on an apparent critical flaw in climate models. Alker finds the models are dependent only on carbon dioxide (CO2) to change temperature. Incredibly, the models seem to be pre-programmed so that no other atmospheric variable is allowed to alter climate. Read Alker’s full analysis below:”
http://www.principia-scientific.org/latest-news/398-breaking-astonishing-new-element-in-climate-fraud-uncovered.html
Not likely. Look up “climate attribution”, which details, according to the climate models, what portion of the claimed temperature rise is due to measured variations in “greenhouse gases”. solar, volcanic emissions, ozone, aerosol sulfates, etc.. It’s all baloney, in the final analysis, but they couldn’t do that if the models didn’t take account–however incorrectly–of the effect of each of those variables. I have an image downloaded from the internet (I didn’t preserve the link–I downloaded it back in December 2009) showing time series for each of those variables, indicating how they “add up” to the “measured” global temperature record (over the time period 1900 to 1990, in this image).