How do you debate people with fully addled brains?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
Recent Comments
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- Charles Higley on 70C At Lisbon
- dm on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- Bob G on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Bob G on 70C At Lisbon
- John Francis on “Climate dread is everywhere”
- John Francis on Perfect Correlation
- oeman50 on 70C At Lisbon
- Gordon Vigurs on Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Good gravy.
“How do you debate people with fully addled brains?”
By inhaling a similar quantity of medication.
“The point”
\
/
\
/
\
[williamch’s head]
“To be charitable, maybe stevengoddard is pointing out that people have been saying that the sky is falling for a long time. I learned about it in secondary school, it was called science fiction”
Another science settler found his Goldilocks Zone.
More than a century ago it was demonstrated that the mythical “greenhouse effect” does not work on greenhouses. There has never been any evidence that it works on planets either. Teaching silly nonsense to school students is another reason that children would be better off and have learned more if th schools were just burned down.
He is not addled. Deluded, but not addled. He is a Leftist with a hate on for critics of the “consensus”, because that is his gang and their dogma, and he only “debates” to spout derogatory comments about the “foe” (that’s you, in this case, Steven). The only way you can win a “debate” with him is if the “debate” is set up as a very hard contact sport (with maybe an octagon around it…you know), where he doesn’t get to judge when or if you score a definitive hit on him, but must suffer the hit as a hard fact, immediately and intimately. Debating on the internet is like using a waterwheel to power your bicycle–in a word, ineffective (in two words: obviously ineffective).