Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Bob G on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Allan Shelton on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Bob G on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Gordon Vigurs on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Fred Harwood on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- arn on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- Luigi on “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Bob G on Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
Apparently Nuttercelli’s community has no standards to abide by if their science can’t stand criticism…
Sounds like the “standards” exist of unquestioning concurrence
I was banned from SkepticalScience because I complained that they twisted my comments by selective editing and actually adding their own text.
They block my IP address – something which is easy to circumvent but not worth the trouble.
As Steve says this type of action proves indisputably that even they have no confidence in their “science” – they do not even have the belief, faith or courage to enter into open honest debate.
They are all fraudulent cowards !
The Guardian reckons this below is acceptable comment from the alarmists.
Unbelievable that they allow this and not legitimate questions about their story.
Danabanana should stick a banana where the sun don’t shine. It will demonstrate a higher level of IQ than his comment. I publically dare the pinhead and his mates to come on this site and have a crack at demonstrating his IQ. Guardian editors are pussies.
From Guardian:
Danabanana Albert Ravey
13 November 2013 3:15pm
Recommend
22
I’d like to know, out of curiosity, how many sceptics have changed their minds in the last couple of years. In any case, those people you refer to -deniers, not sceptics- should be in line for castration. Not sure humanity needs that gene pool in the future.
Report