[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bhFB7-w2MY8]
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
Recent Comments
- Mike Peinsipp on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- dearieme on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Gordon Vigurs on The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Peter Carroll on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Disillusioned on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- Bob G on “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
Reblogged this on CLINGERS… BLOGGING BAD ~ DICK.G: AMERICAN !.
University of Melbourne confirms there is no science in Climate Research.
It’s all about public policy.
http://m.theaustralian.com.au/business/latest/henry-in-switch-to-university-climate-role/story-e6frg90f-1226905511227
The following organizations provide evidence that:
1) Global Warming / Climate Change is real.
2) Human activities are by far the largest causative agent.
3) Global Warming / Climate Change is a continuing, ongoing phenomenon.
American Meteorological Society
“It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2)”
http://www.ametsoc.org/policy/2012climatechange.html
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
“Report: Human activity fuels global warming”
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/climate.html
California Institute of Technology
“How We Know Global Warming is Real”
“The science behind human-induced climate change”
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~tapio/papers/skeptic_2008.pdf
Stanford University
“A large body of scientific information indicates that global climate change is unequivocal, almost certainly is caused mostly by human activities, is already causing significant harm, and as it continues, holds great risks for our future.”
https://pangea.stanford.edu/programs/outreach/climatechange/
Columbia University
“The Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming”
“With higher CO2 concentrations come expectations of a stronger greenhouse effect and therefore warmer global temperatures.”
http://www.columbia.edu/~vjd1/greenhouse.htm
You’re kidding right?
You know just say those things to get grant money surely?
Have human activities ‘fuelled’ the last 17+ years of no global warming?
“It’s already causing significant harm..” Really? Where? Or did the “harm” stop 17 years ago and we just missed it?
Bill,
argumentum ab auctoritate
Google it.
If the earth was a greenhouse there would be no life on this planet genius. Gaia emits 95 % of Co2, surely we must kill her to save her ? Moron alert……
I’ll go with #4 Bill – as follows:
4) Global Chese / Climate Cheese – good on crackers, on pizza, and my all time fave the philadelphia cheese steak
The only thing missing are the actual effects. Pity that.
Don’t you just love it. They always open with “neglecting the facts” then neglect to bring any.
I suspect he is already regretting that one. Right up there with the Hillary one.
MIT ISN’T as convinced about AGW as you are….. http://www.examiner.com/article/carbon-dioxide-irrelevant-climate-debate-says-mit-scientist