Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Mike Peinsipp on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Robertvd on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Also less frequent, like no major hurricane US landfalls going on 9 years!
NOAA admits the weak Hurricane Season… 6th weakest since 1950…
http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2013/20131125_endofhurricaneseason.html
Nov 18: Breaking: Astonishing new element in climate fraud uncovered?
“Has a critical new element in the climate fraud been uncovered? Independent British researcher, Derek Alker, attending the UK lecture tour of Australian climatologist, Dr Murry Salby, stumbles on an apparent critical flaw in climate models. Alker finds the models are dependent only on carbon dioxide (CO2) to change temperature. Incredibly, the models seem to be pre-programmed so that no other atmospheric variable is allowed to alter climate. Read Alker’s full analysis below:”
http://www.principia-scientific.org/latest-news/398-breaking-astonishing-new-element-in-climate-fraud-uncovered.html
Not likely. Look up “climate attribution”, which details, according to the climate models, what portion of the claimed temperature rise is due to measured variations in “greenhouse gases”. solar, volcanic emissions, ozone, aerosol sulfates, etc.. It’s all baloney, in the final analysis, but they couldn’t do that if the models didn’t take account–however incorrectly–of the effect of each of those variables. I have an image downloaded from the internet (I didn’t preserve the link–I downloaded it back in December 2009) showing time series for each of those variables, indicating how they “add up” to the “measured” global temperature record (over the time period 1900 to 1990, in this image).