Climate experts like Barack Obama say that 2012 was the hottest year in US history, because they don’t know very much about US history. Many years were much hotter than 2012.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
- Climate Change, Income Inequality And Racism
- The New Kind Of Green
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Bob G on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Peter Carroll on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
Wow, the king has spoken. Must be true if he says so. What I just don’t get is why anyone still believes anything he says.
Yep, the 1930s were obviously hot (..and dusty of course). .. I guess the temp. stations were not affected by big city locations and UHI in those days!
By the way, I’m frustrated when I see claims like: “the hottest year in [US] history.” Surely they mean “history” since mankind started recording the temps in 1880. The overall global trend in the last 130 ~ 140 years has only been *less than 1 degree Celsius, .. and ~130 years is a relatively small time period in geological history. If you go further back in time, the proxy records tell us that the temps were often warmer than this decade. As shown in this graph: .. http://iceagenow.info/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Easterbrook-Natural_global_warming.jpg
So the recent warming looks to be well within the *natural warming and cooling cycles, and appears to be a recovery from the so-called ‘Little Ice Age’, from about 1550 to 1850 .. However, some people say that the *acceleration* of the recent warming is more than can be seen in the proxy records. Does that necessarily mean anything? What evidence is there that a relatively high rate of warming can have an large effect on the global climate? Certainly nothing particularly catastrophic has happened during the last 15+ years, when the overall average global temps have not been increasing.
If you want a high rate of warming how about the end of the Wisconsin Ice Age and the start of the Holocene interglacial?
In his book, The Two-Mile Time Machine: Ice Cores, Abrupt Climate Change, and Our Future Richard Alley, one of the world’s leading climate researchers, tells the fascinating history of global climate changes as revealed by reading the annual rings of ice from cores drilled in Greenland. In the 1990s he and his colleagues made headlines with the discovery that the last ice age came to an abrupt end over a period of only three years….
Or how about the 24 Dansgaard-Oeschger oscillations during the Wisconsin Ice Age?
Of course to POTUS it was the hottest year…his memory can’t recall any farther back.
Of course it was the hottest year ever, after his team adjust it that way. After all you cannot possible believe the non adjusted record could you after all it has error it. We fixed all the errors, now, what you question why the errors in the past means the temperatures need to go down and the present up. Well that the only way it can work I would explain it to you but your to stupid to understand how it need to work.
Climate Clown 1st Class would know more about Kenyan surface temperatures.
Percent of max temps over 100 degrees doesn’t really refute Obama’s statement at all. Take 5 sample data points of 100, 90, 80, 70, 60. 20% are 100 or higher. Now take another set of data points: 99, 98, 97, 96, 95. 0% are 100 or higher, but this second set of data points would be a hotter year than the first. Average temperature is a better way to refute Obama’s statement.
“If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. Period!” Alabama Supreme Court says “Birth certificate a forgery.” Odumbo lies and lies.