Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Richard E Fritz on HUD Climate Advisor
- Richard E Fritz on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Robertvd on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Bob G on Ellen Flees To The UK
Also less frequent, like no major hurricane US landfalls going on 9 years!
NOAA admits the weak Hurricane Season… 6th weakest since 1950…
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2013/20131125_endofhurricaneseason.html
Nov 18: Breaking: Astonishing new element in climate fraud uncovered?
“Has a critical new element in the climate fraud been uncovered? Independent British researcher, Derek Alker, attending the UK lecture tour of Australian climatologist, Dr Murry Salby, stumbles on an apparent critical flaw in climate models. Alker finds the models are dependent only on carbon dioxide (CO2) to change temperature. Incredibly, the models seem to be pre-programmed so that no other atmospheric variable is allowed to alter climate. Read Alker’s full analysis below:”
http://www.principia-scientific.org/latest-news/398-breaking-astonishing-new-element-in-climate-fraud-uncovered.html
Not likely. Look up “climate attribution”, which details, according to the climate models, what portion of the claimed temperature rise is due to measured variations in “greenhouse gases”. solar, volcanic emissions, ozone, aerosol sulfates, etc.. It’s all baloney, in the final analysis, but they couldn’t do that if the models didn’t take account–however incorrectly–of the effect of each of those variables. I have an image downloaded from the internet (I didn’t preserve the link–I downloaded it back in December 2009) showing time series for each of those variables, indicating how they “add up” to the “measured” global temperature record (over the time period 1900 to 1990, in this image).