It turns out that 2012 temperatures were not the “new normal” after all.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on Climate Attribution Model
- Luigi on “Why Do You Resist?”
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Mike Peinsipp on “Why Do You Resist?”
The 3 top years and the 1 lowest are all outliers.
So a straight line from the 2001 point to the 2013 point is a more correct trend line.
Don’t worry, once homogenized, normalized, pasteurize, average, adjusted, suitably weighted, and changed the data, 2012 will be the official new normal.
Oh the hottest year ever, for sure. Maybe if some climate scientists froze to death, then we would make some headway.
So true 🙂