STUDY FINDS WARMING TREND THAT COULD RAISE SEA LEVELS – NYTimes.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Communist West Germany
- Earth On Fire
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
Recent Comments
- William on Earth On Fire
- Francis Barnett on Earth On Fire
- arn on Communist West Germany
- Luigi on Communist West Germany
- Luigi on Communist West Germany
- Bob G on Communist West Germany
- Greg in NZ on Earth On Fire
- arn on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- William on Earth On Fire
Top men are looking into this … top men …
Typo – should read “Pot men are looking into this….pot men….”
These uncertainties are, to a large extent, recognized in the new report, signed by Dr. James Hansen and six colleagues at the space studies institute.
———————————————————————————–
‘Nuff said.
Why doesn’t the “inquisative” media ever check the witch doctor’s track record rather than just accepting it on blind faith? To think they used to call it the “4th Estate”. What a joke.
The fourth estate has moved onto the internet where actual investigators can investigate things. Media is nothing more than a mouthpiece for various rich guys who want to rule over us all.
I suspect that we’re dealing with two illegal substances and it should have read, “Crack Pot” Men.
Or “Crack Head”, perhaps?
From the NYT article:
“In their analysis, the scientists seek to respond to an outspoken skeptic regarding the carbon dioxide threat, Dr. Sherwood B. Idso, a climate specialist with the Federal Department of Agriculture in Phoenix. Last March he circulated an analysis saying that a doubling or tripling of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have little effect except to increase global agricultural productivity by 20 to 50 percent.”
And, here’s the latest on Dr. Idso:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherwood_B._Idso
Activists respond to critics. Scientists seek the truth.
Remember, all the global warming crisis meetings were held in lush, warm resorts right next to sunny beaches!
They aren’t stupid, they are mean.
And never do they mention the dire, hideous deaths and destruction of global cooling and the benefits of warm cycles.
You’re right, they don’t mention a thing about cooling, which to a rational person would, nay should represent the bigger threat to civilization and life as we know it.
I’ve made a précis of the last paragraph. ‘Anything can happen.’