Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
- Imaginary Cold And Snow
- Six Years Of No Conversation
- THE YEAR OF NO WINTER
- Climate Misinformation From AI (Part II)
- Grok’s “Anecdotal” Data
- Earth Granted 26 Year Reprieve
- Ancient Astronauts
- Hillary To Win By Double Digits
- Global Communism To Save The Maldives
- Another Top New York Judge
- The Saudi Arabia Of Wind
Recent Comments
- arn on Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- arn on Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- gordon vigurs on Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Bob G on “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Bob G on Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Bob G on Is New York About To Drown?
- Disillusioned on “He Who Must Not Be Named”
- Bob G on Disappearing New York
- Ulric Lyons on “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Tel on “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Global Warming Survey
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
I see Dana AND Cook BOTH visited today.
I’m starting to think that item 1 might be the correct answer, because I know about humans in New York, California, Virginia, Pennsylvania, and lots of other places that change the climate seemingly for publicity alone.
EUREKA!!! Maybe a study that asks about the NUMBER of humans that cause climate change? If people see that it is just a few, and we can stop THEM, maybe there wouldn’t be so much money changing hands.
If humans weren’t around none would notice, so I voted 100%
Can’t you include some variety in choices? Something about Aliens would be nice.
Where is the 110% choice?
It’s 97% AND 99%. The former when the catastrophe is proceeding according to the current 5-year-plan, the latter if The Party uncovers saboteurs and deniers in the pay of Big X.
The 100% option is forbidden; it is the dictatorial equivalent to the capitalist $99.99 price tag that looks so much nicer than one that says “$100.00”.
I just voted honestly and I expect that all respondents here should have voted the same.
I don’t remember the climate changing during high school, when all I could think about was sex 96.94% (222 votes)
Ahhh, the real 97% shows up. 🙂