Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
Recent Comments
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Gamecock on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- William on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Francis Barnett on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- BenV on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- arn on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Greg in NZ on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- czechlist on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Disillusioned on Michael Mann Hurricane Update
Apparently Nuttercelli’s community has no standards to abide by if their science can’t stand criticism…
Sounds like the “standards” exist of unquestioning concurrence
I was banned from SkepticalScience because I complained that they twisted my comments by selective editing and actually adding their own text.
They block my IP address – something which is easy to circumvent but not worth the trouble.
As Steve says this type of action proves indisputably that even they have no confidence in their “science” – they do not even have the belief, faith or courage to enter into open honest debate.
They are all fraudulent cowards !
The Guardian reckons this below is acceptable comment from the alarmists.
Unbelievable that they allow this and not legitimate questions about their story.
Danabanana should stick a banana where the sun don’t shine. It will demonstrate a higher level of IQ than his comment. I publically dare the pinhead and his mates to come on this site and have a crack at demonstrating his IQ. Guardian editors are pussies.
From Guardian:
Danabanana Albert Ravey
13 November 2013 3:15pm
Recommend
22
I’d like to know, out of curiosity, how many sceptics have changed their minds in the last couple of years. In any case, those people you refer to -deniers, not sceptics- should be in line for castration. Not sure humanity needs that gene pool in the future.
Report