Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- arn on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Scott Allen on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Apparently Nuttercelli’s community has no standards to abide by if their science can’t stand criticism…
Sounds like the “standards” exist of unquestioning concurrence
I was banned from SkepticalScience because I complained that they twisted my comments by selective editing and actually adding their own text.
They block my IP address – something which is easy to circumvent but not worth the trouble.
As Steve says this type of action proves indisputably that even they have no confidence in their “science” – they do not even have the belief, faith or courage to enter into open honest debate.
They are all fraudulent cowards !
The Guardian reckons this below is acceptable comment from the alarmists.
Unbelievable that they allow this and not legitimate questions about their story.
Danabanana should stick a banana where the sun don’t shine. It will demonstrate a higher level of IQ than his comment. I publically dare the pinhead and his mates to come on this site and have a crack at demonstrating his IQ. Guardian editors are pussies.
From Guardian:
Danabanana Albert Ravey
13 November 2013 3:15pm
Recommend
22
I’d like to know, out of curiosity, how many sceptics have changed their minds in the last couple of years. In any case, those people you refer to -deniers, not sceptics- should be in line for castration. Not sure humanity needs that gene pool in the future.
Report