Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Robertvd on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gamecock on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- John Francis on “Why Do You Resist?”
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
I believe Mann’s choice of the Bristlecone pine was also a part of his original deception. As I recall, Craig Idso had earlier published research which showed that this species responded unusually to aerial CO2 fertilization making it a particularly bad proxy choice.
Dendrologists consider the Bristle Cone to be among the worst for this kind of proxy. But then there are so very many issues with that Schtick from the Mann-hole.
Climate Audit should be a gold mine for Steyn’s case. Mann’s statistical flim-flam of “short centring” as Steve McIntyre termed it was an egregious abuse of data and on that basis alone could Mann be accused of the “f” word. And if Steyn can use discovery to get at Mann’s correspondence while he was at U of V and Penn State, there may be other treasures to be found, My real concern is that Mann appears to be supported legally by deep pockets whereas Steyn appears to be on his own legally. One would think that big oil would pitch in to help Steyn if we can believe Mann’s paranoid nonsense.
Why would big oil want to kill the golden goose?
Big oil is into “green” energy up to their eyeballs.
Big Oil IS Big Green.
BP and Shell Oil and the Rockefeller Foundation (Standard oil money) founded CRU.
Shell VP, Ged Davis is in the climategate e-mails and was an IPCC lead author.
Mueller of BEST fame has a consulting business ‘Employing’ another Shell president….
If some researcher happens to hit the motherlode with a viable renewable energy source, Big Oil wants to be first in line to exploit it. Nothing “green” about it except the color of money.