What a pathetic excuse for a newspaper. They forbid any factual material.
Just 90 companies caused two-thirds of man-made global warming emissions
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- GW on A Giant Eyesore
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
Ever since Drillbit Dana arrived I have been on pre mod, making it virtually impossible to discuss anything. He seems to have brought his SS moderating over with him.
OP; They seem to be where every other news source is, and that place is the internet where even firsthand quotes turn into bad wikipedia reference garbage. Galvanize; break free of your shackles and throw the flaming rot of your mind until something intelligent sticks and hard mods become weak-kneed rugby drop-outs.
Same thing happens to me when I try to express my support for the IPCC. Even the IPCC are considered insufficiently warmist these days for the Guardian.
Unreality is insufficiently unreal.
So regular commenters have their comments moderated prior to approval, and heretics are pre-moderated? I wonder what the next category higher than that is.
There are at least two higher categories possible…excommunication, and inquisition.
“??????? ??????” – ????? ????? ?????????? ???????????????? ????????
You have to go for retraining/eduction before the collective will let you comment, comrade.
What was Steve’s comment that was removed?
And yes, it is telling when “science” via “journalism” cannot tolerate debate. I was always taught that was the essence of both.
Welcome to The Club, Steve.
I was right out banned – 10 times now. 😉
The Guardian is an Echo Chamber of like minded head-nodders.
No dissension in the ranks is permitted. Obey!
Yes, those 90 companies that dare provide fuel for people’s cars, houses, and to run power plants. And the cement manufacturers, they are also horrible. We need to ban oil, coal, and cement now. No one uses any of those things.
I buy a gallon of oil & put it in my car’s crankcase. Obviously there are virtually no emissions produced directly from this oil (though the production of it may entail some). Then, I change the oil & give the (slightly gasoline diluted) stuff to the guy I know who has an oil-burning furnace (& wants to save a few bucks this Winter). Now, at that point does he get charged with the emissions, do I, or does the oil company?
You blocked me, and censored my posts.
That should be obvious to everyone here reading your post
I’m talking about when you blocked me last time. I asked you a simple question, and then instant ban hammer. I don’t have any sympathy with the newspaper blocking you, when you do exactly the same thing.
Bullshit.
No Steve, that would be ATowerOfToeCheese
You got blocked after airing your banal anti-science views many times. Thankfully for you Steven seems to be a patient guy who lets your joke comments go by.
I not sure that I would have done the same if I was in his position.
I got blocked for asking Steven about the amount of multiyear ice in 2000. Call it anti-science if you like; he blocked me because he didn’t like what I was saying and because I refused to take his distracting bait.
I publish that all the time, but it had nothing to do with a discussion of ice growth since 2009.
Are you a complete moron?
Call it bullshit if you like. The way I see it; you can dish it but can’t take it. Everything on your blog, you own – no dissenting opinion allowed. The guardian is simply following your example.
My comments are regularly removed by the Guardian, but then Steven Goddard threatened me with the same thing when I commented on his Tacloban opinions. Pot, Kettle…you know the rest.
Yes, everyone can see that your comments are blocked.
Are you saying you didn’t threaten to censor me?
I am going to censor you if you continue wasting my time with stupid shit.
Hey Joe a link to the place where you got censored would be nice, otherwise GFY
Hey Debee…troll
Cry baby, cry.
I would love to see your comment that upset their poor little green sensibilities
Lol, and apparently I’m not the only one. Dissenting opinions on guardian = EVIL CENSORSHIP. Dissenting opinion on ‘real science’ = spam removal.
You are a hypocrite, Steven. Perhaps that’s why the guardian blocked you.
Hopefully you aren’t as stupid and anal in real life as you pretend to be.
As I asked Joe, links are good so one can judge your assertion regarding Steve. From what I see here, Steve would be right in labeling you a Moron
Oh and cheeseWiz GFY