But it is worse than it seems. All of the ice growth has been on the Pacific side, where it will survive the winter and thicken. Can you imagine the sad faces at NSIDC?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
- “4th Hottest Summer”
- Killing Joshua Trees To Save Them
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Disillusioned on Mann Says He Was Correct
- Peter Carroll on Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- Peter Carroll on AI Climate Math
- dm on AI Climate Math
- dm on AI Climate Math
- Bob G on AI Climate Math
- Russell Cook on AI Climate Math
- conrad ziefle on AI Climate Math
- Billyjack on Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
The multi-year ice on the Pacific side will take a long time to be expelled through the Fram Strait.
Safely tucked away, with nowhere to go.
Why don’t you show how much ice growth there has been since 2000.
Why don’t you tell us how much warmer it was in July?
So the 36% growth doesn’t matter, gotya.
Why don’t you check the post before this one. That will take you back to 2005 from a neutral data source. Then do a little of your own research, maybe even from past posts here. Most of us here know what the combined data looks like. We are also watching that 2013 line crawl slowly away from past years.