The Satellite Deniers

2016-01-17-16-52-39 2016-01-17-16-51-37

The climate mafia has enlisted these two handsome gentlemen to discredit satellite temperatures. Neither of them knows anything about the topic, but their specialties are talking climate trash for cash – so they were perfect for the job.

Satellites are a problem for the climate mafia, because they show just how bad recent surface temperature fraud is.

2016-01-17-16-58-55

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The claim from the climate clowns is that satellite temperatures have to be adjusted for error, unlike surface temperatures which they say “hardly need to be adjusted.

Wow! All this data tampering for nothing?

GISS1982_2002_2014_2015_2

They do have just one minor problem however. The 1995 IPCC report, authored by none other than NOAA’s own Tom Karl, showed that satellite temperatures matched NOAA balloon data, and that neither showed any warming since 1979.

2016-01-17-16-57-272016-01-17-16-57-38

2016-01-17-16-56-292016-01-17-16-56-42

ipcc_sar_wg_I_full_report.pdf

There is no legitimate basis for disputing the satellite temperatures. This is just one more layer of fraud piled on by the usual clowns.

CZAPy-uWMAAk1LS

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Satellite Deniers

  1. Dale Hartz says:

    So, all the satellites we now accept as reliable may not be useful at all if they use similar technology. Thus, we can’t depend on the sea level rise, the ice extent, ice mass, and the 1305 registered satellites circling the globe. NASA designed satellites that took us to the moon and back, that landed on Mars twice, explored other planets and outer space, and much, much more.

    So they believe that only the temperature satellites built by NASA and operated by Remote Sensing Services(RSS) and the University of Alabama-Huntsville(UAH). Also supported by information from 70,000 Resonde Balloons launched by NOAA every year.

    It is a shame the government takes this stance against only one technology while using all the others.

  2. FTOP says:

    What cereal boxes include a climate scientist PhD? Must be where these guys got theirs.

  3. John Thwaite says:

    If you can’t argue with the message and retain any credibility, go for the messengers which in this case, are the satellites.

  4. Ben Vorlich says:

    I have read several times recently that balloon temperature records closely match those of the satellites. Do you have anything that confirms this?

  5. oeman50 says:

    Are those guys brothers? They look very similar. Do all “climate scientists” look like that?

  6. Doonhamer says:

    It is the lack of cranial insulation that makes them very sensitive of global warming.

  7. DirkH says:

    It’s so they can recognize who’s in the Team.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.