STUDY FINDS WARMING TREND THAT COULD RAISE SEA LEVELS – NYTimes.com
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Hank Phillips on “getting smaller”
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
Top men are looking into this … top men …
Typo – should read “Pot men are looking into this….pot men….”
These uncertainties are, to a large extent, recognized in the new report, signed by Dr. James Hansen and six colleagues at the space studies institute.
———————————————————————————–
‘Nuff said.
Why doesn’t the “inquisative” media ever check the witch doctor’s track record rather than just accepting it on blind faith? To think they used to call it the “4th Estate”. What a joke.
The fourth estate has moved onto the internet where actual investigators can investigate things. Media is nothing more than a mouthpiece for various rich guys who want to rule over us all.
I suspect that we’re dealing with two illegal substances and it should have read, “Crack Pot” Men.
Or “Crack Head”, perhaps?
From the NYT article:
“In their analysis, the scientists seek to respond to an outspoken skeptic regarding the carbon dioxide threat, Dr. Sherwood B. Idso, a climate specialist with the Federal Department of Agriculture in Phoenix. Last March he circulated an analysis saying that a doubling or tripling of atmospheric carbon dioxide would have little effect except to increase global agricultural productivity by 20 to 50 percent.”
And, here’s the latest on Dr. Idso:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherwood_B._Idso
Activists respond to critics. Scientists seek the truth.
Remember, all the global warming crisis meetings were held in lush, warm resorts right next to sunny beaches!
They aren’t stupid, they are mean.
And never do they mention the dire, hideous deaths and destruction of global cooling and the benefits of warm cycles.
You’re right, they don’t mention a thing about cooling, which to a rational person would, nay should represent the bigger threat to civilization and life as we know it.
I’ve made a prĂ©cis of the last paragraph. ‘Anything can happen.’