Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- An Inconvenient Truth
- Antarctic Meltdown Update
- “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Data Made Simple II – Sneak Preview
- Attacks On Democracy
- Scientists Warn
- Upping The Ante
- Our New Leadership
- Grok Defines Fake News
- Arctic Meltdown Update
- The Savior Of Humanity
- President Trump Explains The Stock Market
- Net Zero In Europe
- The Canadian Hockey Stick
- Dogs Cause Hurricanes, Tornadoes And Droughts
- 50 Years Of Climate Devastation
- Climate Cycles
- Hiding The Decline
- Careful Research At BBC News
- New Video : Man Made Climate Emergency
- Geoengineering To Save The Planet
- Geoengineering Genocide
- No Crime On Capitol Hill
- Chief Scientist And Religious Leader
- Heroes Saving The Climate
Recent Comments
- Scott Allen on Antarctic Meltdown Update
- Jehzsa on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- conrad ziefle on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- conrad ziefle on Antarctic Meltdown Update
- Mike Peinsipp on “Trump eyes major cuts to NOAA research”
- Mac on Attacks On Democracy
- Mac on Attacks On Democracy
- David M Kitting on Attacks On Democracy
- Jehzsa on Attacks On Democracy
- Jehzsa on Our New Leadership
Apparently Nuttercelli’s community has no standards to abide by if their science can’t stand criticism…
Sounds like the “standards” exist of unquestioning concurrence
I was banned from SkepticalScience because I complained that they twisted my comments by selective editing and actually adding their own text.
They block my IP address – something which is easy to circumvent but not worth the trouble.
As Steve says this type of action proves indisputably that even they have no confidence in their “science” – they do not even have the belief, faith or courage to enter into open honest debate.
They are all fraudulent cowards !
The Guardian reckons this below is acceptable comment from the alarmists.
Unbelievable that they allow this and not legitimate questions about their story.
Danabanana should stick a banana where the sun don’t shine. It will demonstrate a higher level of IQ than his comment. I publically dare the pinhead and his mates to come on this site and have a crack at demonstrating his IQ. Guardian editors are pussies.
From Guardian:
Danabanana Albert Ravey
13 November 2013 3:15pm
Recommend
22
I’d like to know, out of curiosity, how many sceptics have changed their minds in the last couple of years. In any case, those people you refer to -deniers, not sceptics- should be in line for castration. Not sure humanity needs that gene pool in the future.
Report