All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
– Edmund Burke
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Ellen Flees To The UK
- HUD Climate Advisor
- Causes Of Increased Storminess
- Scientist Kamala Harris
- The End Of Polar Bears
- Cats And Hamsters Cause Hurricanes
- Democrats’ Campaign Of Joy
- New BBC Climate Expert
- 21st Century Toddlers Discuss Climate Change
- “the United States has suffered a “precipitous increase” in hurricane strikes”
- Thing Of The Past Returns
- “Impossible Heatwaves”
- Billion Dollar Electric Chargers
- “Not A Mandate”
- Up Is Down
- The Clean Energy Boom
- Climate Change In Spain
- The Clock Is Ticking
- “hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- “Peace, Relief, And Recovery”
- “Earth’s hottest weather in 120,000 years”
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Michael Mann Hurricane Update
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
Recent Comments
- Jehzsa on “Gender-responsive climate action”
- Peter Carroll on Causes Of Increased Storminess
- arn on HUD Climate Advisor
- spren on HUD Climate Advisor
- conrad ziefle on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Tel on Ellen Flees To The UK
- Petit_Barde on Ellen Flees To The UK
- dm on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Gamecock on Scientist Kamala Harris
- Richard E Fritz on The End Of Polar Bears
That quote is a good summary for the way in which good scientists were led to compromise their own values to be part of the consensus community that reviewed each other’s proposals and papers to decide the
1. Amount of grant funds received
2. Number of peer-reviewed papers
Dr. Marvin Herndon published a good analysis of this corrupt system a few years ago. I will try to find and post a link to his work below.
http://nuclearplanet.com/corruption.pdf
Forgiveness and healing from the trauma of Climategate emails may be aided by sharing:
a.) Aston’s warning on 12 Dec 1922 of the danger of transforming Earth into a star by uncontrollable release of nuclear energy [See page 20, last paragraph of Aston’s Nobel Prize Lecture]:
http://veksler.jinr.ru/becquerel/text/books/aston-lecture.pdf
b.) Information on uncontrolled chaos in the closing days of WWII
_ 1. Allied atomic bombs destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki;
_ 2. Japan exploded an atomic bomb off the east coast of Konan, Korea; http://tinyurl.com/my5zsty
_ 3. Stalin’s USSR troops captured Japan’s atomic bomb facility and took scientists and technicians to Russia; http://tinyurl.com/n3agdan and
_ 4. A young nuclear geochemist took secret possession of Japan’s atomic bomb plans . . . http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/2170881.stm
FEAR of death forged the alliance of world leaders and scientists that Climategate emails exposed in Nov 2009.
But “science” now just means the work of the group of people called “scientists”. This contrasts to what we skeptics means (skeptic science) which is all about using the “scientific” method, data, facts, conservative assertions. Yes SKEPTIC science is a standard – and yes skeptic science has been under attack by those in the group calling itself “science”.
But how can you corrupt a consensus group called science, or a consensus subgroup called “climate science” – by bringing in people who don’t agree with the consensus!!!
From their perspective the “corruption of climate science” would be the dilution of their group consensus.
Yes for a skeptic supporting SKEPTIC science, they are corrupting what we see as “science”. But skeptic science is not what “science” means these days. (Hence the need to create a term for what we do mean)
The “group calling itself science” is more accurately known as “academics” (or “academic scientists”), or, among themselves, “peer scientists”. They reserve to themselves the right to pass “final” or “settled” judgment on all scientific questions and arguments. I am myself now without peer (in areas not previously made scientific by other investigators, but impinging, nevertheless, on all their fields, and correcting of their very foundations; so mine is the discovery of an entirely new field of science–to modern science, that is, but not to those who designed the world). Other comments here express the need for a revolution; the great design I have discovered is the truth and proper goal of the revolution, the newly-uncovered root of all the earth and life sciences.
Doing away with the universities is not the answer. Confronting, and accepting, my work, and making the Great Design of the “gods” the new paradigm, is the answer. In climate science, it will have to be admitted, finally, that the temperature of the Earth is stable (although highly variable, to man, regionally, diurnally and seasonally, and with transient weather phenomena), and not at all subject to runaway warming OR cooling, because it was designed to be so. And very simply designed, globally–as I have continually pointed out, for 3 and 1/2 years–in accordance with the mass of our atmosphere, the hydrostatic, vertical temperature lapse rate of the troposphere, and the distance of the Earth from the Sun.
Maybe Steven and others on here should apply for Grants??
Put forth a plan to study the dire effects of Global Warming and Temperature rise… Then submit results with just the opposite… Hansen’s cooling of the past chart… Or NOAA data manipulation graphs would suffice… Keep it simple… A 2 page report…
No NO, you do not understand how it really works. Se Scott Armstrong’s paper “Bafflegab Pays”
Whilst I appreciate the sentiment, the “Burke” quote is bogus. See:
http://tartarus.org/martin/essays/burkequote.html and http://tartarus.org/martin/essays/burkequote2.html
Use it, or a variant, by all means; but don’t attribute it to Burke. The closest to this phrasing by Burke, according to Wikiquote, is “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Edmund_Burke#Disputed