Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
Recent Comments
- Dan A Sinema on Homophobic Gas
- Conrad Ziefle on Ivy Echo Chamber
- feathers on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Bert on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- czechlist on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- Dan A Sinema on Climate Homicide
Tories Thank Obama For His Support Of Labour
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Just so folks here know how the UK election is related to “Climate Change”…
December 2014:
Ed Miliband lambasts PM for ‘ignoring advice on climate change’
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/ed-miliband-lambasts-pm-for-ignoring-advice-on-climate-change-9908487.html
The Labour leader, who was climate change secretary of state in the last government, adds: “The leadership and political consensus we once offered the world have been replaced by dither and denial.”
May 2015:
Ed Miliband Resigns As Labour Party Leader
http://news.sky.com/story/1480212/ed-miliband-resigns-as-labour-party-leader
The Labour leader quits after a shock election drubbing, and tells supporters he is “truly sorry” he did not succeed.
Dare we hope that the Republicans will learn from this, and mount a real opposition to the leftist climate propaganda campaign?
Don’t hope. You’ll just be disappointed.
The strongest voice against the warmist mongering in England is the UK Independence Party. They took 12% of this vote which a respectable %, but they held only one seat. They are in a difficult position because that England geographically is even more RED vs BLUE than the U.S. In places where Labour is strong, the UK Independence Party is the second party of choice. In places where the Tories are strong, the UK Independence Party is the second party of choice. So they often come in second and win no seats.
However UKIP is still having an influence because the Labour and Tory parties know UKIP is nipping at their heels so they do not dare to anything too outrageous.
Given Rotherham I do have to agree: Labour’s PCC Victory In the Rape-Gang Regions of the North Is Proof that Turkeys Do Vote for Christmas
We can see that here in the USA too. To Progs, placating a minority voting block is much much more important than the Rule of Law.
Fabian cofounder George Bernard Shaw summed up the Fabian Socialist/Progressive attitude towards the Rule of Law.
“A government with the policy to rob Peter to pay Paul can be assured of the support of Paul.”
Only the actions that benefit those in power will be followed even if it is ruinous to the citizens and even the country.
I’m thinking UKIP just hit their top. They’re at about the same level of support as Greece’s Golden Dawn had, before Greece decided that democracy wasn’t so great after all:
http://news.yahoo.com/trial-greeces-nazi-inspired-golden-dawn-party-reopens-084113359.html;_ylt=AwrSbgSMY01VWxcAtVBXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTEzb3NtaGwzBGNvbG8DZ3ExBHBvcwMxBHZ0aWQDVklQNTc3XzEEc2VjA3Nj
I honestly don’t know enough about Golden Dawn to comment on the merits of the charges. But in the eyes of the ruling class, UKIP and Golden Dawn are interchangeable. Expect UKIP to be banned shortly, just like Flemish nationalist parties always seem to get banned once they pass 10%.
There isn’t the slightest chance that UKIP will be be banned.
What would be the justification, that they are popular?
The greens got nowhere in this election, retaining their single seat (out of 650), and the greenish lib dems got absolutely hammered, but it would be a terrible mistake to think that climate change was an issue in this election.
The issue barely got a mention and it registered bottom of peoples concerns. It was never debated and all the main parties seemed to agree to leave it off the agenda.
We may have gotten the right result but it was more to do with a total plonker being in charge of labour. Unfortunately, you in the US only have a massive plonker, O’bummer, and not a total one in charge of the Democrats
I’m surprised that Climate Change didn’t get more traction on the left in the UK. After all, Miliband was the Climate Change Czar for several years – you would think he would have made that issue one of the cornerstones of his campaign.
I completely agree that climate change wasn’t an issue at all in this election. I didn’t even hear about Labour’s crazy “de-carbonise by 2030” manifesto pledge until two days before the election. The Conservative swing was in my view due to people being appalled at the prospect of a Labour-SNP coalition.
I am glad for the political swing. But am not Enlish. However, ‘the best statistician’ who predicts these thing, Nate Silverman, didn’t see this coming. The great lesson to be learned is we can’t nor will we ever be able to predict the future well, ESPECIALLY with climate models.
I really wonder if the polls weren’t intentionally biased, like some state races were in 2014. I recall a couple that were many points off where they ended. One or two that were going to be landslides turned out almost even, and some dead heats were runaways.
So sorry, have no idea why I wrote Silverman, when it is Nate Silver!
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-27062278
What I’m still trying to figure out is the absolute massacre north of Hadrian’s wall. SNP picked up 50 seats, to 56. Scotland only has 59 seats. Aren’t the Scottish Nationalists the ones pushing for, you know, Scottish nationalism? Weren’t they supposedly beaten by 11%, just seven months ago?
It’s been overshadowed by the apparently fraudulent exit polling in England. But I can’t be the only one thinking there’s something rotten in Scotland. I’m starting to wonder if, just maybe, that independence referendum might have had an irregularity or two. I know. That’s crazy talk.
VOTER FRAUD:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/rigvote.html
As Stalin said it is who COUNTS the votes who matters.
I wasn’t under the impression they even bothered to count the votes. What’s the point, when only one outcome can be allowed?