How do you debate people with fully addled brains?
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Elon Pushing Pushing Geoengineering
- Earth, Wind And Fire
- On The Road Again
- Vandalism At The Reflecting Pool
- Fifty Years Ago Today
- Truth Or Consequences
- US Climate Trend Maps
- Declining Spring Snow Cover In Northern New Mexico
- You Can’t Fool Mother Nature
- Cattle And The Climate
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
Recent Comments
- Robertvd on Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- conrad ziefle on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Terry Shipman on Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- D. Boss on Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Gordon Vigurs on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Gordon Vigurs on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Bob G on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- John Francis on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
- Mike Peinsipp on Arctic Report card Summer 2026
- Mike Peinsipp on Three Years Since The Apocalypse
Good gravy.
“How do you debate people with fully addled brains?”
By inhaling a similar quantity of medication.
“The point”
\
/
\
/
\
[williamch’s head]
“To be charitable, maybe stevengoddard is pointing out that people have been saying that the sky is falling for a long time. I learned about it in secondary school, it was called science fiction”
Another science settler found his Goldilocks Zone.
More than a century ago it was demonstrated that the mythical “greenhouse effect” does not work on greenhouses. There has never been any evidence that it works on planets either. Teaching silly nonsense to school students is another reason that children would be better off and have learned more if th schools were just burned down.
He is not addled. Deluded, but not addled. He is a Leftist with a hate on for critics of the “consensus”, because that is his gang and their dogma, and he only “debates” to spout derogatory comments about the “foe” (that’s you, in this case, Steven). The only way you can win a “debate” with him is if the “debate” is set up as a very hard contact sport (with maybe an octagon around it…you know), where he doesn’t get to judge when or if you score a definitive hit on him, but must suffer the hit as a hard fact, immediately and intimately. Debating on the internet is like using a waterwheel to power your bicycle–in a word, ineffective (in two words: obviously ineffective).