But it is worse than it seems. All of the ice growth has been on the Pacific side, where it will survive the winter and thicken. Can you imagine the sad faces at NSIDC?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Mac on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Francis Barnett on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on Perfect Correlation
- Gordon Vigurs on Perfect Correlation
- Gw on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Disillusioned on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
The multi-year ice on the Pacific side will take a long time to be expelled through the Fram Strait.
Safely tucked away, with nowhere to go.
Why don’t you show how much ice growth there has been since 2000.
Why don’t you tell us how much warmer it was in July?
So the 36% growth doesn’t matter, gotya.
Why don’t you check the post before this one. That will take you back to 2005 from a neutral data source. Then do a little of your own research, maybe even from past posts here. Most of us here know what the combined data looks like. We are also watching that 2013 line crawl slowly away from past years.