John Kerry Grants Manhattan A Century Long Reprieve!

Screenshot 2016-04-06 at 12.18.37 AM

Climate expert John Kerry says that Manhattan will be underwater by the turn of the century. This is awesome news, because NASA’s James Hansen had said Manhattan would be underwater by 2008.

CeO-VwzVIAImm5Z

Stormy weather – Salon.com

Sea level at Manhattan has been rising at the same rate of about one inch per decade since the Civil War.

download

Sea Level Trends – State Selection

Lower Manhattan street elevations range from about 10 feet to 50 feet above sea level, which means it will be more like 1,000 years before they are encroached. But when you are an idiot in charge of nuclear negotiations for the Messiah Obama, no math skills are required or desired.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to John Kerry Grants Manhattan A Century Long Reprieve!

  1. kamas716 says:

    only another 84 years to go

    • omanuel says:

      John Kerry is a puppet of the real power brokers.”

      We have incorrectly blamed the obvious “power brokers” (Presidents, The UN Secretary General, Senators, Popes, etc.) for difficulties engineered by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) – the “Scientific-Technological-Elite” former President Eisenhower warned might take control of government policy in his departing message to the nation on 17 JAN 1961:

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GOLld5PR4ts

      World leaders (Presidents, The UN Secretary General, Senators, Popes, etc.) seem to be captives of the “Scientific-Technological-Elite” that fabricates “consensus” science through NAS control of budgets of federal research agencies.

      Our challenge now is to by-pass this blockade and inform real power brokers (Presidents, The UN Secretary General, Senators, Popes, etc.) what is essential to the survival of humanity, living on a water-covered planet exactly 1 AU away from the pulsar core of the supernova that . . .

      1. Made all of our chemical elements
      2. Birthed the solar system five billion years (5 Ga) ago
      3. Sustained the origin and evolution of live here after 3.8 Ga ago
      4. Still controls every atom, life and planet in the solar system today:

      https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf

      • omanuel says:

        Eisenhower’s 1961 warning was confirmed thirty-seven years later by a 1998 CSPAN News video showing NASA hid data from the 1995 Galileo probe of Jupiter

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m3VIFmZpFco

        Data that confirmed 1972-1975 findings the Sun made our chemical elements and birthed the entire solar system

        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AQZe_Qk-q7M

        World leaders (Presidents, The UN Secretary General, Popes, Senators, Members of Parliament, etc.) are captives of a “Scientific-Technological-Elite”using “consensus scientific models” fabricated by NAS control of budgets of research agencies.

        Our challenge is to by-pass the blockade and get information to the real power brokers (Presidents, The UN Secretary General, Members of Parliament, Senators, Popes, etc.) so public policies benefit humanity, instead of the NAS:

        https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf

  2. gator69 says:

    It is odd that Lurch cannot do math when it comes to simple things like sea level rise, yet is some kind of math genius when it comes to his personal finances…

    After losing the election to Bush, his wife bought him a new $7.5 million yacht, an expensive bauble to assuage his stinging rebuke by the bitter clingers and assorted parvenus who couldn’t distinguish a Chablis from a Chardonnay.

    But then it turned out that he had registered the boat in Rhode Island rather than Massachusetts, to avoid his home state’s then 5 percent sales tax, not to mention the Town of Nantucket’s $70,000 annual boat excise tax.

    Confronted by reporters as he got into his car, he again began shouting.

    “Can I get out of here?” he yelled.

    Last year Kerry was accused of saying that Israel was in danger of becoming an apartheid state. He sort of denied it, but he did concede that “if I could rewind the tape…” blah-blah-blah.

    Then there was the time he blamed terrorism on the lack of fine dining options in the Maghreb – “the contrast between one family’s empty dinner plate and fancy restaurant’s lavish menu.”

    Kerry has been poor; he comes from the poor side of the Forbes family. Both of his wives have been Pennsylvania heiresses with net worths in the nine-figure range. When Julia Thorne Kerry finally threw him out of the house, he often slept on the living-room couch of his ex brother-in-law. There were even unconfirmed reports that some nights he actually slept in the backseat of his Chrysler LeBaron convertible, a accoutrement de rigeur among fashionable Democrat senators in the 1980s.

    Yet Kerry never turned to terrorism. Instead, he sought new prey, as any good gigolo would. Soon he was married to the widow of the late Sen. John Heinz of Pennsylvania. He was living in five different mansions. He had access to a private jet, the Flying Squirrel. During the 2004 campaign, it was noted that despite his thundering denunciations of American carbon emissions, he owned SUV’s at all five of his mansions.

    “They’re not my SUV’s,” he sniffed. “They’re my family’s SUV’s.”

    Lately, like ISIS, Liveshot has grown exasperated with anyone who has the audacity to call him out… on anything. The Charlie Hebdo faux pas (to use his favorite language) wasn’t the first time he’s come down on the wrong side of the First Amendment.

    This is Liveshot recently on global warming: “When science tells us that our climate is changing and human being are largely causing that change, by what right do people stand up and just say well I dispute that or I deny that elementary truth.”

    By what right? How about the Bill of Rights? How about the fact that you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about?

    Recently one of Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu’s new appointees was criticized for saying that Kerry has the “mental age” of a 12-year-old. Which didn’t seem quite fair to 12-year-olds.

    Throughout his political career, back home in Massachusetts, Kerry has been compared to an empty suit. Which, again, seems terribly unfair. What did empty suits ever do to deserve being compared to Secretary of State John Forbes Kerry?

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/19/john-kerry-45-years-gaffes-counting/

    • RAH says:

      Gator you just don’t understand those Frenchie kinda guys. But then again, neither do I.

      • gator69 says:

        I was born in France, and had dual citizenship until I was eighteen. Kerry is French, he is gauche.

        • gator69 says:

          Sorry, Kerry isn’t French, he is gauche.

        • RAH says:

          Sigh
          Guess you missed the hubbub a while back about Kerry being a Frenchie kinda guy in the news. It stemmed from the fact that he vacations there some and he has relatives in France.

        • gator69 says:

          No need to sigh, I didn’t miss any hubbub. In fact, I remember the original hubbub…

          John Kerry, in sworn testimony before the Senate in April 1971, said he met with the North Vietnamese and Vietcong delegations in Paris in May 1970. He said they discussed their peace proposals —— especially the eight points of Madam Binh. Kerry strongly recommended that the Senate accept those proposals.

          I have been to Paris. I have talked with both delegations at the peace talks, that is to say the Democratic Republic of Vietnam and the Provisional Revolutionary Government and of all eight of Madam Binh’s points…

          …I realize that even my visits in Paris, precedents had been set by Senator McCarthy and others, in a sense are on the borderline of private individuals negotiating, et cetera.

          In the ensuing months, Kerry became even more strident in his insistence that the US accept Madam Binh’s (and the NVM and VC’s) peace proposals.

          Meanwhile, other representatives of Kerry’s group, the Vietnam Veterans Against The War (VVAW ), met with the NVM and VC delegations in Paris, in March 1971. They were even photographed sitting at a table with them, as in a photo displayed in Winter Soldiers, by Richard Stacewicz, page 284.

          Subsequently, VVAW representatives met with the North Vietnamese and Vietcong delegations on numerous occasions, both in Paris and even in Hanoi.

          The VVAW even signed a treaty with the North Vietnamese which included all of Madam Binh’s points, as noted by the historian of the anti—war movement, Gerald Nicosia, his book Home To War:

          These people signed their own symbolic “people’s peace treaty” with the Vietnamese. As Jan Barry recalls, the gesture was intended as a means of embracing the people they had harmed, of asking forgiveness for those they had killed.

          You can read the “Peoples Peace Treaty” here:

          According to Nicosia, FBI files show Kerry made another trip in 1971 to meet with the NVM and VC delegations:

          The [FBI] files record that Kerry made another trip to Paris that summer to learn how the North Vietnamese might release prisoners.

          It is quite likely that Kerry’s actions were in violation of the so—called Logan Act: United States Code Title 18, Part I, Chapter 45, Sec. 953

          Any citizen of the United States, wherever he may be, who, without authority of the United States, directly or indirectly commences or carries on any correspondence or intercourse with any foreign government or any officer or agent thereof, with intent to influence the measures or conduct of any foreign government or of any officer or agent thereof, in relation to any disputes or controversies with the United States, or to defeat the measures of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

          Kerry’s own comments in his Senate testimony show he might have been aware of this. But no one has ever been prosecuted under the Logan Act.

          That might not be true of article 104 of the UMCJ, however.

          Perhaps it is the fear of this legal liability that caused the Kerry camp to fudge the chronology of Kerry’s service record to provide a two year gap, from (coincidentally) April 1970 to 1972.

          http://www.americanthinker.com/2004/08/did_navy_lt_kerry_violate_the.html#ixzz453H6U12Q

          This was after he tried to avoid the draft by requesting a deferment so he could “study” in Paris.

          My mother used to love vacationing in France. Before the Paris attacks and the most recent muslim invasion, most people thought France was a great vacation spot (just wouldn’t want to live there). What makes Lurch repulsive is not his choice of vacation destinations, it is the fact that he is gauche.

          English…

          Gauche: 1a : lacking social experience or grace; also : not tactful : crude
          b : crudely made or done

          http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gauche

          French…

          Gauche: adjective, [main] left, [côté] left, left-hand

          http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/french-english/gauche

        • Now I am confused. A Gauche-American? I always thought Kerry was a Douche-American.

          Or is he a double-hyphenated Gauche-Douche-American?

  3. Edmonotn Al says:

    Yet… American voters keep electing frauds that then appoint air-heads like Kerry.
    Now it is happening here in Canada.
    Mark Steyn’s book, After America, covers people Kerry.
    He is right up there with a whole string of brainless politicians.
    Maybe Trump, if he gets in, will shake things up?

  4. Steve Case says:

    NASA has a new sea level web site:

    https://sealevel.nasa.gov/

  5. Andy DC says:

    Maybe Hillary will also face a contested convention. Especially if somehow Uncle Bernie manages to win the NY primary. If so, there could be groundswell for Kerry or Gore. Yuck! One of those two slobbering buffoons may yet be President!

  6. jack Schramm says:

    Yesterday I posted a comment with a link regarding Attorney Generals in various states preparing to prosecute “climate change deniers” possibly even including yourself, unless of course you are some kind of controlled opposition. Further, I referenced the blatant failure of these same AGs to prosecute any bankers for all of the substantial crime right before our eyes regarding the 2008 mortgage loan security scandal . These are only two examples of the many, many big lies being propagated by the powers that be through their control of the 6 companies that own mass media as well as other avenues of communication monopoly/oligarchy controlled. The post did not appear nor did I receive an explanation.
    As a result, let me offer a brief critique of your “can’t see the forest for the trees” website:
    Pencil dick sniping at big lies does not work very well. CO2 induced global warming, at the levels put forward for this trace gas, that is necessary for the survival of all plant life, is not plauseble. In order to overcome this inconvenient truth a compelling mechanism of action is needed in the theory of anthropomorphic warming. There is no compelling explanation of how this tiny gas increases by an even tinier amount and the Earth’s atmosphere is heated significantly. Not to mention all the counter forces that are also in play. Fake graph temperature correleations to “prove” co2 causes warming of course prove nothing. Correlation is not causation as any intro to statistics student can attest. Of course, in this case there is not even real correlation. I am a renasance man with 5 patents for which I am inventor, have been the president of 4 pharmaceutical companies and many other credentials which are irrelevant to the argument, as are credentials to any science. The FDA will not approve any drug with out a plaueseble mechanism of action explanation no matter the clinical trial statistics, which are compiled by the world’s highest paid statisticians. The statistical methods being used to compute the global warming theory are done with crayons by and for idiots.

  7. 1 inch/decade +/- a foot = 25.40000 mm / 10 years = 2.540000 mm / year

  8. Edmonotn Al says:

    How much is subsidence??

  9. jay352 says:

    Ah !! The accidental diplomat throws his hat into the climate prediction ring. Why should we doubt him after his stunning work getting Russia to broker a Syrian peace deal?

  10. omanuel says:

    As long as the National Academy of Sciences controls budget review of federal research agencies, they will continue to control government policies through “consensus scientific conclusions” held together by 100% consensus on the need of federal research funds for scientists.

    Humanity and “elected” world leaders are all held captive by NAS control of budgets of research agencies and geo-engineering plans for planet Earth to become like the planet described in UN’s Agenda 21.

  11. nancyg22 says:

    Is it evil of me to wish NYC was under water and all the liberals there drowned?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *