STUDY FINDS WARMING TREND THAT COULD RAISE SEA LEVELS – NYTimes.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Greg in NZ on Back To The Future
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- arn on “records going back to 1961”
Top men are looking into this … top men …
Typo – should read “Pot men are looking into this….pot men….”
These uncertainties are, to a large extent, recognized in the new report, signed by Dr. James Hansen and six colleagues at the space studies institute.
———————————————————————————–
‘Nuff said.
Why doesn’t the “inquisative” media ever check the witch doctor’s track record rather than just accepting it on blind faith? To think they used to call it the “4th Estate”. What a joke.
The fourth estate has moved onto the internet where actual investigators can investigate things. Media is nothing more than a mouthpiece for various rich guys who want to rule over us all.
I suspect that we’re dealing with two illegal substances and it should have read, “Crack Pot” Men.
Or “Crack Head”, perhaps?
From the NYT article:
“In their analysis, the scientists seek to respond to an outspoken skeptic regarding the carbon dioxide threat, Dr. Sherwood B. Idso, a climate specialist with the Federal Department of Agriculture in Phoenix. Last March he circulated an analysis saying that a doubling or tripling of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have little effect except to increase global agricultural productivity by 20 to 50 percent.”
And, here’s the latest on Dr. Idso:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherwood_B._Idso
Activists respond to critics. Scientists seek the truth.
Remember, all the global warming crisis meetings were held in lush, warm resorts right next to sunny beaches!
They aren’t stupid, they are mean.
And never do they mention the dire, hideous deaths and destruction of global cooling and the benefits of warm cycles.
You’re right, they don’t mention a thing about cooling, which to a rational person would, nay should represent the bigger threat to civilization and life as we know it.
I’ve made a précis of the last paragraph. ‘Anything can happen.’