Until a few years ago, government experts said that Greenland and Antarctica were both cooling. But that didn’t suit the agenda.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
Recent Comments
- arn on Fact Checking NASA
- arn on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Hank Phillips on Fact Checking NASA
- Hank Phillips on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA
- Gordon Vigurs on Fact Checking NASA
- Bob G on Fact Checking NASA



It seems like the climate just comes and goes as it pleases! Pity isn’t it?
I don’t believe anything in “climate science” any more. That second abstract above just tells me “ozone depletion” is probably just as worthless an excuse for temperature change as I know “increase in greenhouse gases” is. All of the peer-reviewed literature is just a continuing exercise in … well, let’s just say it’s a reflexive exercise in massaging the current academic dogma, for the sake of quick gratification…
Reblogged this on the WeatherAction Blog.
Bipolar science
Jason Box has gone wildly warmist since 2004.
http://www.meltfactor.org/blog/