We keep hearing breathless hysterical rants from journalists wondering what is wrong with climate deniers, why they don’t listen to the scientists
A simple way to find out would be to ask us, but they won’t do that because it would damage their agenda. Modern journalists are simply not permitted to do any actual journalism.
Only press releases nowadays. From pre-screened, agreeable agenda seekers.
Sad times for the republic.
Same crap down under in Oz. Breathless SMH (Guardian twin) announces that a poll of Australians say they are worried about Glo bull Worming, but the poll is not out till June 4. This is the new alarmist strategy to deflect critics. Announce results weeks in advance, without producing evidence, to get weeks of clear air before critics tear their evidence to pieces once it is published.
Propaganda 101 – straight from Joseph Goebbels play book.
http://m.smh.com.au/environment/australians-more-worried-about-climate-change-poll-finds-20140523-38u81.html
I have the Good Sense God gave me and look out my window and say thank you for the Wonderful Dynamic World I live on,so Which part of 4.5 billion years of Climate Change don’t you understand? <:o)
With Obama and the Insane Left, the agenda is always campaign lies, and BLATANT ones at that, nothing more. It is all about retaining power by hoaxing a public, a disheartening portion of which are all too willing to drink the Kool-Aid and pronounce it superb. To protect Obama’s lack of any character whatsoever, his followers, particularly in the media, have had to denude themselves of any character they may have had. Third world tyranny, anyone?
They should call Andy Revkin. He may have a list from the expert on Denialism, David Victor *). With that list in hand, a journalist could go to his boss and ask:
“I’d like to call one shill, one skeptic and one hobbyist each for climate denial. Is it ok?”
The boss would then look at her schedule and and say:
“Nah, we already ran a shill this month. Wait till June.”
That would be more orderly than the current journalistic anarchy.
———-
*) Aristotelian classification of Denialism by David Victor:
Strangely, there are also three classes of Alarmists: Those who are very good at math, & those who are even better at math.
… and when we add all the Alarmists who were promised there wouldn’t be any math there will be five classes.
It is all that Kock brother money that turned us away from science and turned us into oil industry shills. We wish!
“Things Go Better With Coke” (1960s) – Classic TV Commercial
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS45M-EhjLM
Thanks, Jim. I did not like the suggestion either. I’m old-fashioned that way.
“Modern journalists are simply not permitted to do any actual journalism.”
Much like modern climate scientists are simply not permitted to do any actual science.
From:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/11/new-isotope-based-temperature-reconstruction-using-mcintyres-starbucks-hypothesis-tree-core-samples/
– – – –
… in the summer of 2007, Steve … went to Colorado to visit his sister, and to prove or disprove his ‘Starbucks hypothesis’ which asks:
This came about because apparently RealClimateScientists™ don’t have the funds or time to get out of the office and gather new tree core samples, such as cores that would fill in the last 25 years that seems to be part of that “tricky” divergence problem. In A Little Secret (Oct 2007) Steve wrote:
More – http://climateaudit.org/2007/10/12/a-little-secret/
.
Modern journalist? I thought they called them useful idiots.
Yes, but modern.
NAH, They are Willing Accomplices or in many cases out right KGB agents like Hemmingway (Argo) was.
Hey Gator, here’s a modern satirist that does a much better job than modern journalists:
http://www.thedailyrash.com/al-gore-global-warming-will-cause-millions-of-peoples-heads-to-explode/
“why they don’t listen to the scientists”
Meaning some butt wiper who voted for Obama and who expects to get paid for supporting him. No thanks.