Last year, the LA Times announced that they weren’t going to publish skeptical comments any more, but now their comments are almost 100% skeptical.
Perhaps reality is setting in.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Climate Of 1923
- Market Volatility
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
- Useful Graphs From ChatGPT
- Fort Lauderdale Drowning
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Expert Arctic Forecasting
- Sinking Of The Titanic
- Nobel Prize Winning Forecast
- Changing Climate
- Gen Z Math And Solutions
- Orwellian NASA Maps
- Faking US Temperature Data
Recent Comments
- arn on Market Volatility
- arn on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Bill on Gemini Can See The Future
- conrad ziefle on Market Volatility
- conrad ziefle on Hottest Summer Ever
- stewartpid on Market Volatility
- William on Record CO2 Growth
- Greg in NZ on Hottest Summer Ever
More likely, a particular editor was canned?
Better caned, because I think it’s the print edition that accepts no letters from “deniers,” They must have thrown in the towel on trying to control the Wild Wild Web. Or they would have to do like Popular Science and cut off all comments altogether, just to silence climate skeptics.
Safe to say that no one reads the LA Times website. Not even the moderators.
interesting how many sceptics ARE finally getting comments in in the uardian news ltd etc here in Aus…after a very long time of refusals.
guardian mods inundated and gave in maybe?
I am waiting for the other shoe.