Last year, the LA Times announced that they weren’t going to publish skeptical comments any more, but now their comments are almost 100% skeptical.
Perhaps reality is setting in.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- stewartpid on COP29 Preview
- GeologyJim on A Giant Eyesore
- GeologyJim on COP29 Preview
More likely, a particular editor was canned?
Better caned, because I think it’s the print edition that accepts no letters from “deniers,” They must have thrown in the towel on trying to control the Wild Wild Web. Or they would have to do like Popular Science and cut off all comments altogether, just to silence climate skeptics.
Safe to say that no one reads the LA Times website. Not even the moderators.
interesting how many sceptics ARE finally getting comments in in the uardian news ltd etc here in Aus…after a very long time of refusals.
guardian mods inundated and gave in maybe?
I am waiting for the other shoe.